04.6在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省COVID-19大流行期间,更多地使用基于互联网的性传播感染和血源性感染检测

H. Pedersen, Aidan Ablona, D. Haag, H. Change, E. Korol, S. Bannar-Martin, J. Wong, T. Grennan, M. Gilbert
{"title":"04.6在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省COVID-19大流行期间,更多地使用基于互联网的性传播感染和血源性感染检测","authors":"H. Pedersen, Aidan Ablona, D. Haag, H. Change, E. Korol, S. Bannar-Martin, J. Wong, T. Grennan, M. Gilbert","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2021-sti.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundGetCheckedOnline is a publicly-funded internet-based testing service for sexually-transmitted and blood borne infections (STBBI) offered in British Columbia (BC), Canada since 2014. GetCheckedOnline has remained accessible since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic response, despite many in-person sexual healthcare services having been reduced or stopped. GetCheckedOnline users complete an online risk assessment to inform STBBI test recommendations, auto-generating a lab requisition which can be used at any participating laboratory location, with results available online or by phone. Our objective was to describe GetCheckedOnline program utilization and selected risk factors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.ApproachWe used linked GetCheckedOnline program and laboratory testing data for this analysis. We compared the mean of selected monthly program measures during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 – December 2020) to the same time period the previous year, defined as pre-pandemic (March 2019 – December 2019). Descriptive statistics are presented.OutcomesThe median number of monthly test episodes completed was higher during the pandemic (median=1088;n=9470 total episodes completed), compared to pre-pandemic (median=824, n=8237 total episodes completed), despite a sharp decline and rapid recovery in March-May 2020. During the pandemic, the mean proportion of test episodes completed by those using GetCheckedOnline for the first time was 57%;an increase from pre-pandemic (51%). We observed an increase in the percent positivity during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (6.44% vs. 5.72%), as well as in the mean proportion of those reporting symptoms (20.3% vs 19.4%) or being a contact to someone with an STBBI (11.0% vs 9.3%).Innovation and SignificanceThe increase in first time GetCheckedOnline testers, percent positivity, and those reporting symptoms or being a contact to an STBBI during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest the program has filled a gap in STBBI testing services, and remains a critical service for accessing sexual healthcare.","PeriodicalId":422365,"journal":{"name":"COVID – epidemiology & health services impacts","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O04.6 Increased use of internet-based testing for sexually-transmitted and bloodborne infections during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada\",\"authors\":\"H. Pedersen, Aidan Ablona, D. Haag, H. Change, E. Korol, S. Bannar-Martin, J. Wong, T. Grennan, M. Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-2021-sti.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundGetCheckedOnline is a publicly-funded internet-based testing service for sexually-transmitted and blood borne infections (STBBI) offered in British Columbia (BC), Canada since 2014. GetCheckedOnline has remained accessible since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic response, despite many in-person sexual healthcare services having been reduced or stopped. GetCheckedOnline users complete an online risk assessment to inform STBBI test recommendations, auto-generating a lab requisition which can be used at any participating laboratory location, with results available online or by phone. Our objective was to describe GetCheckedOnline program utilization and selected risk factors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.ApproachWe used linked GetCheckedOnline program and laboratory testing data for this analysis. We compared the mean of selected monthly program measures during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 – December 2020) to the same time period the previous year, defined as pre-pandemic (March 2019 – December 2019). Descriptive statistics are presented.OutcomesThe median number of monthly test episodes completed was higher during the pandemic (median=1088;n=9470 total episodes completed), compared to pre-pandemic (median=824, n=8237 total episodes completed), despite a sharp decline and rapid recovery in March-May 2020. During the pandemic, the mean proportion of test episodes completed by those using GetCheckedOnline for the first time was 57%;an increase from pre-pandemic (51%). We observed an increase in the percent positivity during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (6.44% vs. 5.72%), as well as in the mean proportion of those reporting symptoms (20.3% vs 19.4%) or being a contact to someone with an STBBI (11.0% vs 9.3%).Innovation and SignificanceThe increase in first time GetCheckedOnline testers, percent positivity, and those reporting symptoms or being a contact to an STBBI during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest the program has filled a gap in STBBI testing services, and remains a critical service for accessing sexual healthcare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COVID – epidemiology & health services impacts\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COVID – epidemiology & health services impacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-sti.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID – epidemiology & health services impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-sti.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

getcheckedonline是一个公共资助的基于互联网的性传播和血源性感染(STBBI)检测服务,自2014年起在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)提供。自COVID-19大流行应对工作开始以来,尽管许多面对面的性保健服务已经减少或停止,但GetCheckedOnline仍然可以访问。GetCheckedOnline用户完成在线风险评估,通知STBBI测试建议,自动生成实验室申请单,可在任何参与实验室地点使用,结果可在线或通过电话获得。我们的目标是描述在COVID-19大流行之前和期间GetCheckedOnline计划的使用情况和选定的风险因素。方法:我们使用链接的GetCheckedOnline程序和实验室测试数据进行分析。我们将2019冠状病毒病大流行期间(2020年3月至2020年12月)选定的月度规划措施的平均值与前一年同期(定义为大流行前(2019年3月至2019年12月))进行了比较。给出了描述性统计。结果:尽管在2020年3月至5月期间急剧下降并迅速恢复,但与大流行前(中位数=824,n=8237,总完成病例数)相比,大流行期间完成的每月检测病例数中位数(中位数=1088,总完成病例数n=9470)更高。在大流行期间,首次使用GetCheckedOnline的人完成检测的平均比例为57%,比大流行前(51%)有所增加。我们观察到,与大流行前相比,大流行期间的阳性百分比有所增加(6.44%对5.72%),报告症状的人的平均比例(20.3%对19.4%)或与STBBI患者接触的人的平均比例(11.0%对9.3%)也有所增加。创新和意义在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,GetCheckedOnline首次测试者、阳性百分比以及报告症状或接触STBBI的人数的增加表明,该项目填补了STBBI测试服务的空白,仍然是获得性保健的关键服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O04.6 Increased use of internet-based testing for sexually-transmitted and bloodborne infections during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada
BackgroundGetCheckedOnline is a publicly-funded internet-based testing service for sexually-transmitted and blood borne infections (STBBI) offered in British Columbia (BC), Canada since 2014. GetCheckedOnline has remained accessible since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic response, despite many in-person sexual healthcare services having been reduced or stopped. GetCheckedOnline users complete an online risk assessment to inform STBBI test recommendations, auto-generating a lab requisition which can be used at any participating laboratory location, with results available online or by phone. Our objective was to describe GetCheckedOnline program utilization and selected risk factors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.ApproachWe used linked GetCheckedOnline program and laboratory testing data for this analysis. We compared the mean of selected monthly program measures during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 – December 2020) to the same time period the previous year, defined as pre-pandemic (March 2019 – December 2019). Descriptive statistics are presented.OutcomesThe median number of monthly test episodes completed was higher during the pandemic (median=1088;n=9470 total episodes completed), compared to pre-pandemic (median=824, n=8237 total episodes completed), despite a sharp decline and rapid recovery in March-May 2020. During the pandemic, the mean proportion of test episodes completed by those using GetCheckedOnline for the first time was 57%;an increase from pre-pandemic (51%). We observed an increase in the percent positivity during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (6.44% vs. 5.72%), as well as in the mean proportion of those reporting symptoms (20.3% vs 19.4%) or being a contact to someone with an STBBI (11.0% vs 9.3%).Innovation and SignificanceThe increase in first time GetCheckedOnline testers, percent positivity, and those reporting symptoms or being a contact to an STBBI during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest the program has filled a gap in STBBI testing services, and remains a critical service for accessing sexual healthcare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信