项目成功实施的EPC策略

Mohamed Saeed AlMarar
{"title":"项目成功实施的EPC策略","authors":"Mohamed Saeed AlMarar","doi":"10.2118/198578-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The essential requirements for sanctioning Energy Sector projects have always been conceptual planning, Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and feasibility studies. Traditional EPC projects start with a planning phase, a design phase, a construction phase, a testing phase, and a turnover to the user phase followed by project closeout. Such projects are usually delivered through water fall management approach. Large EPC projects have more elaborate models with multiple stage gates and bid phases, but the commonality is the sequential nature, with user input happening primarily in the planning and or design phase. During construction phase again there is a sequential work plan with defined project schedule defining activities with regards to trade or geographic areas. Large construction projects are usually implemented through multiple sub-contractors under a general contractor, with a separate designer and a separate owner, and in some cases separate end users (tenants), with complex contracting methodology (ies) in place.\n As the era of \"easy hydrocarbons\" is approaching its end, mega-projects are becoming a norm in petroleum sector despite high CAPEX and having long lead times for reaching commercial operations. This is so because unconventional oil and gas like shale gas, Oil sands, FLNG, Ultra-deep water reservoirs require implemetation of state-of-the-art technologies and resource in lesser known project site conditions. FID for such project has traditionally been based on conceptual planning, Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and feasibility studies. These preliminary steps also help in defining a rigid process (Stage Gate Process \"SGP\") to follow during subsequent project progress related to EPC activities. SGP outlines activities to be completed in every stage of the project and progress into subsequent stage is authorized only with the approval of a committee / individual called \"Gatekeeper\".\n This study discusses application of SGP, having shared Gatekeeper from project stakeholders, together with Agile project management methods, SCRUM to be specific, for developing successful strategies for project EPC phase.\n As oil and gas industry is moving to megaprojects with innovative reserves recovery ideas, the sector is experiencing increased utility of Agile project-management methods. The entire innovation process has great potential in reducing project development time frame and increasing the success rate of Greenfield or Brownfield projects. This study outlines how Agile method, such as Scrum, can be used as a structured innovative methodology with milestones and decision points (similar to Stage-Gate), and benefits for project stakeholders. This study is carried out as follows: One (01) Green Field project is selected for investigation related to successful EPC management through possible use of Scrum (Agile Methodology)One (01) IT Project is selected for investigations related to successful implementation of Agile management during planning, development and delivery phase.Responsibilities of Project Owner as well as Project Director (Single Point Accountable individual) will be identified for successful implementation of Agile methodology.The study will investigate the availability of know-how and actual utilization of combination of SGP and Srum (Agile methodology) by Project Director / Owner during project execution.The study will identify and quantify the risks involved and benefits achieved in using combination of SGP and Scrum project management strategy.\n This study indicates that Project Owner as well as Project Director are responsible to identify which component of the EPC project is to be handled through waterfall management and which component is to be managed through Agile.\n The paper provided two case studies of the use of agile tools and methodologies for IT related projects (which are true candidate for Agile) and EPC project which is different from software or information technology. The very beneficial results and outcomes from the case studies provided proven examples of the success of the application.\n It is recommended that not all of the principles of agile fit into every EPC project management requirement and need to be evaluated for use for each project and additionally management should make investments in non-core training for their personnel.\n Mega projects in oil and gas sector are prone to change in requirements during EPC stage. As such Agile project-management method i.e. SCRUM can be used in the innovation process and has a great potential to reduce development time and increase the success rate of new projects. The article briefly outlines how an Agile method, such as Scrum, can be used within a structured innovation process with milestones and decision points, such as Stage-Gate. For mega projects in oil and gas sector a combination of waterfall and scrum methods can be used for managing components of the project.","PeriodicalId":182237,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, October 23, 2019","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EPC Strategies for a Successful Project Execution\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Saeed AlMarar\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198578-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The essential requirements for sanctioning Energy Sector projects have always been conceptual planning, Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and feasibility studies. Traditional EPC projects start with a planning phase, a design phase, a construction phase, a testing phase, and a turnover to the user phase followed by project closeout. Such projects are usually delivered through water fall management approach. Large EPC projects have more elaborate models with multiple stage gates and bid phases, but the commonality is the sequential nature, with user input happening primarily in the planning and or design phase. During construction phase again there is a sequential work plan with defined project schedule defining activities with regards to trade or geographic areas. Large construction projects are usually implemented through multiple sub-contractors under a general contractor, with a separate designer and a separate owner, and in some cases separate end users (tenants), with complex contracting methodology (ies) in place.\\n As the era of \\\"easy hydrocarbons\\\" is approaching its end, mega-projects are becoming a norm in petroleum sector despite high CAPEX and having long lead times for reaching commercial operations. This is so because unconventional oil and gas like shale gas, Oil sands, FLNG, Ultra-deep water reservoirs require implemetation of state-of-the-art technologies and resource in lesser known project site conditions. FID for such project has traditionally been based on conceptual planning, Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and feasibility studies. These preliminary steps also help in defining a rigid process (Stage Gate Process \\\"SGP\\\") to follow during subsequent project progress related to EPC activities. SGP outlines activities to be completed in every stage of the project and progress into subsequent stage is authorized only with the approval of a committee / individual called \\\"Gatekeeper\\\".\\n This study discusses application of SGP, having shared Gatekeeper from project stakeholders, together with Agile project management methods, SCRUM to be specific, for developing successful strategies for project EPC phase.\\n As oil and gas industry is moving to megaprojects with innovative reserves recovery ideas, the sector is experiencing increased utility of Agile project-management methods. The entire innovation process has great potential in reducing project development time frame and increasing the success rate of Greenfield or Brownfield projects. This study outlines how Agile method, such as Scrum, can be used as a structured innovative methodology with milestones and decision points (similar to Stage-Gate), and benefits for project stakeholders. This study is carried out as follows: One (01) Green Field project is selected for investigation related to successful EPC management through possible use of Scrum (Agile Methodology)One (01) IT Project is selected for investigations related to successful implementation of Agile management during planning, development and delivery phase.Responsibilities of Project Owner as well as Project Director (Single Point Accountable individual) will be identified for successful implementation of Agile methodology.The study will investigate the availability of know-how and actual utilization of combination of SGP and Srum (Agile methodology) by Project Director / Owner during project execution.The study will identify and quantify the risks involved and benefits achieved in using combination of SGP and Scrum project management strategy.\\n This study indicates that Project Owner as well as Project Director are responsible to identify which component of the EPC project is to be handled through waterfall management and which component is to be managed through Agile.\\n The paper provided two case studies of the use of agile tools and methodologies for IT related projects (which are true candidate for Agile) and EPC project which is different from software or information technology. The very beneficial results and outcomes from the case studies provided proven examples of the success of the application.\\n It is recommended that not all of the principles of agile fit into every EPC project management requirement and need to be evaluated for use for each project and additionally management should make investments in non-core training for their personnel.\\n Mega projects in oil and gas sector are prone to change in requirements during EPC stage. As such Agile project-management method i.e. SCRUM can be used in the innovation process and has a great potential to reduce development time and increase the success rate of new projects. The article briefly outlines how an Agile method, such as Scrum, can be used within a structured innovation process with milestones and decision points, such as Stage-Gate. For mega projects in oil and gas sector a combination of waterfall and scrum methods can be used for managing components of the project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":182237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, October 23, 2019\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, October 23, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198578-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, October 23, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198578-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批准能源部门项目的基本要求一直是概念规划、前端工程设计(FEED)和可行性研究。传统的EPC项目从规划阶段、设计阶段、施工阶段、测试阶段开始,然后是项目结束后的用户阶段。此类项目通常通过瀑布管理方法交付。大型EPC项目有更复杂的模型,有多个阶段的闸门和投标阶段,但其共性是顺序的,用户输入主要发生在规划和/或设计阶段。在施工阶段,有一个连续的工作计划,其中定义了与贸易或地理区域相关的项目时间表。大型建筑项目通常由总承包商下的多个分包商实施,有单独的设计师和单独的业主,在某些情况下有单独的最终用户(租户),采用复杂的承包方法。随着“易开采碳氢化合物”时代的结束,大型项目正在成为石油行业的一种常态,尽管资本支出高,进入商业运营需要很长时间。这是因为页岩气、油砂、FLNG、超深水储层等非常规油气需要在鲜为人知的项目现场条件下实施最先进的技术和资源。传统上,此类项目的FID是基于概念规划、前端工程设计(FEED)和可行性研究。这些初步步骤还有助于定义一个严格的过程(阶段门过程“SGP”),以便在与EPC活动相关的后续项目进展中遵循。SGP概述了在项目的每个阶段要完成的活动,只有在被称为“看门人”的委员会/个人批准的情况下,才能授权进入下一阶段。本研究讨论了SGP的应用,从项目利益相关者那里共享了Gatekeeper,以及敏捷项目管理方法,具体来说是SCRUM,用于开发项目EPC阶段的成功策略。随着油气行业采用创新的储量开采理念转向大型项目,该行业越来越多地采用敏捷项目管理方法。整个创新过程在缩短项目开发时间,提高绿地或棕地项目的成功率方面具有很大的潜力。本研究概述了如何将敏捷方法(如Scrum)作为具有里程碑和决策点(类似于Stage-Gate)的结构化创新方法,并为项目干系人带来好处。本研究进行如下:选择一个(01)绿地项目进行调查,通过可能使用Scrum(敏捷方法论)来成功管理EPC。选择一个(01)IT项目进行调查,在计划、开发和交付阶段成功实施敏捷管理。项目负责人和项目总监(单点责任人)的职责将被确定为成功实施敏捷方法。该研究将调查项目主管/业主在项目执行过程中对专业知识的可用性以及对SGP和Srum(敏捷方法)组合的实际利用。该研究将识别和量化使用SGP和Scrum项目管理策略组合所涉及的风险和获得的收益。这项研究表明,项目负责人和项目总监有责任确定EPC项目的哪个组件要通过瀑布管理来处理,哪个组件要通过敏捷管理。本文提供了两个使用敏捷工具和方法的案例研究,分别用于与IT相关的项目(这是敏捷的真正候选项目)和不同于软件或信息技术的EPC项目。从案例研究中获得的非常有益的结果和结果为应用程序的成功提供了证明。建议并非所有敏捷原则都适合每个EPC项目管理需求,需要对每个项目的使用进行评估,此外,管理层应该对其人员的非核心培训进行投资。石油和天然气行业的大型项目在EPC阶段容易发生需求变化。因此,敏捷项目管理方法(即SCRUM)可以用于创新过程,并且在减少开发时间和提高新项目成功率方面具有很大的潜力。本文简要概述了敏捷方法(如Scrum)如何在具有里程碑和决策点(如Stage-Gate)的结构化创新过程中使用。对于石油和天然气行业的大型项目,可以使用瀑布和scrum方法的组合来管理项目的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EPC Strategies for a Successful Project Execution
The essential requirements for sanctioning Energy Sector projects have always been conceptual planning, Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and feasibility studies. Traditional EPC projects start with a planning phase, a design phase, a construction phase, a testing phase, and a turnover to the user phase followed by project closeout. Such projects are usually delivered through water fall management approach. Large EPC projects have more elaborate models with multiple stage gates and bid phases, but the commonality is the sequential nature, with user input happening primarily in the planning and or design phase. During construction phase again there is a sequential work plan with defined project schedule defining activities with regards to trade or geographic areas. Large construction projects are usually implemented through multiple sub-contractors under a general contractor, with a separate designer and a separate owner, and in some cases separate end users (tenants), with complex contracting methodology (ies) in place. As the era of "easy hydrocarbons" is approaching its end, mega-projects are becoming a norm in petroleum sector despite high CAPEX and having long lead times for reaching commercial operations. This is so because unconventional oil and gas like shale gas, Oil sands, FLNG, Ultra-deep water reservoirs require implemetation of state-of-the-art technologies and resource in lesser known project site conditions. FID for such project has traditionally been based on conceptual planning, Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) and feasibility studies. These preliminary steps also help in defining a rigid process (Stage Gate Process "SGP") to follow during subsequent project progress related to EPC activities. SGP outlines activities to be completed in every stage of the project and progress into subsequent stage is authorized only with the approval of a committee / individual called "Gatekeeper". This study discusses application of SGP, having shared Gatekeeper from project stakeholders, together with Agile project management methods, SCRUM to be specific, for developing successful strategies for project EPC phase. As oil and gas industry is moving to megaprojects with innovative reserves recovery ideas, the sector is experiencing increased utility of Agile project-management methods. The entire innovation process has great potential in reducing project development time frame and increasing the success rate of Greenfield or Brownfield projects. This study outlines how Agile method, such as Scrum, can be used as a structured innovative methodology with milestones and decision points (similar to Stage-Gate), and benefits for project stakeholders. This study is carried out as follows: One (01) Green Field project is selected for investigation related to successful EPC management through possible use of Scrum (Agile Methodology)One (01) IT Project is selected for investigations related to successful implementation of Agile management during planning, development and delivery phase.Responsibilities of Project Owner as well as Project Director (Single Point Accountable individual) will be identified for successful implementation of Agile methodology.The study will investigate the availability of know-how and actual utilization of combination of SGP and Srum (Agile methodology) by Project Director / Owner during project execution.The study will identify and quantify the risks involved and benefits achieved in using combination of SGP and Scrum project management strategy. This study indicates that Project Owner as well as Project Director are responsible to identify which component of the EPC project is to be handled through waterfall management and which component is to be managed through Agile. The paper provided two case studies of the use of agile tools and methodologies for IT related projects (which are true candidate for Agile) and EPC project which is different from software or information technology. The very beneficial results and outcomes from the case studies provided proven examples of the success of the application. It is recommended that not all of the principles of agile fit into every EPC project management requirement and need to be evaluated for use for each project and additionally management should make investments in non-core training for their personnel. Mega projects in oil and gas sector are prone to change in requirements during EPC stage. As such Agile project-management method i.e. SCRUM can be used in the innovation process and has a great potential to reduce development time and increase the success rate of new projects. The article briefly outlines how an Agile method, such as Scrum, can be used within a structured innovation process with milestones and decision points, such as Stage-Gate. For mega projects in oil and gas sector a combination of waterfall and scrum methods can be used for managing components of the project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信