瑞士NFI中ADS40图像分割结果的定量比较

Zuyuan Wang, R. Boesch, C. Ginzler
{"title":"瑞士NFI中ADS40图像分割结果的定量比较","authors":"Zuyuan Wang, R. Boesch, C. Ginzler","doi":"10.1109/ICIG.2011.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image segmentation is an important component in object based forest management with increasing high resolution remote sensing data such as ADS40 images. However, evaluation of segmentation algorithms has been largely subjective. To be able to evaluate image segmentation methods quantitatively and objectively, we applied a new error measurement which quantifies the performance of an image segmentation algorithm based on object shape and size as well. Experimental results show that the applied measurement is sensitive to over-segmentation and under-segmentation that can be served as a useful tool for further establishing an evaluation system.","PeriodicalId":277974,"journal":{"name":"2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Comparison of Segmentation Results from ADS40 Images in Swiss NFI\",\"authors\":\"Zuyuan Wang, R. Boesch, C. Ginzler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIG.2011.105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Image segmentation is an important component in object based forest management with increasing high resolution remote sensing data such as ADS40 images. However, evaluation of segmentation algorithms has been largely subjective. To be able to evaluate image segmentation methods quantitatively and objectively, we applied a new error measurement which quantifies the performance of an image segmentation algorithm based on object shape and size as well. Experimental results show that the applied measurement is sensitive to over-segmentation and under-segmentation that can be served as a useful tool for further establishing an evaluation system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIG.2011.105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIG.2011.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着ADS40影像等高分辨率遥感数据的不断增加,图像分割已成为基于地物的森林经营的重要组成部分。然而,对分割算法的评价在很大程度上是主观的。为了能够定量客观地评价图像分割方法,我们采用了一种新的误差测量方法,该方法可以量化基于物体形状和大小的图像分割算法的性能。实验结果表明,所采用的测量方法对过分割和欠分割都很敏感,可以为进一步建立评价体系提供有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Comparison of Segmentation Results from ADS40 Images in Swiss NFI
Image segmentation is an important component in object based forest management with increasing high resolution remote sensing data such as ADS40 images. However, evaluation of segmentation algorithms has been largely subjective. To be able to evaluate image segmentation methods quantitatively and objectively, we applied a new error measurement which quantifies the performance of an image segmentation algorithm based on object shape and size as well. Experimental results show that the applied measurement is sensitive to over-segmentation and under-segmentation that can be served as a useful tool for further establishing an evaluation system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信