镦锻4118钢轴的超声检测

{"title":"镦锻4118钢轴的超声检测","authors":"","doi":"10.31399/asm.fach.usage.c0059932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Field failures, traced to internal cracks that were initiated from gross nonmetallics, were encountered in the upset portion of forged 4118 steel shafts. Ultrasonic inspection was thought to be the best method for detection from the location of these cracks, their orientation, and the size of the shaft. A longitudinal beam was sent in from the end of the shaft. The shaft was observed to have a radially drilled oil hole 9 mm in diam. Since there was a variation in flaw orientation, testing of the shaft was desired from both the long and short end. The rejection level was set at 20% of full screen and was based on the size of flaws observed when the shafts were cut up. The inclusions were considered to be rejectable if the size was larger than 20 mm diam. Similar flaws were observed in larger shafts, but no flaws were observed once the shafts were sectioned. It was interpreted that the flaw signals were false and had happened when a portion of the beam struck the oily surface of the longitudinal oil hole. The problem was solved by removing the oil film from the longitudinal oil hole.","PeriodicalId":194756,"journal":{"name":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Improper Maintenance, Repair, and Operating Conditions","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonic Inspection of an Upset-Forged 4118 Steel Shaft\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.31399/asm.fach.usage.c0059932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Field failures, traced to internal cracks that were initiated from gross nonmetallics, were encountered in the upset portion of forged 4118 steel shafts. Ultrasonic inspection was thought to be the best method for detection from the location of these cracks, their orientation, and the size of the shaft. A longitudinal beam was sent in from the end of the shaft. The shaft was observed to have a radially drilled oil hole 9 mm in diam. Since there was a variation in flaw orientation, testing of the shaft was desired from both the long and short end. The rejection level was set at 20% of full screen and was based on the size of flaws observed when the shafts were cut up. The inclusions were considered to be rejectable if the size was larger than 20 mm diam. Similar flaws were observed in larger shafts, but no flaws were observed once the shafts were sectioned. It was interpreted that the flaw signals were false and had happened when a portion of the beam struck the oily surface of the longitudinal oil hole. The problem was solved by removing the oil film from the longitudinal oil hole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Improper Maintenance, Repair, and Operating Conditions\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Improper Maintenance, Repair, and Operating Conditions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.usage.c0059932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Improper Maintenance, Repair, and Operating Conditions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.usage.c0059932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在4118锻造钢轴的镦粗部分遇到了现场故障,可追溯到由总非金属引起的内部裂纹。超声检查被认为是最好的方法来检测这些裂缝的位置,他们的方向,以及轴的大小。一根纵梁从轴的末端送了进来。观察到轴上有一个直径为9毫米的径向钻油孔。由于存在缺陷方向的变化,因此需要从长端和短端对轴进行测试。截留水平设定为全屏的20%,并基于在竖井切割时观察到的缺陷大小。如果直径大于20毫米,则认为夹杂物是不合格的。在较大的竖井中也观察到类似的缺陷,但一旦竖井被切开,就没有发现缺陷。据解释,缺陷信号是假的,是由于梁的一部分击中了纵向油孔的油面而发生的。通过去除纵向油孔的油膜,解决了这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasonic Inspection of an Upset-Forged 4118 Steel Shaft
Field failures, traced to internal cracks that were initiated from gross nonmetallics, were encountered in the upset portion of forged 4118 steel shafts. Ultrasonic inspection was thought to be the best method for detection from the location of these cracks, their orientation, and the size of the shaft. A longitudinal beam was sent in from the end of the shaft. The shaft was observed to have a radially drilled oil hole 9 mm in diam. Since there was a variation in flaw orientation, testing of the shaft was desired from both the long and short end. The rejection level was set at 20% of full screen and was based on the size of flaws observed when the shafts were cut up. The inclusions were considered to be rejectable if the size was larger than 20 mm diam. Similar flaws were observed in larger shafts, but no flaws were observed once the shafts were sectioned. It was interpreted that the flaw signals were false and had happened when a portion of the beam struck the oily surface of the longitudinal oil hole. The problem was solved by removing the oil film from the longitudinal oil hole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信