与创新领导相比,什么理论可以解释企业家精神?

Andrea Zelienková
{"title":"与创新领导相比,什么理论可以解释企业家精神?","authors":"Andrea Zelienková","doi":"10.25142/aak.2022.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Business creation theories were rarely explored with stages that precede the final intention to start a business. Therefore, this paper aimed to examine what factors impact the final decision to start a business and what factors just lead to a more favourable perception of a business opportunity. Several theories recognized by literature like the theory of planned behaviour, traits, cognitive biases, and risk attitudes were tested. Moreover, the explanatory power of these theories to entrepreneurship compared to innovative (leadership) practices was tested. When examining multiple regression models, it was shown that above mentioned theories predict entrepreneurship as well as innovative practices. Model that involved business creation theories predicting opportunity evaluation was significant. Among predictors of opportunity evaluation, it was shown that unrealistic optimism, risk attitudes as well as traits or theory of planned behaviour did contribute to the prediction of opportunity evaluation. When testing multiple regression model of the final decision to invest in the business opportunity, it was shown that it solely depends on risk perception. No theories other than risk perception predicted the decision to start a business. From the multiple regression model explaining innovative practices, it was shown that traits and positive illusions significantly added to the prediction of innovative practices. Overall findings contribute to the debate of entrepreneurship predictors and suggest that the final decision to start a business is rather determined by risk perception. The results suggest that risk perception is the factor, which may distinguish entrepreneurs from others that incline to entrepreneurship but may not found their own business and rather be innovative on the job. This study emphasizes that cognitive phenomena are applicable in explaining entrepreneurial intention and those qualities may be addressed by entrepreneurial education.","PeriodicalId":315784,"journal":{"name":"Acta academica karviniensia","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHAT THEORIES EXPLAIN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS COMPARED TO INNOVATIVE LEADERSHIP?\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Zelienková\",\"doi\":\"10.25142/aak.2022.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Business creation theories were rarely explored with stages that precede the final intention to start a business. Therefore, this paper aimed to examine what factors impact the final decision to start a business and what factors just lead to a more favourable perception of a business opportunity. Several theories recognized by literature like the theory of planned behaviour, traits, cognitive biases, and risk attitudes were tested. Moreover, the explanatory power of these theories to entrepreneurship compared to innovative (leadership) practices was tested. When examining multiple regression models, it was shown that above mentioned theories predict entrepreneurship as well as innovative practices. Model that involved business creation theories predicting opportunity evaluation was significant. Among predictors of opportunity evaluation, it was shown that unrealistic optimism, risk attitudes as well as traits or theory of planned behaviour did contribute to the prediction of opportunity evaluation. When testing multiple regression model of the final decision to invest in the business opportunity, it was shown that it solely depends on risk perception. No theories other than risk perception predicted the decision to start a business. From the multiple regression model explaining innovative practices, it was shown that traits and positive illusions significantly added to the prediction of innovative practices. Overall findings contribute to the debate of entrepreneurship predictors and suggest that the final decision to start a business is rather determined by risk perception. The results suggest that risk perception is the factor, which may distinguish entrepreneurs from others that incline to entrepreneurship but may not found their own business and rather be innovative on the job. This study emphasizes that cognitive phenomena are applicable in explaining entrepreneurial intention and those qualities may be addressed by entrepreneurial education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta academica karviniensia\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta academica karviniensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2022.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta academica karviniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2022.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创业理论很少在最终创业意图之前的阶段进行探索。因此,本文旨在研究哪些因素会影响创业的最终决定,以及哪些因素会导致对商机的更有利的看法。一些被文献认可的理论,如计划行为理论、特征、认知偏见和风险态度都被测试了。此外,与创新(领导)实践相比,这些理论对企业家精神的解释力得到了检验。通过对多元回归模型的检验,我们发现上述理论既能预测企业家精神,也能预测创新实践。运用创业理论预测机会评价的模型具有显著性。在机会评价的预测因子中,不现实乐观主义、风险态度和计划行为特征或理论对机会评价的预测有贡献。在对商业机会最终投资决策的多元回归模型进行检验时,结果表明,投资机会的最终投资决策仅取决于风险感知。除了风险感知之外,没有任何理论能预测创业的决定。从解释创新实践的多元回归模型来看,特质和积极幻想显著地增加了创新实践的预测。总体研究结果有助于对创业预测因素的争论,并表明创业的最终决定在很大程度上取决于风险感知。结果表明,风险感知是一个因素,它可以区分企业家和其他人倾向于创业,但可能没有找到自己的企业,而是在工作中创新。本研究强调认知现象适用于解释创业意向,这些特质可以通过创业教育加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WHAT THEORIES EXPLAIN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS COMPARED TO INNOVATIVE LEADERSHIP?
: Business creation theories were rarely explored with stages that precede the final intention to start a business. Therefore, this paper aimed to examine what factors impact the final decision to start a business and what factors just lead to a more favourable perception of a business opportunity. Several theories recognized by literature like the theory of planned behaviour, traits, cognitive biases, and risk attitudes were tested. Moreover, the explanatory power of these theories to entrepreneurship compared to innovative (leadership) practices was tested. When examining multiple regression models, it was shown that above mentioned theories predict entrepreneurship as well as innovative practices. Model that involved business creation theories predicting opportunity evaluation was significant. Among predictors of opportunity evaluation, it was shown that unrealistic optimism, risk attitudes as well as traits or theory of planned behaviour did contribute to the prediction of opportunity evaluation. When testing multiple regression model of the final decision to invest in the business opportunity, it was shown that it solely depends on risk perception. No theories other than risk perception predicted the decision to start a business. From the multiple regression model explaining innovative practices, it was shown that traits and positive illusions significantly added to the prediction of innovative practices. Overall findings contribute to the debate of entrepreneurship predictors and suggest that the final decision to start a business is rather determined by risk perception. The results suggest that risk perception is the factor, which may distinguish entrepreneurs from others that incline to entrepreneurship but may not found their own business and rather be innovative on the job. This study emphasizes that cognitive phenomena are applicable in explaining entrepreneurial intention and those qualities may be addressed by entrepreneurial education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信