{"title":"“欧洲中心主义”是如何获得欧洲-北美人类历史理论的地位的,这种理论赋予希腊-罗马古典世界作为人类文明摇篮的特权,而在这一过程中,非洲作为公认的人类摇篮的现实却黯然失色?","authors":"Timothy Gerber-Mellish","doi":"10.13169/jglobfaul.6.1.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History may be defined as the authenticated record of man’s activities and achievements. It is not a complete record, for there are many gaps in our knowledge of the past. There is also present an element of uncertainty. The historian can record only, what, in his judgement, is the closest possible approximation of the truth.","PeriodicalId":167633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Faultlines","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How did ‘Eurocentrism’ assume the status of a Euro-North American theory of human history that privileges the Greek–Roman classical world as the cradle of human civilisation in the process overshadowing the reality of Africa as the certified cradle of humankind?\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Gerber-Mellish\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/jglobfaul.6.1.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"History may be defined as the authenticated record of man’s activities and achievements. It is not a complete record, for there are many gaps in our knowledge of the past. There is also present an element of uncertainty. The historian can record only, what, in his judgement, is the closest possible approximation of the truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Faultlines\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Faultlines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.6.1.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Faultlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.6.1.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How did ‘Eurocentrism’ assume the status of a Euro-North American theory of human history that privileges the Greek–Roman classical world as the cradle of human civilisation in the process overshadowing the reality of Africa as the certified cradle of humankind?
History may be defined as the authenticated record of man’s activities and achievements. It is not a complete record, for there are many gaps in our knowledge of the past. There is also present an element of uncertainty. The historian can record only, what, in his judgement, is the closest possible approximation of the truth.