{"title":"在物联网社会,网络(再)保险保单的撰写非常困难","authors":"R. Pal, Taoan Lu, Peihan Liu, Xinlong Yin","doi":"10.1109/WSC52266.2021.9715524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last decade has witnessed steadily growing markets for cyber (re-)insurance products to mitigate residual cyber-risk. In this introductory effort, we prove that underwriting simple cyber re-insurance policies can be worst case computationally hard, i.e., NP-Hard, especially for upcoming IoT societies. More specifically, let alone human underwriters, even a computer cannot compute an optimal cyber re-insurance policy in a reasonable amount of time in worst case scenarios. Here, optimality of a contract is judged based on the extent of information asymmetry induced negative externalities it mitigates between a re-insurance seller and a buyer. Our result does not challenge the existence of cyber re-insurance markets that we feel will be a necessity in the IoT age, but only rationalizes why their growth might be slow, and would subsequently need regulatory intervention. As a direct applicability of our methodology, we argue that optimal traditional cyber-insurance underwriting in IoT societies is also NP-Hard.","PeriodicalId":369368,"journal":{"name":"2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyber (Re-)Insurance Policy Writing Is Np-Hard In Iot Societies\",\"authors\":\"R. Pal, Taoan Lu, Peihan Liu, Xinlong Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WSC52266.2021.9715524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last decade has witnessed steadily growing markets for cyber (re-)insurance products to mitigate residual cyber-risk. In this introductory effort, we prove that underwriting simple cyber re-insurance policies can be worst case computationally hard, i.e., NP-Hard, especially for upcoming IoT societies. More specifically, let alone human underwriters, even a computer cannot compute an optimal cyber re-insurance policy in a reasonable amount of time in worst case scenarios. Here, optimality of a contract is judged based on the extent of information asymmetry induced negative externalities it mitigates between a re-insurance seller and a buyer. Our result does not challenge the existence of cyber re-insurance markets that we feel will be a necessity in the IoT age, but only rationalizes why their growth might be slow, and would subsequently need regulatory intervention. As a direct applicability of our methodology, we argue that optimal traditional cyber-insurance underwriting in IoT societies is also NP-Hard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC52266.2021.9715524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC52266.2021.9715524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cyber (Re-)Insurance Policy Writing Is Np-Hard In Iot Societies
The last decade has witnessed steadily growing markets for cyber (re-)insurance products to mitigate residual cyber-risk. In this introductory effort, we prove that underwriting simple cyber re-insurance policies can be worst case computationally hard, i.e., NP-Hard, especially for upcoming IoT societies. More specifically, let alone human underwriters, even a computer cannot compute an optimal cyber re-insurance policy in a reasonable amount of time in worst case scenarios. Here, optimality of a contract is judged based on the extent of information asymmetry induced negative externalities it mitigates between a re-insurance seller and a buyer. Our result does not challenge the existence of cyber re-insurance markets that we feel will be a necessity in the IoT age, but only rationalizes why their growth might be slow, and would subsequently need regulatory intervention. As a direct applicability of our methodology, we argue that optimal traditional cyber-insurance underwriting in IoT societies is also NP-Hard.