美德伦理、情境主义与诡辩:走向超越典范的数字伦理

Bastiaan Vanacker
{"title":"美德伦理、情境主义与诡辩:走向超越典范的数字伦理","authors":"Bastiaan Vanacker","doi":"10.1108/jices-12-2020-0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to propose an ethical approach best suited to dealing with the issues of digital ethics in general and internet research ethics in particular.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis article engages with the existing literature on virtue ethics, situationism and digital (research) ethics.\n\n\nFindings\nA virtue-based casuistic method could be well-suited to deal with issues relating to digital ethics in general and internet research ethics in particular as long as it can take place in communities with shared practices and traditions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese insights could add and further deepen the rich debate about research ethics that is already ongoing within the internet research community.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"419 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtue ethics, situationism and casuistry: toward a digital ethics beyond exemplars\",\"authors\":\"Bastiaan Vanacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jices-12-2020-0126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to propose an ethical approach best suited to dealing with the issues of digital ethics in general and internet research ethics in particular.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis article engages with the existing literature on virtue ethics, situationism and digital (research) ethics.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nA virtue-based casuistic method could be well-suited to deal with issues relating to digital ethics in general and internet research ethics in particular as long as it can take place in communities with shared practices and traditions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThese insights could add and further deepen the rich debate about research ethics that is already ongoing within the internet research community.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":156416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"volume\":\"419 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-12-2020-0126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-12-2020-0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在提出一种最适合处理一般数字伦理问题和特别是互联网研究伦理问题的伦理方法。设计/方法/途径本文涉及美德伦理学、情境主义和数字(研究)伦理学的现有文献。基于虚拟的诡辩方法可能非常适合处理与数字伦理有关的问题,特别是与互联网研究伦理有关的问题,只要它可以在具有共同实践和传统的社区中进行。原创性/价值这些见解可能会增加并进一步深化已经在互联网研究界进行的关于研究伦理的丰富辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtue ethics, situationism and casuistry: toward a digital ethics beyond exemplars
Purpose This paper aims to propose an ethical approach best suited to dealing with the issues of digital ethics in general and internet research ethics in particular. Design/methodology/approach This article engages with the existing literature on virtue ethics, situationism and digital (research) ethics. Findings A virtue-based casuistic method could be well-suited to deal with issues relating to digital ethics in general and internet research ethics in particular as long as it can take place in communities with shared practices and traditions. Originality/value These insights could add and further deepen the rich debate about research ethics that is already ongoing within the internet research community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信