基于集成方法的矿山瓦斯安全综合评价分析

H. Liu, L. Li
{"title":"基于集成方法的矿山瓦斯安全综合评价分析","authors":"H. Liu, L. Li","doi":"10.1109/CISE.2009.5363588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are some weaknesses in the traditional safety evaluation methods, such as, slow reasoning, low accuracy and so on, so thinking of a variety of factors which affect gas safety, a gas safety evaluation index system is built, which focuses on the state of gas, mine ventilation, gas monitoring, safety management and kindling. Combining the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method with Gray Correlation method and BP neural network method, taking Hei longjiang Longmay Group as an example, a gas safety evaluation in its five mines was made. The results show that using different integrated comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the gas safety in the same mine, the results are different. It requires decision-makers to consider many factors and adopt more appropriate and scientific methods when making a comprehensive evaluation, which makes a right decision.","PeriodicalId":135441,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Evaluation Analysis of Mine Gas Safety Based on Integrated Method\",\"authors\":\"H. Liu, L. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISE.2009.5363588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are some weaknesses in the traditional safety evaluation methods, such as, slow reasoning, low accuracy and so on, so thinking of a variety of factors which affect gas safety, a gas safety evaluation index system is built, which focuses on the state of gas, mine ventilation, gas monitoring, safety management and kindling. Combining the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method with Gray Correlation method and BP neural network method, taking Hei longjiang Longmay Group as an example, a gas safety evaluation in its five mines was made. The results show that using different integrated comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the gas safety in the same mine, the results are different. It requires decision-makers to consider many factors and adopt more appropriate and scientific methods when making a comprehensive evaluation, which makes a right decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5363588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5363588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传统的安全评价方法存在推理速度慢、准确性低等弱点,因此考虑到影响瓦斯安全的多种因素,构建了以瓦斯状态、矿井通风、瓦斯监测、安全管理、引燃等为重点的瓦斯安全评价指标体系。将模糊综合评价法、灰色关联法和BP神经网络法相结合,以黑龙江龙煤集团公司为例,对其5个矿山进行了瓦斯安全评价。结果表明,采用不同的综合评价方法对同一矿山瓦斯安全性进行评价,结果存在差异。这就要求决策者在进行综合评价时,要考虑多方面因素,采用更合适、更科学的方法,从而做出正确的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Evaluation Analysis of Mine Gas Safety Based on Integrated Method
There are some weaknesses in the traditional safety evaluation methods, such as, slow reasoning, low accuracy and so on, so thinking of a variety of factors which affect gas safety, a gas safety evaluation index system is built, which focuses on the state of gas, mine ventilation, gas monitoring, safety management and kindling. Combining the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method with Gray Correlation method and BP neural network method, taking Hei longjiang Longmay Group as an example, a gas safety evaluation in its five mines was made. The results show that using different integrated comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the gas safety in the same mine, the results are different. It requires decision-makers to consider many factors and adopt more appropriate and scientific methods when making a comprehensive evaluation, which makes a right decision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信