文件系统评估跟踪重放方法的准确性研究

T. Pereira, Lívia M. R. Sampaio, F. Brasileiro
{"title":"文件系统评估跟踪重放方法的准确性研究","authors":"T. Pereira, Lívia M. R. Sampaio, F. Brasileiro","doi":"10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current trace replay methods for file system evaluation fail to represent traced workloads accurately. When using a misrepresented workload one may take wrong conclusions about the system evaluation. For example, a system designer can miss performance problems if the replay of a trace produces an under loaded representation of the real workload. Even worse, one can take wrong design decisions, leading to optimization of untypical workloads. In this study, we captured and replayed traces from standard file systems using methods proposed in the literature, to exemplify the inaccuracy of state-of-art trace replay methods. We also exposed a shortcoming of current methodologies, in a replay of a general purpose workload trace, we observed a difference of up to 100% on request response time, caused by the choice of trace replay method.","PeriodicalId":385538,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Accuracy of Trace Replay Methods for File System Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"T. Pereira, Lívia M. R. Sampaio, F. Brasileiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current trace replay methods for file system evaluation fail to represent traced workloads accurately. When using a misrepresented workload one may take wrong conclusions about the system evaluation. For example, a system designer can miss performance problems if the replay of a trace produces an under loaded representation of the real workload. Even worse, one can take wrong design decisions, leading to optimization of untypical workloads. In this study, we captured and replayed traces from standard file systems using methods proposed in the literature, to exemplify the inaccuracy of state-of-art trace replay methods. We also exposed a shortcoming of current methodologies, in a replay of a general purpose workload trace, we observed a difference of up to 100% on request response time, caused by the choice of trace replay method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当前用于文件系统评估的跟踪重播方法无法准确地表示跟踪的工作负载。当使用错误表示的工作负载时,可能会对系统评估得出错误的结论。例如,如果跟踪的重播产生实际工作负载的负载不足表示,系统设计人员可能会忽略性能问题。更糟糕的是,人们可能会做出错误的设计决策,导致非典型工作负载的优化。在本研究中,我们使用文献中提出的方法从标准文件系统捕获和重播跟踪,以举例说明最先进的跟踪重播方法的不准确性。我们还暴露了当前方法的一个缺点,在重播通用工作负载跟踪时,我们观察到在请求响应时间上的差异高达100%,这是由于选择了跟踪重播方法造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Accuracy of Trace Replay Methods for File System Evaluation
Current trace replay methods for file system evaluation fail to represent traced workloads accurately. When using a misrepresented workload one may take wrong conclusions about the system evaluation. For example, a system designer can miss performance problems if the replay of a trace produces an under loaded representation of the real workload. Even worse, one can take wrong design decisions, leading to optimization of untypical workloads. In this study, we captured and replayed traces from standard file systems using methods proposed in the literature, to exemplify the inaccuracy of state-of-art trace replay methods. We also exposed a shortcoming of current methodologies, in a replay of a general purpose workload trace, we observed a difference of up to 100% on request response time, caused by the choice of trace replay method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信