定义复杂系统的比较安全中的“最薄弱环节”

W. Pieters
{"title":"定义复杂系统的比较安全中的“最薄弱环节”","authors":"W. Pieters","doi":"10.1109/CloudCom.2013.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud architectures are complex socio-technical systems of systems, consisting not only of technological components and their connections, but also of physical premises and employees. When analysing security of such systems and considering countermeasures, the notion of \"weakest link\" often appears. Humans are then typically said to be the \"weakest link\" when it comes to security, but no proof is provided for this statement. One reason for this is the fact that there are no unified metrics of security that would apply to physical, digital and social components of complex systems alike. How does one compare the security of a room against the security of a piece of data, and how does social engineering an employee compare to exploiting a server vulnerability? Are we really comparing apples and oranges here, or would it be possible to present a comparative metric that would apply across the different domains? This paper explores the possibility of such a metric for complex systems, and proposes one in terms of the risk induced by an entity in the system. This also provides a foundation for the notion of \"weakest link\", in terms of the entity (set of entities) with the highest induced risk.","PeriodicalId":198053,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining \\\"The Weakest Link\\\" Comparative Security in Complex Systems of Systems\",\"authors\":\"W. Pieters\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CloudCom.2013.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud architectures are complex socio-technical systems of systems, consisting not only of technological components and their connections, but also of physical premises and employees. When analysing security of such systems and considering countermeasures, the notion of \\\"weakest link\\\" often appears. Humans are then typically said to be the \\\"weakest link\\\" when it comes to security, but no proof is provided for this statement. One reason for this is the fact that there are no unified metrics of security that would apply to physical, digital and social components of complex systems alike. How does one compare the security of a room against the security of a piece of data, and how does social engineering an employee compare to exploiting a server vulnerability? Are we really comparing apples and oranges here, or would it be possible to present a comparative metric that would apply across the different domains? This paper explores the possibility of such a metric for complex systems, and proposes one in terms of the risk induced by an entity in the system. This also provides a foundation for the notion of \\\"weakest link\\\", in terms of the entity (set of entities) with the highest induced risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2013.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2013.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

云架构是复杂的社会技术系统,不仅包括技术组件及其连接,还包括物理场所和员工。在分析此类系统的安全性并考虑对策时,经常会出现“最薄弱环节”的概念。当涉及到安全问题时,人类通常被认为是“最薄弱的环节”,但没有证据证明这种说法。造成这种情况的一个原因是,没有统一的安全指标,适用于复杂系统的物理、数字和社会组件。如何将一个房间的安全性与一段数据的安全性进行比较,如何将员工的社会工程与利用服务器漏洞进行比较?我们真的是在比较苹果和橘子吗,还是有可能提出一个适用于不同领域的比较指标?本文探讨了复杂系统中这种度量的可能性,并提出了一种基于系统中实体所引起的风险的度量。这也为“最薄弱环节”的概念提供了基础,就具有最高诱发风险的实体(实体集)而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining "The Weakest Link" Comparative Security in Complex Systems of Systems
Cloud architectures are complex socio-technical systems of systems, consisting not only of technological components and their connections, but also of physical premises and employees. When analysing security of such systems and considering countermeasures, the notion of "weakest link" often appears. Humans are then typically said to be the "weakest link" when it comes to security, but no proof is provided for this statement. One reason for this is the fact that there are no unified metrics of security that would apply to physical, digital and social components of complex systems alike. How does one compare the security of a room against the security of a piece of data, and how does social engineering an employee compare to exploiting a server vulnerability? Are we really comparing apples and oranges here, or would it be possible to present a comparative metric that would apply across the different domains? This paper explores the possibility of such a metric for complex systems, and proposes one in terms of the risk induced by an entity in the system. This also provides a foundation for the notion of "weakest link", in terms of the entity (set of entities) with the highest induced risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信