{"title":"理性","authors":"Windy Dryden","doi":"10.4324/9780429467066-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". When the works of Mâturîî are examined, he examined the important problems which were not discussed by his predecessors; it will be seen that it based its views on mental, transport, semantic, sociological and historical evidences that have not been used before and refutes the opposing ideas with the same methods and foundations. However, it is understood that he was aware of the scientific knowledge that existed in cities such as Rey, Nişabur and Belh by going to places which are the centers of science itself or by communication with the teachers coming from different regions. Mâturîdî, Abu Bakr b. b. Salih al-Juzcani, al-Ibrahim 260/874), Muqad al-Razi (d. 248/862), Nusayr b. 268/881), b. el-Juzcânî 285/898), as well as students of the students of the Imam-i Âzam took lessons from the Hanafi scholars. When his works are examined, it is understood that he not only benefited from his teachers and works written in the Islamic geography, but also examined the sources of other religions and sects in his time. In the Islamic thought, there is a conviction that Mu olduğtezile is the most used school of mind. From the Ehl-i Rey line, Hanafi-Mâturîdîlik is in a rational line as general attitude. When the Mu'tazilite sources written up to Mâturî and examined us, we think that the emphasis and rational basis of mind are weaker than those of Kitâbu't-Tevhid. In this sense, there is a balance between reason and thought in Mâturî thought. Mâturîdî developed a method against the Mu yettezile in the other, with the attitude of Ashâbuelll-Hadith / Salafiyya, who was content with the transfer, and did not neglect the nasses, but developed a method of balancing reason and transfer, which was based on rational basis of belief.","PeriodicalId":284944,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Vegetarianism","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationality\",\"authors\":\"Windy Dryden\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429467066-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". When the works of Mâturîî are examined, he examined the important problems which were not discussed by his predecessors; it will be seen that it based its views on mental, transport, semantic, sociological and historical evidences that have not been used before and refutes the opposing ideas with the same methods and foundations. However, it is understood that he was aware of the scientific knowledge that existed in cities such as Rey, Nişabur and Belh by going to places which are the centers of science itself or by communication with the teachers coming from different regions. Mâturîdî, Abu Bakr b. b. Salih al-Juzcani, al-Ibrahim 260/874), Muqad al-Razi (d. 248/862), Nusayr b. 268/881), b. el-Juzcânî 285/898), as well as students of the students of the Imam-i Âzam took lessons from the Hanafi scholars. When his works are examined, it is understood that he not only benefited from his teachers and works written in the Islamic geography, but also examined the sources of other religions and sects in his time. In the Islamic thought, there is a conviction that Mu olduğtezile is the most used school of mind. From the Ehl-i Rey line, Hanafi-Mâturîdîlik is in a rational line as general attitude. When the Mu'tazilite sources written up to Mâturî and examined us, we think that the emphasis and rational basis of mind are weaker than those of Kitâbu't-Tevhid. In this sense, there is a balance between reason and thought in Mâturî thought. Mâturîdî developed a method against the Mu yettezile in the other, with the attitude of Ashâbuelll-Hadith / Salafiyya, who was content with the transfer, and did not neglect the nasses, but developed a method of balancing reason and transfer, which was based on rational basis of belief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renaissance Vegetarianism\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renaissance Vegetarianism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467066-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Vegetarianism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467066-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
。当研究Mâturîî的作品时,他研究了前人没有讨论过的重要问题;可以看出,它的观点是建立在以前没有使用过的精神、运输、语义、社会学和历史证据的基础上的,用同样的方法和基础来反驳相反的观点。然而,据了解,他通过前往科学中心的地方或与来自不同地区的教师交流,了解了雷伊、niabur和贝尔赫等城市存在的科学知识。Mâturîdî, Abu Bakr b. b. Salih al-Juzcani, al-Ibrahim 260/874), Muqad al-Razi (248/862), Nusayr b. 268/881), b. el-Juzcânî 285/898),以及伊玛目-i学生的学生Âzam从哈纳菲学者那里学习。当我们审视他的作品时,我们发现他不仅受益于他的老师和伊斯兰地理学著作,而且还研究了他那个时代其他宗教和教派的资料来源。在伊斯兰思想中,有一种信念,即穆olduğtezile是最常用的思想流派。从伊雷线来看,哈纳菲-米 turd线总体上是持理性态度的。当Mu'tazilite的资料来源写信给Mâturî并检查我们时,我们认为思想的重点和理性基础比kit bu't-Tevhid的要弱。从这个意义上说,Mâturî思想中存在着理性与思想的平衡。Mâturîdî发展了一种对抗Mu yettezile的方法,以ash布尔-哈迪斯/萨拉菲亚的态度,他满足于转移,并没有忽视nass,而是发展了一种平衡理性和转移的方法,这是基于理性的信仰基础。
. When the works of Mâturîî are examined, he examined the important problems which were not discussed by his predecessors; it will be seen that it based its views on mental, transport, semantic, sociological and historical evidences that have not been used before and refutes the opposing ideas with the same methods and foundations. However, it is understood that he was aware of the scientific knowledge that existed in cities such as Rey, Nişabur and Belh by going to places which are the centers of science itself or by communication with the teachers coming from different regions. Mâturîdî, Abu Bakr b. b. Salih al-Juzcani, al-Ibrahim 260/874), Muqad al-Razi (d. 248/862), Nusayr b. 268/881), b. el-Juzcânî 285/898), as well as students of the students of the Imam-i Âzam took lessons from the Hanafi scholars. When his works are examined, it is understood that he not only benefited from his teachers and works written in the Islamic geography, but also examined the sources of other religions and sects in his time. In the Islamic thought, there is a conviction that Mu olduğtezile is the most used school of mind. From the Ehl-i Rey line, Hanafi-Mâturîdîlik is in a rational line as general attitude. When the Mu'tazilite sources written up to Mâturî and examined us, we think that the emphasis and rational basis of mind are weaker than those of Kitâbu't-Tevhid. In this sense, there is a balance between reason and thought in Mâturî thought. Mâturîdî developed a method against the Mu yettezile in the other, with the attitude of Ashâbuelll-Hadith / Salafiyya, who was content with the transfer, and did not neglect the nasses, but developed a method of balancing reason and transfer, which was based on rational basis of belief.