开源软件项目中社区与设计气味关系的实证研究

Haris Mumtaz, Paramvir Singh, Kelly Blincoe
{"title":"开源软件项目中社区与设计气味关系的实证研究","authors":"Haris Mumtaz, Paramvir Singh, Kelly Blincoe","doi":"10.1145/3544902.3546249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Software smells reflect the sub-optimal patterns in the software. In a similar way, community smells consider the sub-optimal patterns in the organizational and social structures of software teams. Related work performed empirical studies to identify the relationship between community smells and software smells at the architecture and code levels. However, how community smells relate with design smells is still unknown. Aims: In this paper, we empirically investigate the relationship between community smells and design smells during the evolution of software projects. Method: We apply three statistical methods: correlation, trend, and information gain analysis to empirically examine the relationship between community and design smells in 100 releases of 10 large-scale Apache open-source software projects. Results: Our results reveal that the relationship between community and design smells varies across the analyzed projects. We find significant correlations and trend similarities for one type of community smell (when developers work in isolation without peer communication—Missing Links) with design smells in most of the analyzed projects. Furthermore, the results of our statistical model disclose that community smells are more relevant for design smells compared to other community-related factors. Conclusion: Our results find that the relationship of community smells (in particular, the Missing Links smell) exists with design smells. Based on our findings, we discuss specific community smell refactoring techniques that should be done together when refactoring design smells so that the problems associated with the social and technical (design) aspects of the projects can be managed concurrently.","PeriodicalId":220679,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Relationship between Community and Design Smells in Open-Source Software Projects: An Empirical Study\",\"authors\":\"Haris Mumtaz, Paramvir Singh, Kelly Blincoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3544902.3546249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Software smells reflect the sub-optimal patterns in the software. In a similar way, community smells consider the sub-optimal patterns in the organizational and social structures of software teams. Related work performed empirical studies to identify the relationship between community smells and software smells at the architecture and code levels. However, how community smells relate with design smells is still unknown. Aims: In this paper, we empirically investigate the relationship between community smells and design smells during the evolution of software projects. Method: We apply three statistical methods: correlation, trend, and information gain analysis to empirically examine the relationship between community and design smells in 100 releases of 10 large-scale Apache open-source software projects. Results: Our results reveal that the relationship between community and design smells varies across the analyzed projects. We find significant correlations and trend similarities for one type of community smell (when developers work in isolation without peer communication—Missing Links) with design smells in most of the analyzed projects. Furthermore, the results of our statistical model disclose that community smells are more relevant for design smells compared to other community-related factors. Conclusion: Our results find that the relationship of community smells (in particular, the Missing Links smell) exists with design smells. Based on our findings, we discuss specific community smell refactoring techniques that should be done together when refactoring design smells so that the problems associated with the social and technical (design) aspects of the projects can be managed concurrently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544902.3546249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544902.3546249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:软件气味反映了软件中的次优模式。以类似的方式,社区气味考虑软件团队的组织和社会结构中的次优模式。相关的工作进行了实证研究,以确定社区气味和软件气味在体系结构和代码级别之间的关系。然而,社区气味与设计气味之间的关系仍然未知。目的:本文对软件项目发展过程中社区气味和设计气味之间的关系进行了实证研究。方法:我们采用相关性、趋势和信息增益分析三种统计方法,对10个大型Apache开源软件项目的100个版本的社区和设计气味之间的关系进行了实证研究。结果:我们的结果揭示了社区和设计气味之间的关系在分析的项目中是不同的。我们发现,在大多数分析项目中,一种类型的社区气味(当开发人员在没有同级通信的情况下孤立工作时——缺失链接)与设计气味具有显著的相关性和趋势相似性。此外,我们的统计模型结果显示,与其他社区相关因素相比,社区气味与设计气味的相关性更大。结论:我们的研究结果发现社区气味(特别是Missing Links气味)与设计气味存在关系。根据我们的发现,我们讨论了特定的社区气味重构技术,这些技术在重构设计气味时应该一起完成,这样与项目的社会和技术(设计)方面相关的问题就可以同时管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the Relationship between Community and Design Smells in Open-Source Software Projects: An Empirical Study
Background: Software smells reflect the sub-optimal patterns in the software. In a similar way, community smells consider the sub-optimal patterns in the organizational and social structures of software teams. Related work performed empirical studies to identify the relationship between community smells and software smells at the architecture and code levels. However, how community smells relate with design smells is still unknown. Aims: In this paper, we empirically investigate the relationship between community smells and design smells during the evolution of software projects. Method: We apply three statistical methods: correlation, trend, and information gain analysis to empirically examine the relationship between community and design smells in 100 releases of 10 large-scale Apache open-source software projects. Results: Our results reveal that the relationship between community and design smells varies across the analyzed projects. We find significant correlations and trend similarities for one type of community smell (when developers work in isolation without peer communication—Missing Links) with design smells in most of the analyzed projects. Furthermore, the results of our statistical model disclose that community smells are more relevant for design smells compared to other community-related factors. Conclusion: Our results find that the relationship of community smells (in particular, the Missing Links smell) exists with design smells. Based on our findings, we discuss specific community smell refactoring techniques that should be done together when refactoring design smells so that the problems associated with the social and technical (design) aspects of the projects can be managed concurrently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信