在专家的王国里,亵渎者为王。医学创新载体

B. Dardelet
{"title":"在专家的王国里,亵渎者为王。医学创新载体","authors":"B. Dardelet","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2001.926566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an attempt at understanding the embeddedness of heterogeneous actors in the emerging field of telemedicine, I identify actors who possess medical knowledge (classified as \"experts\"), as well as other actors (classified as \"profanes\") who control technology (which is another form of knowledge). Currently, both sets of actors are merged and are involved in the creation of what may be seen as a social construction of medical innovation. This dichotomy between profanes and experts is analysed by following several recent French telemedicine programmes. In this paper, I identify the actors, typologies and trajectories of these programmes. The analysis then proceeds to determine how the localization of innovation influences its evolution and provides the identity of a heterogeneous actor network. In conclusion, I present trajectories between medical knowledge and technical know-how within a broader social dimension, where arenas are built beyond the initial users and where past conventions challenge the affinity between the profanes' status and the experts' value.","PeriodicalId":201648,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the kingdom of expertness, the profane is king. Carriers of medical innovations\",\"authors\":\"B. Dardelet\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2001.926566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an attempt at understanding the embeddedness of heterogeneous actors in the emerging field of telemedicine, I identify actors who possess medical knowledge (classified as \\\"experts\\\"), as well as other actors (classified as \\\"profanes\\\") who control technology (which is another form of knowledge). Currently, both sets of actors are merged and are involved in the creation of what may be seen as a social construction of medical innovation. This dichotomy between profanes and experts is analysed by following several recent French telemedicine programmes. In this paper, I identify the actors, typologies and trajectories of these programmes. The analysis then proceeds to determine how the localization of innovation influences its evolution and provides the identity of a heterogeneous actor network. In conclusion, I present trajectories between medical knowledge and technical know-how within a broader social dimension, where arenas are built beyond the initial users and where past conventions challenge the affinity between the profanes' status and the experts' value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在试图理解异质行为者在新兴远程医疗领域的嵌入性时,我确定了拥有医学知识的行为者(归类为“专家”),以及控制技术(这是另一种形式的知识)的其他行为者(归类为“亵渎者”)。目前,这两组参与者被合并,并参与了可能被视为医疗创新的社会建构的创造。通过跟踪法国最近的几个远程医疗项目,分析了世俗者和专家之间的这种二分法。在本文中,我确定了这些节目的演员,类型和轨迹。然后,分析进一步确定创新的本地化如何影响其演变,并提供异构行为者网络的身份。最后,我提出了在更广泛的社会维度中医学知识和技术知识之间的轨迹,其中竞技场建立在最初用户之外,过去的惯例挑战了亵渎者地位与专家价值之间的亲和力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the kingdom of expertness, the profane is king. Carriers of medical innovations
In an attempt at understanding the embeddedness of heterogeneous actors in the emerging field of telemedicine, I identify actors who possess medical knowledge (classified as "experts"), as well as other actors (classified as "profanes") who control technology (which is another form of knowledge). Currently, both sets of actors are merged and are involved in the creation of what may be seen as a social construction of medical innovation. This dichotomy between profanes and experts is analysed by following several recent French telemedicine programmes. In this paper, I identify the actors, typologies and trajectories of these programmes. The analysis then proceeds to determine how the localization of innovation influences its evolution and provides the identity of a heterogeneous actor network. In conclusion, I present trajectories between medical knowledge and technical know-how within a broader social dimension, where arenas are built beyond the initial users and where past conventions challenge the affinity between the profanes' status and the experts' value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信