一种新的用于多准则决策分析的归一化方法

R. Jiang
{"title":"一种新的用于多准则决策分析的归一化方法","authors":"R. Jiang","doi":"10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A typical multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problem aims to rank a set of alternatives according to a set of criteria. The problem deals with selection of criteria, determination of criteria weights, normalization of criteria scores and aggregation of normalized criteria scores. The focus of this paper is on the normalization method. Most MCDA methods (e.g., AHP and TOPSIS) use a linear normalization method. Its main drawback is that the “magnitudes” of the normalized criteria scores of different criteria are different in terms of average. The difference in magnitude actually changes the relative importances of criteria so that the final rankings of alternatives may not appropriately reflect the preference of decision makers. To address this issue, a novel normalization method is proposed. The proposed normalization method uses a Gaussian value function to transform the criteria scores to interval (0, 1). The parameters of the value function are determined so that the average and variance of the normalized criteria scores are equal to pre-specified constants. A real-world dataset is used to illustrate the advantages of the proposed normalization method.","PeriodicalId":255418,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Normalization Method for Using in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"authors\":\"R. Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A typical multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problem aims to rank a set of alternatives according to a set of criteria. The problem deals with selection of criteria, determination of criteria weights, normalization of criteria scores and aggregation of normalized criteria scores. The focus of this paper is on the normalization method. Most MCDA methods (e.g., AHP and TOPSIS) use a linear normalization method. Its main drawback is that the “magnitudes” of the normalized criteria scores of different criteria are different in terms of average. The difference in magnitude actually changes the relative importances of criteria so that the final rankings of alternatives may not appropriately reflect the preference of decision makers. To address this issue, a novel normalization method is proposed. The proposed normalization method uses a Gaussian value function to transform the criteria scores to interval (0, 1). The parameters of the value function are determined so that the average and variance of the normalized criteria scores are equal to pre-specified constants. A real-world dataset is used to illustrate the advantages of the proposed normalization method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一个典型的多准则决策分析(MCDA)问题的目的是根据一组标准对一组备选方案进行排序。该问题涉及标准的选择、标准权重的确定、标准分数的归一化和归一化标准分数的聚合。本文的研究重点是归一化方法。大多数MCDA方法(如AHP和TOPSIS)使用线性归一化方法。它的主要缺点是不同标准的归一化标准得分的“幅度”在平均值方面是不同的。量级上的差异实际上改变了标准的相对重要性,因此备选方案的最终排名可能无法恰当地反映决策者的偏好。为了解决这一问题,提出了一种新的归一化方法。提出的归一化方法使用高斯值函数将标准分数转换为区间(0,1)。确定值函数的参数,使归一化标准分数的平均值和方差等于预先指定的常数。一个真实的数据集被用来说明所提出的归一化方法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Normalization Method for Using in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
A typical multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problem aims to rank a set of alternatives according to a set of criteria. The problem deals with selection of criteria, determination of criteria weights, normalization of criteria scores and aggregation of normalized criteria scores. The focus of this paper is on the normalization method. Most MCDA methods (e.g., AHP and TOPSIS) use a linear normalization method. Its main drawback is that the “magnitudes” of the normalized criteria scores of different criteria are different in terms of average. The difference in magnitude actually changes the relative importances of criteria so that the final rankings of alternatives may not appropriately reflect the preference of decision makers. To address this issue, a novel normalization method is proposed. The proposed normalization method uses a Gaussian value function to transform the criteria scores to interval (0, 1). The parameters of the value function are determined so that the average and variance of the normalized criteria scores are equal to pre-specified constants. A real-world dataset is used to illustrate the advantages of the proposed normalization method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信