GUINLE和LOUVEIRA公园:两种不同的高跷块

Nathalia Cantergiani Fagundes de Oliveira
{"title":"GUINLE和LOUVEIRA公园:两种不同的高跷块","authors":"Nathalia Cantergiani Fagundes de Oliveira","doi":"10.22533/at.ed.90121231114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to explore two iconic buildings of Brazilian Modern Architecture, in which the presence of pilotis had established new permeability parameters at the ground floor level. The pilotis concept, preconized by Le Corbusier, and its application in Brazilian cities have given rise to projects that integrate themselves with local contexts in different ways, without losing the identity of this versatile element with a high potential for adaptability. The independent structure, the strategy of opening the ground floor and architectural composition’s inversion brought about by the use of pilotis are some points that could mark a typological transformation in the Brazilian architecture after the modern movement. The two works, to be analyzed in a comparative way, share common design strategies, which have their origin in the modern ideal city and in the Le Corbusier’s five points. However, its characteristics of implantation and spatial organization present variations of a typological model that constitute itself in an elementary lesson for the city and contemporary architecture.","PeriodicalId":184762,"journal":{"name":"Arquitetura e urbanismo: Sensibilidade plástica, noção do espaço, imaginação e memória visual","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PARQUE GUINLE E LOUVEIRA: DUAS VARIAÇÕES DO BLOCO SOBRE PILOTIS\",\"authors\":\"Nathalia Cantergiani Fagundes de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.22533/at.ed.90121231114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper intends to explore two iconic buildings of Brazilian Modern Architecture, in which the presence of pilotis had established new permeability parameters at the ground floor level. The pilotis concept, preconized by Le Corbusier, and its application in Brazilian cities have given rise to projects that integrate themselves with local contexts in different ways, without losing the identity of this versatile element with a high potential for adaptability. The independent structure, the strategy of opening the ground floor and architectural composition’s inversion brought about by the use of pilotis are some points that could mark a typological transformation in the Brazilian architecture after the modern movement. The two works, to be analyzed in a comparative way, share common design strategies, which have their origin in the modern ideal city and in the Le Corbusier’s five points. However, its characteristics of implantation and spatial organization present variations of a typological model that constitute itself in an elementary lesson for the city and contemporary architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquitetura e urbanismo: Sensibilidade plástica, noção do espaço, imaginação e memória visual\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquitetura e urbanismo: Sensibilidade plástica, noção do espaço, imaginação e memória visual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.90121231114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquitetura e urbanismo: Sensibilidade plástica, noção do espaço, imaginação e memória visual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.90121231114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探索两座巴西现代建筑的标志性建筑,其中pilot的存在在底层建立了新的渗透性参数。由勒·柯布西耶(Le Corbusier)提出的试点概念及其在巴西城市中的应用,使项目以不同的方式与当地环境相结合,同时又不失这种具有高适应性潜力的多功能元素的特性。独立的结构、一楼开放的策略和使用导窗带来的建筑构图的倒置,是现代运动后巴西建筑类型学转变的标志。这两件作品在对比分析中有着共同的设计策略,它们都源于现代理想城市和柯布西耶的五点。然而,它的植入和空间组织特征呈现出一种类型模型的变化,这种类型模型构成了城市和当代建筑的基础课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PARQUE GUINLE E LOUVEIRA: DUAS VARIAÇÕES DO BLOCO SOBRE PILOTIS
This paper intends to explore two iconic buildings of Brazilian Modern Architecture, in which the presence of pilotis had established new permeability parameters at the ground floor level. The pilotis concept, preconized by Le Corbusier, and its application in Brazilian cities have given rise to projects that integrate themselves with local contexts in different ways, without losing the identity of this versatile element with a high potential for adaptability. The independent structure, the strategy of opening the ground floor and architectural composition’s inversion brought about by the use of pilotis are some points that could mark a typological transformation in the Brazilian architecture after the modern movement. The two works, to be analyzed in a comparative way, share common design strategies, which have their origin in the modern ideal city and in the Le Corbusier’s five points. However, its characteristics of implantation and spatial organization present variations of a typological model that constitute itself in an elementary lesson for the city and contemporary architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信