向前迈进:迈向更系统化的自动化NPF

Laura P. Wolton, Deserai A. Crow, Tanya Heikkila
{"title":"向前迈进:迈向更系统化的自动化NPF","authors":"Laura P. Wolton, Deserai A. Crow, Tanya Heikkila","doi":"10.15788/npf3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advancements in automated text analysis have substantially increased our capacity to study large volumes of documents systematically in policy process research. The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF)—which promotes empirical analysis of narratives—has the potential to usher policy narrative research along the same path. Using the NPF and existing semi-automated analysis tools, we investigate the relationship between narrative components—namely, characters and proposed solutions—and the more “skeletal” frames that tie policy narrative elements to one another. To illustrate how these tools can advance policy narrative research, we auto-code 5,708 state and local news articles focusing on hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas. The findings suggest that the use and role of characters and policy solutions are portrayed in significantly different ways depending on the frame used. By using an autocoding approach, these findings increase our methodological and theoretical understanding of the relationship between narrative elements and frames in policy narratives. In discussing these findings, we also consider their implications for how issue frames matter theoretically in the NPF.","PeriodicalId":168326,"journal":{"name":"Narratives and the Policy Process : Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stepping Forward: Towards a More Systematic NPF with Automation\",\"authors\":\"Laura P. Wolton, Deserai A. Crow, Tanya Heikkila\",\"doi\":\"10.15788/npf3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advancements in automated text analysis have substantially increased our capacity to study large volumes of documents systematically in policy process research. The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF)—which promotes empirical analysis of narratives—has the potential to usher policy narrative research along the same path. Using the NPF and existing semi-automated analysis tools, we investigate the relationship between narrative components—namely, characters and proposed solutions—and the more “skeletal” frames that tie policy narrative elements to one another. To illustrate how these tools can advance policy narrative research, we auto-code 5,708 state and local news articles focusing on hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas. The findings suggest that the use and role of characters and policy solutions are portrayed in significantly different ways depending on the frame used. By using an autocoding approach, these findings increase our methodological and theoretical understanding of the relationship between narrative elements and frames in policy narratives. In discussing these findings, we also consider their implications for how issue frames matter theoretically in the NPF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narratives and the Policy Process : Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narratives and the Policy Process : Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15788/npf3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narratives and the Policy Process : Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15788/npf3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动文本分析的进步大大提高了我们在政策过程研究中系统地研究大量文件的能力。叙事政策框架(NPF)促进了对叙事的实证分析,有可能引领政策叙事研究走上同样的道路。使用NPF和现有的半自动化分析工具,我们研究了叙事组件(即人物和建议的解决方案)与将政策叙事元素彼此联系起来的更“骨架”框架之间的关系。为了说明这些工具是如何推动政策叙事研究的,我们自动编码了5708篇关于油气水力压裂的州和地方新闻文章。研究结果表明,根据所使用的框架,人物和政策解决方案的使用和作用以显著不同的方式被描绘出来。通过使用自动编码方法,这些发现增加了我们对政策叙事中叙事元素和框架之间关系的方法论和理论理解。在讨论这些发现时,我们还考虑了它们对问题框架在NPF中的理论重要性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stepping Forward: Towards a More Systematic NPF with Automation
Advancements in automated text analysis have substantially increased our capacity to study large volumes of documents systematically in policy process research. The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF)—which promotes empirical analysis of narratives—has the potential to usher policy narrative research along the same path. Using the NPF and existing semi-automated analysis tools, we investigate the relationship between narrative components—namely, characters and proposed solutions—and the more “skeletal” frames that tie policy narrative elements to one another. To illustrate how these tools can advance policy narrative research, we auto-code 5,708 state and local news articles focusing on hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas. The findings suggest that the use and role of characters and policy solutions are portrayed in significantly different ways depending on the frame used. By using an autocoding approach, these findings increase our methodological and theoretical understanding of the relationship between narrative elements and frames in policy narratives. In discussing these findings, we also consider their implications for how issue frames matter theoretically in the NPF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信