TFCheck:用于检测神经网络程序中训练问题的TensorFlow库

Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh
{"title":"TFCheck:用于检测神经网络程序中训练问题的TensorFlow库","authors":"Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh","doi":"10.1109/QRS.2019.00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing inclusion of Machine Learning (ML) models in safety-critical systems like autonomous cars have led to the development of multiple model-based ML testing techniques. One common denominator of these testing techniques is their assumption that training programs are adequate and bug-free. These techniques only focus on assessing the performance of the constructed model using manually labeled data or automatically generated data. However, their assumptions about the training program are not always true as training programs can contain inconsistencies and bugs. In this paper, we examine training issues in ML programs and propose a catalog of verification routines that can be used to detect the identified issues, automatically. We implemented the routines in a Tensorflow-based library named TFCheck. Using TFCheck, practitioners can detect the aforementioned issues automatically. To assess the effectiveness of TFCheck, we conducted a case study with real-world, mutants, and synthetic training programs. Results show that TFCheck can successfully detect training issues in ML code implementations.","PeriodicalId":122665,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TFCheck : A TensorFlow Library for Detecting Training Issues in Neural Network Programs\",\"authors\":\"Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS.2019.00059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing inclusion of Machine Learning (ML) models in safety-critical systems like autonomous cars have led to the development of multiple model-based ML testing techniques. One common denominator of these testing techniques is their assumption that training programs are adequate and bug-free. These techniques only focus on assessing the performance of the constructed model using manually labeled data or automatically generated data. However, their assumptions about the training program are not always true as training programs can contain inconsistencies and bugs. In this paper, we examine training issues in ML programs and propose a catalog of verification routines that can be used to detect the identified issues, automatically. We implemented the routines in a Tensorflow-based library named TFCheck. Using TFCheck, practitioners can detect the aforementioned issues automatically. To assess the effectiveness of TFCheck, we conducted a case study with real-world, mutants, and synthetic training programs. Results show that TFCheck can successfully detect training issues in ML code implementations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2019.00059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2019.00059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

机器学习(ML)模型越来越多地包含在自动驾驶汽车等安全关键系统中,这导致了多种基于模型的ML测试技术的发展。这些测试技术的一个共同点是他们假设培训计划是足够的并且没有错误。这些技术只关注于使用手动标记的数据或自动生成的数据来评估构建模型的性能。然而,他们对培训计划的假设并不总是正确的,因为培训计划可能包含不一致和错误。在本文中,我们研究了机器学习程序中的训练问题,并提出了一个可用于自动检测已识别问题的验证例程目录。我们在一个名为TFCheck的基于tensorflow的库中实现了这些例程。使用TFCheck,从业者可以自动检测上述问题。为了评估TFCheck的有效性,我们对真实世界、突变体和合成训练项目进行了案例研究。结果表明,TFCheck可以成功地检测ML代码实现中的训练问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TFCheck : A TensorFlow Library for Detecting Training Issues in Neural Network Programs
The increasing inclusion of Machine Learning (ML) models in safety-critical systems like autonomous cars have led to the development of multiple model-based ML testing techniques. One common denominator of these testing techniques is their assumption that training programs are adequate and bug-free. These techniques only focus on assessing the performance of the constructed model using manually labeled data or automatically generated data. However, their assumptions about the training program are not always true as training programs can contain inconsistencies and bugs. In this paper, we examine training issues in ML programs and propose a catalog of verification routines that can be used to detect the identified issues, automatically. We implemented the routines in a Tensorflow-based library named TFCheck. Using TFCheck, practitioners can detect the aforementioned issues automatically. To assess the effectiveness of TFCheck, we conducted a case study with real-world, mutants, and synthetic training programs. Results show that TFCheck can successfully detect training issues in ML code implementations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信