{"title":"有给定零的最接近的多项式","authors":"N. Rezvani, Robert M Corless","doi":"10.1145/1113439.1113442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his 1999 SIGSAM BULLETIN paper [7], H. J. Stetter gave an explicit formula for finding the nearest polynomial with a given zero. This present paper revisits the issue, correcting a minor omission from Stetter's formula and explicitly extending the results to different polynomial bases.Experiments with our implementation demonstrate that the formula may not after all, fully solve the problem, and we discuss some outstanding issues: first, that the nearest polynomial with the given zero may be identically zero (which might be surprising), and, second, that the problem of finding the nearest polynomial of the same degree with a given zero may not, in fact, have a solution. A third variant of the problem, namely to find the nearest monic polynomial (given a monic polynomial initially) with a given zero, a problem that makes sense in some polynomial bases but not others, can also be solved with Stetter's formula, and this may be more satisfactory in some circumstances. This last can be generalized to the case where some coefficients are intrinsic and not to be changed, whereas others are empiric and may safely be changed. Of course, this minor generalization is implicit in [7]; This paper simply makes it explicit.","PeriodicalId":314801,"journal":{"name":"SIGSAM Bull.","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nearest polynomial with a given zero, revisited\",\"authors\":\"N. Rezvani, Robert M Corless\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1113439.1113442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his 1999 SIGSAM BULLETIN paper [7], H. J. Stetter gave an explicit formula for finding the nearest polynomial with a given zero. This present paper revisits the issue, correcting a minor omission from Stetter's formula and explicitly extending the results to different polynomial bases.Experiments with our implementation demonstrate that the formula may not after all, fully solve the problem, and we discuss some outstanding issues: first, that the nearest polynomial with the given zero may be identically zero (which might be surprising), and, second, that the problem of finding the nearest polynomial of the same degree with a given zero may not, in fact, have a solution. A third variant of the problem, namely to find the nearest monic polynomial (given a monic polynomial initially) with a given zero, a problem that makes sense in some polynomial bases but not others, can also be solved with Stetter's formula, and this may be more satisfactory in some circumstances. This last can be generalized to the case where some coefficients are intrinsic and not to be changed, whereas others are empiric and may safely be changed. Of course, this minor generalization is implicit in [7]; This paper simply makes it explicit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGSAM Bull.\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGSAM Bull.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1113439.1113442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGSAM Bull.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1113439.1113442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
摘要
H. J. Stetter在他1999年的SIGSAM BULLETIN论文[7]中给出了一个寻找给定零的最近多项式的显式公式。本文重新讨论了这个问题,修正了Stetter公式中的一个小遗漏,并明确地将结果推广到不同的多项式基。用我们的实现进行的实验表明,公式可能终究不能完全解决问题,并且我们讨论了一些突出的问题:首先,与给定零最近的多项式可能等于零(这可能令人惊讶),其次,找到与给定零最近的同次多项式的问题实际上可能没有解。该问题的第三种变体,即找到与给定零最接近的monic多项式(最初给定一个monic多项式),这个问题在某些多项式基中有意义,但在其他多项式基中没有意义,也可以用Stetter公式来解决,这在某些情况下可能更令人满意。最后一点可以推广到某些系数是固有的,不能改变,而其他系数是经验的,可以安全地改变的情况。当然,这个次要的概括在[7]中是隐含的;本文只是简单地把这一点加以说明。
The nearest polynomial with a given zero, revisited
In his 1999 SIGSAM BULLETIN paper [7], H. J. Stetter gave an explicit formula for finding the nearest polynomial with a given zero. This present paper revisits the issue, correcting a minor omission from Stetter's formula and explicitly extending the results to different polynomial bases.Experiments with our implementation demonstrate that the formula may not after all, fully solve the problem, and we discuss some outstanding issues: first, that the nearest polynomial with the given zero may be identically zero (which might be surprising), and, second, that the problem of finding the nearest polynomial of the same degree with a given zero may not, in fact, have a solution. A third variant of the problem, namely to find the nearest monic polynomial (given a monic polynomial initially) with a given zero, a problem that makes sense in some polynomial bases but not others, can also be solved with Stetter's formula, and this may be more satisfactory in some circumstances. This last can be generalized to the case where some coefficients are intrinsic and not to be changed, whereas others are empiric and may safely be changed. Of course, this minor generalization is implicit in [7]; This paper simply makes it explicit.