应用h型钢异体隔离器与环形异体隔离器进行前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合的临床结果及有限元分析

Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim
{"title":"应用h型钢异体隔离器与环形异体隔离器进行前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合的临床结果及有限元分析","authors":"Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Method Results of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using H-Beam Shaped Allospacer: A Comparison with Rim-Shaped Allospacer\",\"authors\":\"Kyoung Jae Park, Dae Hwan Kim, K. Park, J. Park, N. Yoo, K. Cho, Sang Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nerve\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2019.5.2.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通讯作者:Sang Hyun Kim亚洲大学医学院神经外科,164,世界杯,水原永通区16499,大韩民国电话:+82-31-219-5230传真:+82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com目的:本研究的主要目的是评价h型钢异体隔离器与环型异体隔离器在前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)中的放射学结果和有限元分析结果。方法:2011年3月至2014年2月,95例患者采用同种异体间隔器(h型钢和缘型)行ACDF。62例患者分为2组:A组(n=31)采用Hbeam形同种异体间隔器;B组(n=31)采用边缘形异体隔离器。我们回顾性地评估了临床结果,如颈部和手臂疼痛、影像学融合率和不良反应。在有限元研究中,我们比较了3种不同形状的同种异体隔板的性能;即h型钢、h型钢孔、h型钢环。我们使用(a)压缩的评价标准来测试三种不同类型的异位间隔物的应力分布的有效性;(b)剪切;(c)扭矩,在相同荷载下。结果:两组患者的颈部和手臂疼痛均减轻了63% ~ 73%。A组和B组1年后的融合率分别为100%和98%。B组骨折和移位并发症发生率分别为16%和3%。A组无不良反应。通过有限元分析,在(a)、(b)、(c)的情况下,我们发现h型钢异质隔板与缘型异质隔板相比,在压缩、剪切和扭转方面产生了有效的应力分布和多样化。结论:在ACDF应用同种异体隔离器时,h型钢异体隔离器比边缘异体隔离器具有更稳定的融合率和更低的并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Method Results of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using H-Beam Shaped Allospacer: A Comparison with Rim-Shaped Allospacer
Corresponding author: Sang Hyun Kim Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-31-219-5230 Fax: +82-31-219-5238 E-mail: kaliemd@naver.com Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologic outcomes and Finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using H-beam shaped allospacer, in comparison with rim-shaped allospacer. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent ACDF using allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Sixty-two patients were divided into 2 groups: Hbeam shaped allospacer in group A (n=31); rim shaped allospacer in group B (n=31). We retrospectively estimated clinical outcomes, such as, neck and arm pain, radiographic fusion rate and adverse effects. In the FEM study, we compared the performance of 3 different shaped allospacer; i.e., H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, rim-shaped. We tested the effectiveness of stress distribution from the 3 types of allospacer, using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression; (b) shear; and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain was reduced similarly by 63% to 73% in 2 groups. Fusion rates after 1 year in group A and B were 100% and 98% retrospectively. The complication rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%. Group A show no adverse effects. From the FEM study, in the cases of the (a), (b), (c), we found that H-beam shaped allospacer resulted in effectiveness stress distribution and diversification regarding compression, shear and torsion compared with rim shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF using allospacer, H-beam shaped allospacer shows more stable fusion rates with low incidence of complication compared with rim shaped allospacer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信