Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim
{"title":"应用h型钢异体隔离器与环形异体隔离器进行前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合的临床结果及有限元分析","authors":"Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Method Results of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using H-Beam Shaped Allospacer: A Comparison with Rim-Shaped Allospacer\",\"authors\":\"Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nerve\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Method Results of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using H-Beam Shaped Allospacer: A Comparison with Rim-Shaped Allospacer
Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.