关于柏拉图对神的理解的问题

A. Tikhonov, R. Frantsuzov
{"title":"关于柏拉图对神的理解的问题","authors":"A. Tikhonov, R. Frantsuzov","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-217-225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the consideration of such an aspect of Plato's philosophy as theology. Starting with the \"Platonic Theology\" of Proclus Diadochus, this point of view and the system of interpretation of philosophical research character continued to develop and refine a number of categories and ideas developed by Plato - Demiurge, ideas of \"mixing\", ideas of \"creation\", categories of paradigm (within the dispute about universals), etc. However, if we recognize the equality of the ontological status of the Demiurge, the paradigm and the created world (to whom the blessed god was given life), we come across a number of problems that are expressed not only in the understanding of the \"divine\" itself, but also in relation to what, within the framework of the \"theological\" view of Plato, can be called deified or divine images (Demiurge, paradigm and the created world). In this paper, an attempt will be made to demonstrate these contradictions, and to make a number of comments.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the problem of understanding of the divine by Plato\",\"authors\":\"A. Tikhonov, R. Frantsuzov\",\"doi\":\"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-217-225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to the consideration of such an aspect of Plato's philosophy as theology. Starting with the \\\"Platonic Theology\\\" of Proclus Diadochus, this point of view and the system of interpretation of philosophical research character continued to develop and refine a number of categories and ideas developed by Plato - Demiurge, ideas of \\\"mixing\\\", ideas of \\\"creation\\\", categories of paradigm (within the dispute about universals), etc. However, if we recognize the equality of the ontological status of the Demiurge, the paradigm and the created world (to whom the blessed god was given life), we come across a number of problems that are expressed not only in the understanding of the \\\"divine\\\" itself, but also in relation to what, within the framework of the \\\"theological\\\" view of Plato, can be called deified or divine images (Demiurge, paradigm and the created world). In this paper, an attempt will be made to demonstrate these contradictions, and to make a number of comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-217-225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-217-225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章致力于考虑柏拉图哲学的神学方面。从普罗克劳斯·戴亚多克斯的“柏拉图神学”开始,这一观点和哲学研究特征的解释系统继续发展和完善了柏拉图发展的一些范畴和思想-造物主,“混合”思想,“创造”思想,范式范畴(在关于共相的争论中)等。然而,如果我们承认造物主、范式和被创造的世界(上帝被赋予了生命)的本体论地位是平等的,我们就会遇到许多问题,这些问题不仅表现在对“神”本身的理解上,而且还表现在柏拉图“神学”观点的框架内,什么可以被称为神化或神圣的形象(造物主、范式和被创造的世界)。在本文中,我们将试图证明这些矛盾,并提出一些意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards the problem of understanding of the divine by Plato
This article is devoted to the consideration of such an aspect of Plato's philosophy as theology. Starting with the "Platonic Theology" of Proclus Diadochus, this point of view and the system of interpretation of philosophical research character continued to develop and refine a number of categories and ideas developed by Plato - Demiurge, ideas of "mixing", ideas of "creation", categories of paradigm (within the dispute about universals), etc. However, if we recognize the equality of the ontological status of the Demiurge, the paradigm and the created world (to whom the blessed god was given life), we come across a number of problems that are expressed not only in the understanding of the "divine" itself, but also in relation to what, within the framework of the "theological" view of Plato, can be called deified or divine images (Demiurge, paradigm and the created world). In this paper, an attempt will be made to demonstrate these contradictions, and to make a number of comments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信