{"title":"权力带来责任:Mazzoleni诉Summerhill案","authors":"Jonathan Rimmer","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The exercise of a power held in a fiduciary capacity can be open to challenge in court. In Mazzoleni v Summerhill Trust Company (Isle of Man) Limited (2021) 2DS 2021/3 the Isle of Man High Court tackled the decision by a conflicted trustee not to appoint a protector who might have overseen its decisions. Was a trustee bound to appoint a protector in any case? And could a trustee be compelled to exercise a power to appoint a protector—even if the terms of the power were not mandatory?","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"With Power Comes Responsibility: Mazzoleni v Summerhill\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Rimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The exercise of a power held in a fiduciary capacity can be open to challenge in court. In Mazzoleni v Summerhill Trust Company (Isle of Man) Limited (2021) 2DS 2021/3 the Isle of Man High Court tackled the decision by a conflicted trustee not to appoint a protector who might have overseen its decisions. Was a trustee bound to appoint a protector in any case? And could a trustee be compelled to exercise a power to appoint a protector—even if the terms of the power were not mandatory?\",\"PeriodicalId\":171463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
With Power Comes Responsibility: Mazzoleni v Summerhill
The exercise of a power held in a fiduciary capacity can be open to challenge in court. In Mazzoleni v Summerhill Trust Company (Isle of Man) Limited (2021) 2DS 2021/3 the Isle of Man High Court tackled the decision by a conflicted trustee not to appoint a protector who might have overseen its decisions. Was a trustee bound to appoint a protector in any case? And could a trustee be compelled to exercise a power to appoint a protector—even if the terms of the power were not mandatory?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
