多光谱人脸识别与多模态分数融合研究综述

Yufeng Zheng, Adel Said Elmaghraby
{"title":"多光谱人脸识别与多模态分数融合研究综述","authors":"Yufeng Zheng, Adel Said Elmaghraby","doi":"10.1109/ISSPIT.2011.6151622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we explore and compare four face recognition methods and their performance with multispectral face images, and further investigate the performance improvement using multimodal score fusion. The four face recognition methods include three classical methods, PCA, LDA and EBGM (elastic bunch graph matching), and one new method, FPB (face pattern byte). The FPB method actually extracts orientational facial features by Gabor wavelet transform and uses Hamming distance for face identification. When the multispectral images from the same subject are available, the identification accuracy and reliability can be significantly enhanced using score fusion. Four score fusion methods, mean fusion, LDA fusion, KNN (k-nearest neighbor) fusion, and HMM (hidden Markov model) fusion are implemented and compared. Our experiments are conducted with the ASUMS face database that currently consists of two-band images (visible and thermal) from 96 subjects. We compare the identification performance of applying the four recognition methods to the two-band face images, and compare the fusion performance of combing the multiple scores from different methods (matcher) and from different bands (modality) of face images. The experimental results show that the face identification rate can achieve 100% when fusing two FPB scores from two-band face images; overall, the FPB method performs the best; the score modality is a key factor in biometric score fusion; when the number of score modalities is fixed, the fusion method becomes next important factor to score fusion; and the HMM fusion is the most reliable score fusion method.","PeriodicalId":288042,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief survey on multispectral face recognition and multimodal score fusion\",\"authors\":\"Yufeng Zheng, Adel Said Elmaghraby\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSPIT.2011.6151622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we explore and compare four face recognition methods and their performance with multispectral face images, and further investigate the performance improvement using multimodal score fusion. The four face recognition methods include three classical methods, PCA, LDA and EBGM (elastic bunch graph matching), and one new method, FPB (face pattern byte). The FPB method actually extracts orientational facial features by Gabor wavelet transform and uses Hamming distance for face identification. When the multispectral images from the same subject are available, the identification accuracy and reliability can be significantly enhanced using score fusion. Four score fusion methods, mean fusion, LDA fusion, KNN (k-nearest neighbor) fusion, and HMM (hidden Markov model) fusion are implemented and compared. Our experiments are conducted with the ASUMS face database that currently consists of two-band images (visible and thermal) from 96 subjects. We compare the identification performance of applying the four recognition methods to the two-band face images, and compare the fusion performance of combing the multiple scores from different methods (matcher) and from different bands (modality) of face images. The experimental results show that the face identification rate can achieve 100% when fusing two FPB scores from two-band face images; overall, the FPB method performs the best; the score modality is a key factor in biometric score fusion; when the number of score modalities is fixed, the fusion method becomes next important factor to score fusion; and the HMM fusion is the most reliable score fusion method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2011.6151622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2011.6151622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

在本文中,我们探索和比较了四种人脸识别方法及其在多光谱人脸图像上的性能,并进一步研究了多模态分数融合对性能的改善。这四种人脸识别方法包括三种经典方法PCA、LDA和EBGM(弹性束图匹配),以及一种新的人脸模式字节法FPB (face pattern byte)。FPB方法实际上是通过Gabor小波变换提取人脸的方向特征,并利用汉明距离进行人脸识别。当同一主体的多光谱图像同时存在时,采用分数融合可以显著提高识别的准确性和可靠性。实现并比较了均值融合、LDA融合、k近邻融合和隐马尔可夫模型融合四种评分融合方法。我们的实验是在ASUMS人脸数据库中进行的,该数据库目前由来自96名受试者的两波段图像(可见光和热成像)组成。比较了四种识别方法对两波段人脸图像的识别性能,比较了不同方法(匹配器)和不同波段(模态)人脸图像的多重分数的融合性能。实验结果表明,融合两波段人脸图像的两个FPB分数后,人脸识别率可达到100%;总体而言,FPB方法性能最好;评分方式是生物特征评分融合的关键因素;当评分模式数量固定时,融合方法成为评分融合的下一个重要因素;HMM融合是最可靠的分数融合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A brief survey on multispectral face recognition and multimodal score fusion
In this paper, we explore and compare four face recognition methods and their performance with multispectral face images, and further investigate the performance improvement using multimodal score fusion. The four face recognition methods include three classical methods, PCA, LDA and EBGM (elastic bunch graph matching), and one new method, FPB (face pattern byte). The FPB method actually extracts orientational facial features by Gabor wavelet transform and uses Hamming distance for face identification. When the multispectral images from the same subject are available, the identification accuracy and reliability can be significantly enhanced using score fusion. Four score fusion methods, mean fusion, LDA fusion, KNN (k-nearest neighbor) fusion, and HMM (hidden Markov model) fusion are implemented and compared. Our experiments are conducted with the ASUMS face database that currently consists of two-band images (visible and thermal) from 96 subjects. We compare the identification performance of applying the four recognition methods to the two-band face images, and compare the fusion performance of combing the multiple scores from different methods (matcher) and from different bands (modality) of face images. The experimental results show that the face identification rate can achieve 100% when fusing two FPB scores from two-band face images; overall, the FPB method performs the best; the score modality is a key factor in biometric score fusion; when the number of score modalities is fixed, the fusion method becomes next important factor to score fusion; and the HMM fusion is the most reliable score fusion method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信