利奥波德·加利奥蒂关于市政学校的报告(1870年)和托斯卡纳现代主义的矛盾

S. Cingari
{"title":"利奥波德·加利奥蒂关于市政学校的报告(1870年)和托斯卡纳现代主义的矛盾","authors":"S. Cingari","doi":"10.6092/issn.2498-9886/6738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay deals with Leopoldo Galeotti’s 1870 report about Florentine public schools, a report which so far has not been sufficiently studied by historians. It is useful to study the ambivalence of Tuscan post-Union moderates, divided between a discourse on the acculturation of the lower classes and a different anti-democratic practice. The essay also argues that in the second part of nineteenth-century liberalism was inspired by a view that differs from that of contemporary neoliberalism. While the paradigm of liberalism was based on “exchange”, the neo-liberal one builds upon competition.","PeriodicalId":184432,"journal":{"name":"Annali Sismondi","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Relazione di Leopoldo Galeotti sulle scuole del Comune (1870) e le ambivalenze del moderatismo toscano\",\"authors\":\"S. Cingari\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/issn.2498-9886/6738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay deals with Leopoldo Galeotti’s 1870 report about Florentine public schools, a report which so far has not been sufficiently studied by historians. It is useful to study the ambivalence of Tuscan post-Union moderates, divided between a discourse on the acculturation of the lower classes and a different anti-democratic practice. The essay also argues that in the second part of nineteenth-century liberalism was inspired by a view that differs from that of contemporary neoliberalism. While the paradigm of liberalism was based on “exchange”, the neo-liberal one builds upon competition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali Sismondi\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali Sismondi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2498-9886/6738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali Sismondi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2498-9886/6738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章涉及莱奥波尔多·加莱奥蒂(Leopoldo Galeotti) 1870年关于佛罗伦萨公立学校的报告,迄今为止,历史学家还没有对该报告进行充分的研究。研究托斯卡纳后联盟温和派的矛盾心理是有用的,他们分为下层阶级文化适应的论述和不同的反民主实践。本文还认为,在19世纪的第二部分,自由主义受到一种不同于当代新自由主义的观点的启发。自由主义的范式建立在“交换”的基础上,而新自由主义则建立在竞争的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La Relazione di Leopoldo Galeotti sulle scuole del Comune (1870) e le ambivalenze del moderatismo toscano
The essay deals with Leopoldo Galeotti’s 1870 report about Florentine public schools, a report which so far has not been sufficiently studied by historians. It is useful to study the ambivalence of Tuscan post-Union moderates, divided between a discourse on the acculturation of the lower classes and a different anti-democratic practice. The essay also argues that in the second part of nineteenth-century liberalism was inspired by a view that differs from that of contemporary neoliberalism. While the paradigm of liberalism was based on “exchange”, the neo-liberal one builds upon competition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信