变压器安装故障分析案例研究-第1部分

Sudipta Maiti
{"title":"变压器安装故障分析案例研究-第1部分","authors":"Sudipta Maiti","doi":"10.1109/CPRE48231.2021.9429727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The events in this case study took place within a year of commissioning of Station Transformer # 1 & 2 at a newly commissioned Generating Station of 2 * 500MW Units. The case study analyses the reason of mal-tripping of High Impedance REF Protection during out-zone faults due to wrong maximum through fault current assumptions in REF Stabilizing Resistance calculations. It teaches us to use the maximum of 1LG and 3LG fault current as the through fault current for calculation of RS.","PeriodicalId":405115,"journal":{"name":"2021 74th Conference for Protective Relay Engineers (CPRE)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Studies in Analyzing Transformer Installation Faults – Part 1\",\"authors\":\"Sudipta Maiti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CPRE48231.2021.9429727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The events in this case study took place within a year of commissioning of Station Transformer # 1 & 2 at a newly commissioned Generating Station of 2 * 500MW Units. The case study analyses the reason of mal-tripping of High Impedance REF Protection during out-zone faults due to wrong maximum through fault current assumptions in REF Stabilizing Resistance calculations. It teaches us to use the maximum of 1LG and 3LG fault current as the through fault current for calculation of RS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 74th Conference for Protective Relay Engineers (CPRE)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 74th Conference for Protective Relay Engineers (CPRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPRE48231.2021.9429727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 74th Conference for Protective Relay Engineers (CPRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPRE48231.2021.9429727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例研究中的事件发生在新投产的2 * 500MW机组的1号和2号站变压器调试后的一年内。案例分析了高阻抗励磁保护在区外故障时,通过励磁稳定电阻计算中的故障电流假设错误,导致励磁保护最大值错误跳闸的原因。它告诉我们用1LG和3LG故障电流的最大值作为通故障电流来计算RS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case Studies in Analyzing Transformer Installation Faults – Part 1
The events in this case study took place within a year of commissioning of Station Transformer # 1 & 2 at a newly commissioned Generating Station of 2 * 500MW Units. The case study analyses the reason of mal-tripping of High Impedance REF Protection during out-zone faults due to wrong maximum through fault current assumptions in REF Stabilizing Resistance calculations. It teaches us to use the maximum of 1LG and 3LG fault current as the through fault current for calculation of RS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信