安全研究中用户评价的系统分析

Peter Hamm, David Harborth, Sebastian Pape
{"title":"安全研究中用户评价的系统分析","authors":"Peter Hamm, David Harborth, Sebastian Pape","doi":"10.1145/3339252.3340339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a literature survey on reproducibility and replicability of user surveys in security research. For that purpose, we examined all papers published over the last five years at three leading security research conferences and recorded the type of study and whether the authors made the underlying responses available as open data, as well as if they published the used questionnaire respectively interview guide. We uncovered how user surveys become more widespread in security research and how authors and conferences are increasingly publishing their methodologies, while we had no examples of data being made available. Based on these findings, we recommend that future researchers publish their data in addition to their results to facilitate replication and ensure a firm basis for user studies in security research.","PeriodicalId":116983,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Analysis of User Evaluations in Security Research\",\"authors\":\"Peter Hamm, David Harborth, Sebastian Pape\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3339252.3340339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conducted a literature survey on reproducibility and replicability of user surveys in security research. For that purpose, we examined all papers published over the last five years at three leading security research conferences and recorded the type of study and whether the authors made the underlying responses available as open data, as well as if they published the used questionnaire respectively interview guide. We uncovered how user surveys become more widespread in security research and how authors and conferences are increasingly publishing their methodologies, while we had no examples of data being made available. Based on these findings, we recommend that future researchers publish their data in addition to their results to facilitate replication and ensure a firm basis for user studies in security research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3339252.3340339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3339252.3340339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们对安全研究中用户调查的再现性和可复制性进行了文献调查。为此,我们检查了过去五年中在三个主要安全研究会议上发表的所有论文,并记录了研究的类型,作者是否将潜在的回答作为开放数据提供,以及他们是否分别发布了使用问卷的访谈指南。我们发现用户调查如何在安全研究中变得越来越普遍,作者和会议如何越来越多地发布他们的方法,而我们没有数据可用的例子。基于这些发现,我们建议未来的研究人员除了发表结果外,还发表他们的数据,以促进复制,并确保安全研究中的用户研究有坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Analysis of User Evaluations in Security Research
We conducted a literature survey on reproducibility and replicability of user surveys in security research. For that purpose, we examined all papers published over the last five years at three leading security research conferences and recorded the type of study and whether the authors made the underlying responses available as open data, as well as if they published the used questionnaire respectively interview guide. We uncovered how user surveys become more widespread in security research and how authors and conferences are increasingly publishing their methodologies, while we had no examples of data being made available. Based on these findings, we recommend that future researchers publish their data in addition to their results to facilitate replication and ensure a firm basis for user studies in security research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信