收入不平等与选民投票率

T. Matsubayashi, Shiro Sakaiya
{"title":"收入不平等与选民投票率","authors":"T. Matsubayashi, Shiro Sakaiya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3126657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the importance of the topic in the era of growing income inequality around the world, it remains inconclusive whether higher income inequality in the society exaggerates or lessens income bias in turnout (i.e., high-income citizens are more likely to vote than low-income citizens). This study revisits this question and ultimately offers novel evidence about how and why income inequality changes the degree of income bias. Our analysis using large-scale cross-national survey data reveals that: (1) strong income bias in voter turnout exists in many parts of the world, (2) higher income inequality in the society tends to reduce income bias in turnout by demobilizing high-income citizens and mobilizing low-income citizens, and (3) this relationship arises partly because vote buying is more common in societies with higher income inequality, which mobilizes low-income citizens but decreases political efficacy among high-income citizens. Ultimately, this study suggests that growing income inequality does not exaggerate political inequality, but might challenge the legitimacy of democratic elections due to the higher prevalence of vote buying.","PeriodicalId":346888,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income Inequality and Voter Turnout\",\"authors\":\"T. Matsubayashi, Shiro Sakaiya\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3126657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the importance of the topic in the era of growing income inequality around the world, it remains inconclusive whether higher income inequality in the society exaggerates or lessens income bias in turnout (i.e., high-income citizens are more likely to vote than low-income citizens). This study revisits this question and ultimately offers novel evidence about how and why income inequality changes the degree of income bias. Our analysis using large-scale cross-national survey data reveals that: (1) strong income bias in voter turnout exists in many parts of the world, (2) higher income inequality in the society tends to reduce income bias in turnout by demobilizing high-income citizens and mobilizing low-income citizens, and (3) this relationship arises partly because vote buying is more common in societies with higher income inequality, which mobilizes low-income citizens but decreases political efficacy among high-income citizens. Ultimately, this study suggests that growing income inequality does not exaggerate political inequality, but might challenge the legitimacy of democratic elections due to the higher prevalence of vote buying.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3126657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3126657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

尽管在全球收入不平等日益加剧的时代,这一话题很重要,但社会收入不平等加剧是会夸大还是会减少投票率中的收入偏见(即高收入公民比低收入公民更有可能投票),目前尚无定论。这项研究重新审视了这个问题,并最终提供了关于收入不平等如何以及为什么会改变收入偏见程度的新证据。我们使用大规模跨国调查数据进行的分析表明:(2)社会收入不平等程度越高,越倾向于通过遣散高收入公民和动员低收入公民来降低投票率的收入偏见;(3)这种关系产生的部分原因是,在收入不平等程度越高的社会中,贿选行为更为普遍,它动员了低收入公民,但降低了高收入公民的政治效能。最后,这项研究表明,收入不平等的扩大并没有夸大政治不平等,但由于贿选的盛行,可能会挑战民主选举的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Income Inequality and Voter Turnout
Despite the importance of the topic in the era of growing income inequality around the world, it remains inconclusive whether higher income inequality in the society exaggerates or lessens income bias in turnout (i.e., high-income citizens are more likely to vote than low-income citizens). This study revisits this question and ultimately offers novel evidence about how and why income inequality changes the degree of income bias. Our analysis using large-scale cross-national survey data reveals that: (1) strong income bias in voter turnout exists in many parts of the world, (2) higher income inequality in the society tends to reduce income bias in turnout by demobilizing high-income citizens and mobilizing low-income citizens, and (3) this relationship arises partly because vote buying is more common in societies with higher income inequality, which mobilizes low-income citizens but decreases political efficacy among high-income citizens. Ultimately, this study suggests that growing income inequality does not exaggerate political inequality, but might challenge the legitimacy of democratic elections due to the higher prevalence of vote buying.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信