{"title":"Kepastian Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notariil Menjadi Akta Di Bawah Tangan Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama","authors":"A. Pratama, M. Takim, Rifkah Romiza Romiza","doi":"10.30652/rlj.v6i2.7956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wiralogam Company with Citi9 Property Indonesia made an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) for the development of the Tenaru 9 Project. Where in this agreement Wiralogam Company made a loan of IDR. 12.000.000.000,00 (two billion rupiah) to Citi9 Property Company Indonesia through the Notarial Deed of Agreement. However, there was a legal dispute where the owner of Wiralogam without the knowledge of the occurrence of retroactive notarial deed becomes under the hand. This resulted in alleged losses in which Wiralogam Company borrowed money with collateral in the form of land and shop houses covering an area of 20,450m2 (square) and it was as if the cancellation of the cooperation agreement was under the pretext of PT. Wiralogam failed to repay the debt based on what was agreed. This study uses legal research methodswitha statutory approach (status approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of this study explain that the application of the agreement under the hands and the date back without the knowledge of Wiralogam Company is an unlawful act on a contract which is contrary to the freedom to contract based on good faith as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) BW. However, the legal protection that must be carried out by PT. Wiralogam as the aggrieved party is to unilaterally cancel through the court on the basis of fundamental losses. Therefore, after the cancellation, a lawsuit against the law must be carried out on the contract as well as abuse of circumstances based on defects of will and deception on the basis of Article 1321 BW","PeriodicalId":138193,"journal":{"name":"Riau Law Journal","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Riau Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i2.7956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Wiralogam公司与Citi9 Property Indonesia就Tenaru 9项目的开发达成了运营合作协议(KSO)。在该协议中,维拉罗甘公司提供了一笔印尼盾的贷款。12.000.000.000,00(20亿印尼盾)通过公证协议授予Citi9 Property Company Indonesia。但是,在不知道追溯公证契约发生的情况下,Wiralogam的所有者成为了当事人,这是一场法律纠纷。这导致了所谓的损失,即Wiralogam公司以土地和商店房屋的形式抵押借款,面积为20,450平方米(平方),似乎以PT为借口取消了合作协议。Wiralogam未能根据协议偿还债务。本研究采用法律研究方法,包括法定方法(状态方法)、概念方法(概念方法)和案例方法(案例方法)。本研究的结果解释说,在Wiralogam公司不知情的情况下,在手上和日期下适用协议是一种非法的合同行为,违反了《英国法典》第1338条第(3)款规定的基于诚信的合同自由。然而,作为受害方的PT. Wiralogam必须履行的法律保护,是以基本损失为基础,通过法院单方面撤销。因此,在合同解除后,必须根据《合同法》第1321条的规定,对合同以及基于意志缺陷和欺骗的滥用情形提起诉讼
Kepastian Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notariil Menjadi Akta Di Bawah Tangan Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama
Wiralogam Company with Citi9 Property Indonesia made an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) for the development of the Tenaru 9 Project. Where in this agreement Wiralogam Company made a loan of IDR. 12.000.000.000,00 (two billion rupiah) to Citi9 Property Company Indonesia through the Notarial Deed of Agreement. However, there was a legal dispute where the owner of Wiralogam without the knowledge of the occurrence of retroactive notarial deed becomes under the hand. This resulted in alleged losses in which Wiralogam Company borrowed money with collateral in the form of land and shop houses covering an area of 20,450m2 (square) and it was as if the cancellation of the cooperation agreement was under the pretext of PT. Wiralogam failed to repay the debt based on what was agreed. This study uses legal research methodswitha statutory approach (status approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of this study explain that the application of the agreement under the hands and the date back without the knowledge of Wiralogam Company is an unlawful act on a contract which is contrary to the freedom to contract based on good faith as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) BW. However, the legal protection that must be carried out by PT. Wiralogam as the aggrieved party is to unilaterally cancel through the court on the basis of fundamental losses. Therefore, after the cancellation, a lawsuit against the law must be carried out on the contract as well as abuse of circumstances based on defects of will and deception on the basis of Article 1321 BW