量子力学中的认识论与本体论关系论:相对主义还是实在主义?

C. Ronde, Raimundo Fernández Mouján
{"title":"量子力学中的认识论与本体论关系论:相对主义还是实在主义?","authors":"C. Ronde, Raimundo Fernández Mouján","doi":"10.1142/9789813276895_0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigate the history of relationalism and its present use in some interpretations of quantum mechanics. In the first part of this article we will provide a conceptual analysis of the relation between substantivalism, relationalism and relativism in the history of both physics and philosophy. In the second part, we will address some relational interpretations of quantum mechanics, namely, Bohr's relational approach, the modal interpretation by Kochen, the perspectival modal version by Bene and Dieks and the relational interpretation by Rovelli. We will argue that all these interpretations ground their understanding of relations in epistemological terms. By taking into account the analysis on the first part of our work, we intend to highlight the fact that there is a different possibility for understanding quantum mechanics in relational terms which has not been yet considered within the foundational literature. This possibility is to consider relations in (non-relativist) ontological terms. We will argue that such an understanding might be capable of providing a novel approach to the problem of representing what quantum mechanics is really talking about.","PeriodicalId":294790,"journal":{"name":"Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EPISTEMOLOGICAL VS. ONTOLOGICAL RELATIONALISM IN QUANTUM MECHANICS: RELATIVISM OR REALISM?\",\"authors\":\"C. Ronde, Raimundo Fernández Mouján\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789813276895_0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we investigate the history of relationalism and its present use in some interpretations of quantum mechanics. In the first part of this article we will provide a conceptual analysis of the relation between substantivalism, relationalism and relativism in the history of both physics and philosophy. In the second part, we will address some relational interpretations of quantum mechanics, namely, Bohr's relational approach, the modal interpretation by Kochen, the perspectival modal version by Bene and Dieks and the relational interpretation by Rovelli. We will argue that all these interpretations ground their understanding of relations in epistemological terms. By taking into account the analysis on the first part of our work, we intend to highlight the fact that there is a different possibility for understanding quantum mechanics in relational terms which has not been yet considered within the foundational literature. This possibility is to consider relations in (non-relativist) ontological terms. We will argue that such an understanding might be capable of providing a novel approach to the problem of representing what quantum mechanics is really talking about.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813276895_0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813276895_0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了关系论的历史及其在量子力学的一些解释中的应用。在本文的第一部分,我们将对物理学和哲学史上实体主义、关系主义和相对主义之间的关系进行概念分析。在第二部分中,我们将讨论量子力学的一些关系解释,即玻尔的关系方法,Kochen的模态解释,Bene和Dieks的透视模态版本以及Rovelli的关系解释。我们会说,所有这些解释都是以认识论的方式来理解关系的。考虑到对我们工作第一部分的分析,我们打算强调这样一个事实,即在关系术语中理解量子力学有一种不同的可能性,这种可能性在基础文献中尚未被考虑到。这种可能性是用(非相对主义的)本体论术语来考虑关系。我们将论证,这样的理解可能能够提供一种新颖的方法来表示量子力学真正讨论的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EPISTEMOLOGICAL VS. ONTOLOGICAL RELATIONALISM IN QUANTUM MECHANICS: RELATIVISM OR REALISM?
In this paper we investigate the history of relationalism and its present use in some interpretations of quantum mechanics. In the first part of this article we will provide a conceptual analysis of the relation between substantivalism, relationalism and relativism in the history of both physics and philosophy. In the second part, we will address some relational interpretations of quantum mechanics, namely, Bohr's relational approach, the modal interpretation by Kochen, the perspectival modal version by Bene and Dieks and the relational interpretation by Rovelli. We will argue that all these interpretations ground their understanding of relations in epistemological terms. By taking into account the analysis on the first part of our work, we intend to highlight the fact that there is a different possibility for understanding quantum mechanics in relational terms which has not been yet considered within the foundational literature. This possibility is to consider relations in (non-relativist) ontological terms. We will argue that such an understanding might be capable of providing a novel approach to the problem of representing what quantum mechanics is really talking about.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信