关于CDS市场的投机我们知道些什么?

CDS Markets Pub Date : 2013-03-02 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2148616
Lars Norden, Kristina Radoeva
{"title":"关于CDS市场的投机我们知道些什么?","authors":"Lars Norden, Kristina Radoeva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2148616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We measure speculation in the CDS market and investigate its determinants. The CDS volume on a firm that exceeds its outstanding debt (= naked CDS) indicates speculation since hedging can be ruled out. Using weekly CDS trading volume data for actively traded U.S. firms during 2008-2012, we provide evidence for substantial speculation in the CDS market. The median (mean) ratio of the firm-specific CDS volume to total debt is 1.8 (3.6) and the maximum is 65, with values above one being consistent with speculation. We further show that the extent and likelihood of speculation varies across industries, and it significantly increases in firm default risk and decreases with firm size and profitability.","PeriodicalId":338158,"journal":{"name":"CDS Markets","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Do We Know About Speculation in the CDS Market?\",\"authors\":\"Lars Norden, Kristina Radoeva\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2148616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We measure speculation in the CDS market and investigate its determinants. The CDS volume on a firm that exceeds its outstanding debt (= naked CDS) indicates speculation since hedging can be ruled out. Using weekly CDS trading volume data for actively traded U.S. firms during 2008-2012, we provide evidence for substantial speculation in the CDS market. The median (mean) ratio of the firm-specific CDS volume to total debt is 1.8 (3.6) and the maximum is 65, with values above one being consistent with speculation. We further show that the extent and likelihood of speculation varies across industries, and it significantly increases in firm default risk and decreases with firm size and profitability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CDS Markets\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CDS Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2148616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CDS Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2148616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我们衡量CDS市场的投机行为,并调查其决定因素。一家公司的CDS交易量超过其未偿债务(=裸CDS)表明存在投机行为,因为对冲可以排除。利用2008-2012年期间活跃交易的美国公司的每周CDS交易量数据,我们提供了CDS市场存在大量投机行为的证据。公司特定CDS交易量与总债务之比的中位数(平均值)为1.8(3.6),最大值为65,高于1的值与投机行为一致。我们进一步表明,投机的程度和可能性因行业而异,它显著增加企业违约风险,并随着企业规模和盈利能力而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Do We Know About Speculation in the CDS Market?
We measure speculation in the CDS market and investigate its determinants. The CDS volume on a firm that exceeds its outstanding debt (= naked CDS) indicates speculation since hedging can be ruled out. Using weekly CDS trading volume data for actively traded U.S. firms during 2008-2012, we provide evidence for substantial speculation in the CDS market. The median (mean) ratio of the firm-specific CDS volume to total debt is 1.8 (3.6) and the maximum is 65, with values above one being consistent with speculation. We further show that the extent and likelihood of speculation varies across industries, and it significantly increases in firm default risk and decreases with firm size and profitability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信