纠正过去:未能复制Psi

CSN: General Emergence of Cognition (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-06-19 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2001721

Jeff Galak, Robyn A. Leboeuf, Leif D. Nelson, J. Simmons

{"title":"纠正过去:未能复制Psi","authors":"Jeff Galak, Robyn A. Leboeuf, Leif D. Nelson, J. Simmons","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2001721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across seven experiments (N = 3,289) we replicate the procedure of Experiments 8 and 9 from Bem (2011), which had originally demonstrated retroactive facilitation of recall. We failed to replicate that finding. We further conduct a meta-analysis of all replication attempts of these experiments and find that the average effect size (d = .04) is no different from zero. We discuss some reasons for differences between the results in this paper and those presented in Bem (2011).","PeriodicalId":370916,"journal":{"name":"CSN: General Emergence of Cognition (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correcting the Past: Failures to Replicate Psi\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Galak, Robyn A. Leboeuf, Leif D. Nelson, J. Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2001721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Across seven experiments (N = 3,289) we replicate the procedure of Experiments 8 and 9 from Bem (2011), which had originally demonstrated retroactive facilitation of recall. We failed to replicate that finding. We further conduct a meta-analysis of all replication attempts of these experiments and find that the average effect size (d = .04) is no different from zero. We discuss some reasons for differences between the results in this paper and those presented in Bem (2011).\",\"PeriodicalId\":370916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CSN: General Emergence of Cognition (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CSN: General Emergence of Cognition (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2001721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSN: General Emergence of Cognition (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2001721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 41

摘要

在七个实验(N = 3,289)中，我们重复了Bem(2011)的实验8和9的过程，这些实验最初证明了追溯促进记忆。我们没能重复这个发现。我们进一步对这些实验的所有重复尝试进行了荟萃分析，发现平均效应大小(d = .04)与零没有不同。我们讨论了本文结果与Bem(2011)中提出的结果之间差异的一些原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Correcting the Past: Failures to Replicate Psi

Across seven experiments (N = 3,289) we replicate the procedure of Experiments 8 and 9 from Bem (2011), which had originally demonstrated retroactive facilitation of recall. We failed to replicate that finding. We further conduct a meta-analysis of all replication attempts of these experiments and find that the average effect size (d = .04) is no different from zero. We discuss some reasons for differences between the results in this paper and those presented in Bem (2011).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CSN: General Emergence of Cognition (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量