安全状态处理

S. Price, S. Price
{"title":"安全状态处理","authors":"S. Price, S. Price","doi":"10.1109/IAW.2006.1652121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The information assurance (IA) model, an extension of the McCumber information security model, specifies security services for information when it is at rest, in transit, or being processed. According to the IA model, the processing information state is protected by technology, operations, and people security countermeasures. However, what has not been considered is the power wielded by an ordinary user over the processes in their environment. The authors consider people to be the principle countermeasure in the model. Unfortunately, this becomes problematic when users introduce unknown or unauthorized processes into a system which may affect information and the security services of the system. Indeed, such processes run with the rights and privileges of the user. The intentional or accidental execution of unauthorized applications epitomizes the insider threat. Therefore, system and data security is at the mercy of executing processes and the hands of the authorized user. Another way to represent this situation is to say that unknown and unauthorized processes, whether or not under the control of the user, change the secure state processing (SSP) of a system","PeriodicalId":326306,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE Information Assurance Workshop","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secure State Processing\",\"authors\":\"S. Price, S. Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IAW.2006.1652121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The information assurance (IA) model, an extension of the McCumber information security model, specifies security services for information when it is at rest, in transit, or being processed. According to the IA model, the processing information state is protected by technology, operations, and people security countermeasures. However, what has not been considered is the power wielded by an ordinary user over the processes in their environment. The authors consider people to be the principle countermeasure in the model. Unfortunately, this becomes problematic when users introduce unknown or unauthorized processes into a system which may affect information and the security services of the system. Indeed, such processes run with the rights and privileges of the user. The intentional or accidental execution of unauthorized applications epitomizes the insider threat. Therefore, system and data security is at the mercy of executing processes and the hands of the authorized user. Another way to represent this situation is to say that unknown and unauthorized processes, whether or not under the control of the user, change the secure state processing (SSP) of a system\",\"PeriodicalId\":326306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE Information Assurance Workshop\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE Information Assurance Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAW.2006.1652121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE Information Assurance Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAW.2006.1652121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

信息保证(IA)模型是McCumber信息安全模型的扩展,它为处于静止、传输或处理状态的信息指定了安全服务。根据IA模型,处理信息状态受到技术、操作和人员安全对策的保护。然而,没有考虑到的是普通用户对其环境中的进程所拥有的权力。在该模型中,作者认为人是主要的对策。不幸的是,当用户将未知或未经授权的进程引入系统时,这可能会影响系统的信息和安全服务,从而产生问题。实际上,这些进程是以用户的权限和特权运行的。故意或意外执行未经授权的应用程序是内部威胁的缩影。因此,系统和数据安全取决于执行进程和授权用户的控制。表示这种情况的另一种方式是说未知和未经授权的进程,无论是否在用户的控制下,都会更改系统的安全状态处理(SSP)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secure State Processing
The information assurance (IA) model, an extension of the McCumber information security model, specifies security services for information when it is at rest, in transit, or being processed. According to the IA model, the processing information state is protected by technology, operations, and people security countermeasures. However, what has not been considered is the power wielded by an ordinary user over the processes in their environment. The authors consider people to be the principle countermeasure in the model. Unfortunately, this becomes problematic when users introduce unknown or unauthorized processes into a system which may affect information and the security services of the system. Indeed, such processes run with the rights and privileges of the user. The intentional or accidental execution of unauthorized applications epitomizes the insider threat. Therefore, system and data security is at the mercy of executing processes and the hands of the authorized user. Another way to represent this situation is to say that unknown and unauthorized processes, whether or not under the control of the user, change the secure state processing (SSP) of a system
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信