共同创造不适合胆小的人

Brenda Longfellow
{"title":"共同创造不适合胆小的人","authors":"Brenda Longfellow","doi":"10.1525/aft.2020.471010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since , I have been developing a series of documentary projects on women and incarceration that embeds co-creation into its core methodological and political frame. This work is a collaboration between the Centre for Restorative Justice at Simon Fraser University (Vancouver, British Columbia) and the Immersive Storylab at York University (Toronto), co-directed by my research partner, Brenda Morrison, and myself. From the beginning, we understood that because of the very complex histories and unique social vulnerabilities of the women we would be working with, our process had to be deeply relational, networked, and organically collaborative, particularly as a substantial percentage of the women would be Indigenous. In Canada, although Indigenous women account for less than  percent of the female population, they make up  percent of women in federal institutions and – percent of women in some provincial, territorial, and remand centers. As criminologist Lisa Monchalin (Algonquin, Métis) argues, Canada’s criminal justice system is “rooted in Euro-Canadian colonialism [and] fuels injustice that is directed specifically against Indigenous peoples.” With our limited funding, we were not ready to initiate the rigorous bureaucratic and unpredictable process of requesting security clearances and access to currently incarcerated women. We felt that listening to formerly incarcerated women’s stories would thus provide crucial immersion to help us design the “real” project we would propose in writing our grant applications. We launched a call on social media. For our first circle in September , nine women showed up to the tiny cramped quarters of a woman’s center in East Vancouver. Since then, our circle has grown to include a lively group of Indigenous (multiple nations) and nonIndigenous women. Our collaborators invite others. We continue to post photos and news of our circle on Facebook, a critical site and much loved platform for formerly incarcerated women who were once exiled from social and worldly connections. Indigenous elders or community members facilitate these circles. The talking circle is a dynamic and profoundly nonhierarchical process that has been central to Indigenous community life for millennia. Restorative justice and social justice","PeriodicalId":443446,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creation Is Not for the Faint of Heart\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Longfellow\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/aft.2020.471010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since , I have been developing a series of documentary projects on women and incarceration that embeds co-creation into its core methodological and political frame. This work is a collaboration between the Centre for Restorative Justice at Simon Fraser University (Vancouver, British Columbia) and the Immersive Storylab at York University (Toronto), co-directed by my research partner, Brenda Morrison, and myself. From the beginning, we understood that because of the very complex histories and unique social vulnerabilities of the women we would be working with, our process had to be deeply relational, networked, and organically collaborative, particularly as a substantial percentage of the women would be Indigenous. In Canada, although Indigenous women account for less than  percent of the female population, they make up  percent of women in federal institutions and – percent of women in some provincial, territorial, and remand centers. As criminologist Lisa Monchalin (Algonquin, Métis) argues, Canada’s criminal justice system is “rooted in Euro-Canadian colonialism [and] fuels injustice that is directed specifically against Indigenous peoples.” With our limited funding, we were not ready to initiate the rigorous bureaucratic and unpredictable process of requesting security clearances and access to currently incarcerated women. We felt that listening to formerly incarcerated women’s stories would thus provide crucial immersion to help us design the “real” project we would propose in writing our grant applications. We launched a call on social media. For our first circle in September , nine women showed up to the tiny cramped quarters of a woman’s center in East Vancouver. Since then, our circle has grown to include a lively group of Indigenous (multiple nations) and nonIndigenous women. Our collaborators invite others. We continue to post photos and news of our circle on Facebook, a critical site and much loved platform for formerly incarcerated women who were once exiled from social and worldly connections. Indigenous elders or community members facilitate these circles. The talking circle is a dynamic and profoundly nonhierarchical process that has been central to Indigenous community life for millennia. Restorative justice and social justice\",\"PeriodicalId\":443446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/aft.2020.471010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/aft.2020.471010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自以来,我一直在开发一系列关于妇女和监禁的纪录片项目,将共同创造嵌入其核心方法和政治框架。这项工作是西蒙弗雷泽大学(不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华)恢复性司法中心和约克大学(多伦多)沉浸式故事实验室的合作,由我的研究伙伴布兰达莫里森和我共同指导。从一开始,我们就明白,由于我们将与之合作的妇女有着非常复杂的历史和独特的社会脆弱性,我们的过程必须是密切相关的,网络化的,有机合作的,特别是因为相当大比例的妇女是土著妇女。在加拿大,虽然土著妇女在女性人口中所占比例不到%,但她们在联邦机构中所占比例为%,在一些省、地区和羁押中心中所占比例为-%。正如犯罪学家Lisa Monchalin (Algonquin, msamutis)所说,加拿大的刑事司法系统“根植于欧洲-加拿大殖民主义,助长了特别针对土著人民的不公正。”由于我们的资金有限,我们还没有准备好启动严格的官僚程序和不可预测的程序,要求安全审查和接触目前被监禁的妇女。我们觉得,倾听曾经被监禁过的女性的故事将提供至关重要的沉浸感,帮助我们设计“真正的”项目,我们将在撰写资助申请时提出。我们在社交媒体上发起了呼吁。我们9月的第一个圈子是,九名女性出现在东温哥华一个女性中心狭小的空间里。从那时起,我们的圈子已经发展成为一个由土著(多个国家)和非土著妇女组成的活跃团体。我们的合作者邀请其他人。我们继续在Facebook上发布我们圈子的照片和新闻,这是一个重要的网站,也是一个深受喜爱的平台,为曾经被监禁的女性服务,她们曾经被驱逐出社会和世俗的联系。土著长老或社区成员促进这些圈子。谈话圈是一个动态的、深刻的无等级的过程,几千年来一直是土著社区生活的核心。恢复性司法和社会正义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-creation Is Not for the Faint of Heart
Since , I have been developing a series of documentary projects on women and incarceration that embeds co-creation into its core methodological and political frame. This work is a collaboration between the Centre for Restorative Justice at Simon Fraser University (Vancouver, British Columbia) and the Immersive Storylab at York University (Toronto), co-directed by my research partner, Brenda Morrison, and myself. From the beginning, we understood that because of the very complex histories and unique social vulnerabilities of the women we would be working with, our process had to be deeply relational, networked, and organically collaborative, particularly as a substantial percentage of the women would be Indigenous. In Canada, although Indigenous women account for less than  percent of the female population, they make up  percent of women in federal institutions and – percent of women in some provincial, territorial, and remand centers. As criminologist Lisa Monchalin (Algonquin, Métis) argues, Canada’s criminal justice system is “rooted in Euro-Canadian colonialism [and] fuels injustice that is directed specifically against Indigenous peoples.” With our limited funding, we were not ready to initiate the rigorous bureaucratic and unpredictable process of requesting security clearances and access to currently incarcerated women. We felt that listening to formerly incarcerated women’s stories would thus provide crucial immersion to help us design the “real” project we would propose in writing our grant applications. We launched a call on social media. For our first circle in September , nine women showed up to the tiny cramped quarters of a woman’s center in East Vancouver. Since then, our circle has grown to include a lively group of Indigenous (multiple nations) and nonIndigenous women. Our collaborators invite others. We continue to post photos and news of our circle on Facebook, a critical site and much loved platform for formerly incarcerated women who were once exiled from social and worldly connections. Indigenous elders or community members facilitate these circles. The talking circle is a dynamic and profoundly nonhierarchical process that has been central to Indigenous community life for millennia. Restorative justice and social justice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信