一级创伤中心创伤患者分诊不足的相关因素

Ibrahim Al Babtain, Mohammed Alnasser, Abrar Dohaim, Sahar H Alomar
{"title":"一级创伤中心创伤患者分诊不足的相关因素","authors":"Ibrahim Al Babtain, Mohammed Alnasser, Abrar Dohaim, Sahar H Alomar","doi":"10.4103/ssj.ssj_88_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Applying American College of Surgeons Trauma Team Activation (TTA) criteria could improve trauma system outcomes and minimize both overtriage and undertriage of trauma patients. However, a percentage of trauma patients might slip through the system and become undertriaged. Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate factors related to undertriage of trauma patients at level 1 trauma center. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Setting and Subjects: We included all trauma patients at a level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Methods and Main Outcome Measures: We compared those who received TTA after 5 min of their arrival to emergency department (ED) (undertriaged cohort) to those who received no TTA (properly triaged cohort) in terms of demographic, anatomical, and physiological factors as well as injury severity assessment. Results: A total of 3740 trauma patients were included; 3330 (89%) were appropriately triaged and needed no TTA while 410 (10.9%) were undertriaged. In multivariate logistic regression model, the following factors were significantly associated with undertriage: arriving to ED in weekends (odd ratio, 1.417, confidence interval [CI] 95%, 1.047–1.916), motorcycle accidents (odds ratio, 3.709, 95% CI, 1.422–9.671), pedestrian victims (odds ratio, 7.477, 95% CI, 3.048–18.341), heart rate <60 (odds ratio, 2.657, 95% CI, 1.083–6.522), systolic blood pressure 76–89 (odds ratio, 4.235, 95% CI, 1.596–11.235), and Glasgow coma scale 9–12 (odds ratio, 4.365, 95% CI, 2.747–6.936). Conclusion: This study displayed different factors predictive of delayed TTA. Recognizing these factors could improve patient outcomes. Limitations: Poor prehospital documentation and communication from emergency medical services and a large number of missing data.","PeriodicalId":420307,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Surgical Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with undertriage of trauma patients at level 1 trauma center\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Al Babtain, Mohammed Alnasser, Abrar Dohaim, Sahar H Alomar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ssj.ssj_88_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Applying American College of Surgeons Trauma Team Activation (TTA) criteria could improve trauma system outcomes and minimize both overtriage and undertriage of trauma patients. However, a percentage of trauma patients might slip through the system and become undertriaged. Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate factors related to undertriage of trauma patients at level 1 trauma center. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Setting and Subjects: We included all trauma patients at a level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Methods and Main Outcome Measures: We compared those who received TTA after 5 min of their arrival to emergency department (ED) (undertriaged cohort) to those who received no TTA (properly triaged cohort) in terms of demographic, anatomical, and physiological factors as well as injury severity assessment. Results: A total of 3740 trauma patients were included; 3330 (89%) were appropriately triaged and needed no TTA while 410 (10.9%) were undertriaged. In multivariate logistic regression model, the following factors were significantly associated with undertriage: arriving to ED in weekends (odd ratio, 1.417, confidence interval [CI] 95%, 1.047–1.916), motorcycle accidents (odds ratio, 3.709, 95% CI, 1.422–9.671), pedestrian victims (odds ratio, 7.477, 95% CI, 3.048–18.341), heart rate <60 (odds ratio, 2.657, 95% CI, 1.083–6.522), systolic blood pressure 76–89 (odds ratio, 4.235, 95% CI, 1.596–11.235), and Glasgow coma scale 9–12 (odds ratio, 4.365, 95% CI, 2.747–6.936). Conclusion: This study displayed different factors predictive of delayed TTA. Recognizing these factors could improve patient outcomes. Limitations: Poor prehospital documentation and communication from emergency medical services and a large number of missing data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Surgical Journal\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Surgical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ssj.ssj_88_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Surgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ssj.ssj_88_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应用美国外科医师学会创伤小组激活(TTA)标准可以改善创伤系统的预后,并最大限度地减少创伤患者的过度分类和分类不足。然而,一定比例的创伤患者可能会从系统中溜出来,并被忽视。目的:探讨一级创伤中心创伤患者分诊不足的相关因素。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究。环境和对象:我们纳入了2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日在一级创伤中心的所有创伤患者。方法和主要结果测量:我们比较了到达急诊科(ED) 5分钟后接受TTA的患者(分类不足的队列)和未接受TTA的患者(分类适当的队列)在人口统计学、解剖学和生理因素以及损伤严重程度评估方面的差异。结果:共纳入3740例创伤患者;3330例(89%)分诊适当,不需要治疗;410例(10.9%)分诊不足。在多元logistic回归模型中,以下因素与undertriage显著相关:周末到达急诊科(奇比,1.417,可信区间[CI] 95%, 1.047-1.916),摩托车事故(优势比,3.709,95% CI, 1.422-9.671),行人受害者(优势比,7.477,95% CI, 3.048-18.341),心率<60(优势比,2.657,95% CI, 1.083-6.522),收缩压76-89(优势比,4.235,95% CI, 1.596-11.235),格拉斯哥昏迷量表9-12(优势比,4.365,95% CI, 2.777 - 6.936)。结论:本研究显示了延迟性TTA的不同预测因素。认识到这些因素可以改善患者的治疗效果。局限性:院前记录和紧急医疗服务沟通差,数据大量缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with undertriage of trauma patients at level 1 trauma center
Background: Applying American College of Surgeons Trauma Team Activation (TTA) criteria could improve trauma system outcomes and minimize both overtriage and undertriage of trauma patients. However, a percentage of trauma patients might slip through the system and become undertriaged. Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate factors related to undertriage of trauma patients at level 1 trauma center. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Setting and Subjects: We included all trauma patients at a level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Methods and Main Outcome Measures: We compared those who received TTA after 5 min of their arrival to emergency department (ED) (undertriaged cohort) to those who received no TTA (properly triaged cohort) in terms of demographic, anatomical, and physiological factors as well as injury severity assessment. Results: A total of 3740 trauma patients were included; 3330 (89%) were appropriately triaged and needed no TTA while 410 (10.9%) were undertriaged. In multivariate logistic regression model, the following factors were significantly associated with undertriage: arriving to ED in weekends (odd ratio, 1.417, confidence interval [CI] 95%, 1.047–1.916), motorcycle accidents (odds ratio, 3.709, 95% CI, 1.422–9.671), pedestrian victims (odds ratio, 7.477, 95% CI, 3.048–18.341), heart rate <60 (odds ratio, 2.657, 95% CI, 1.083–6.522), systolic blood pressure 76–89 (odds ratio, 4.235, 95% CI, 1.596–11.235), and Glasgow coma scale 9–12 (odds ratio, 4.365, 95% CI, 2.747–6.936). Conclusion: This study displayed different factors predictive of delayed TTA. Recognizing these factors could improve patient outcomes. Limitations: Poor prehospital documentation and communication from emergency medical services and a large number of missing data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信