基于时域特征的轴承故障分类机器学习方法性能比较

M. Doseděl, Z. Havránek
{"title":"基于时域特征的轴承故障分类机器学习方法性能比较","authors":"M. Doseděl, Z. Havránek","doi":"10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with comparison of a classification success rate of machine learning methods used for vibration signals captured on damaged bearing. The most significant and the most used methods suitable for this vibrodiagnostic field have been selected, namely support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and principal component analysis for reduction of a dimensionality of a features space. All the methods have been implemented in MATLAB and their performance has been analyzed using same input datasets. As the input for all the aforementioned methods, data from bearing shortened life-cycle test, done by Bearing Data Center at Case Western Reserve University, have been used. Intentionally, computationally intensive pre-processing procedures have been excluded from the computational chain, as only time domain features have been used for the classification process. Resulting from this study, a classification error rate, an execution time, an implementation difficulty and a robustness of the algorithm strongly differ among all the methods while using the same input data and the same number and type of the input extracted features.","PeriodicalId":166043,"journal":{"name":"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Bearing Faults Classification Using Time-Domain Features\",\"authors\":\"M. Doseděl, Z. Havránek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with comparison of a classification success rate of machine learning methods used for vibration signals captured on damaged bearing. The most significant and the most used methods suitable for this vibrodiagnostic field have been selected, namely support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and principal component analysis for reduction of a dimensionality of a features space. All the methods have been implemented in MATLAB and their performance has been analyzed using same input datasets. As the input for all the aforementioned methods, data from bearing shortened life-cycle test, done by Bearing Data Center at Case Western Reserve University, have been used. Intentionally, computationally intensive pre-processing procedures have been excluded from the computational chain, as only time domain features have been used for the classification process. Resulting from this study, a classification error rate, an execution time, an implementation difficulty and a robustness of the algorithm strongly differ among all the methods while using the same input data and the same number and type of the input extracted features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了机器学习方法对损坏轴承上捕获的振动信号的分类成功率。选择了适合该振动诊断领域的最重要和最常用的方法,即支持向量机、k近邻、Mahalanobis-Taguchi系统和特征空间降维的主成分分析。所有方法都在MATLAB中实现,并使用相同的输入数据集对其性能进行了分析。上述所有方法的输入均使用了凯斯西储大学轴承数据中心的轴承短寿命周期试验数据。有意地,计算密集的预处理过程被排除在计算链之外,因为只有时域特征被用于分类过程。研究结果表明,在使用相同输入数据、相同输入提取特征数量和类型的情况下,不同方法的分类错误率、执行时间、实现难度和鲁棒性存在较大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Bearing Faults Classification Using Time-Domain Features
This article deals with comparison of a classification success rate of machine learning methods used for vibration signals captured on damaged bearing. The most significant and the most used methods suitable for this vibrodiagnostic field have been selected, namely support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and principal component analysis for reduction of a dimensionality of a features space. All the methods have been implemented in MATLAB and their performance has been analyzed using same input datasets. As the input for all the aforementioned methods, data from bearing shortened life-cycle test, done by Bearing Data Center at Case Western Reserve University, have been used. Intentionally, computationally intensive pre-processing procedures have been excluded from the computational chain, as only time domain features have been used for the classification process. Resulting from this study, a classification error rate, an execution time, an implementation difficulty and a robustness of the algorithm strongly differ among all the methods while using the same input data and the same number and type of the input extracted features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信