失望、悲观与股票风险溢价

T. Chauveau, N. Nalpas
{"title":"失望、悲观与股票风险溢价","authors":"T. Chauveau, N. Nalpas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.302930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the implications of the introduction of disappointment averse agents on the financial markets. The underlying intuition is that agents take account for the potential disappointment of their decisions, in particular when they invest on the stock market. After having defined the concepts of disappointment aversion, we show that in our framework a disappointment averse agent is pessimistic. We then explore the consequences of disappointment aversion and pessimism on the CAPM and the C-CAPM. We finally study a Lucas asset pricing model that is standard, except that the representative agent is supposed to be disappointment averse. Using a constant marginal utility function, we show that the model can account for both large equity risk premia and low risk-free rates. It may so be viewed as a solution to the equity premium puzzle","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disappointment, Pessimism and the Equity Risk Premia\",\"authors\":\"T. Chauveau, N. Nalpas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.302930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze the implications of the introduction of disappointment averse agents on the financial markets. The underlying intuition is that agents take account for the potential disappointment of their decisions, in particular when they invest on the stock market. After having defined the concepts of disappointment aversion, we show that in our framework a disappointment averse agent is pessimistic. We then explore the consequences of disappointment aversion and pessimism on the CAPM and the C-CAPM. We finally study a Lucas asset pricing model that is standard, except that the representative agent is supposed to be disappointment averse. Using a constant marginal utility function, we show that the model can account for both large equity risk premia and low risk-free rates. It may so be viewed as a solution to the equity premium puzzle\",\"PeriodicalId\":151935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们分析了引入失望厌恶代理人对金融市场的影响。潜在的直觉是,代理人考虑到他们的决定可能令人失望,特别是当他们投资股票市场时。在定义了失望厌恶的概念之后,我们证明了在我们的框架中,一个失望厌恶的主体是悲观的。然后探讨了失望厌恶和悲观情绪对CAPM和C-CAPM的影响。最后,我们研究了一个标准的卢卡斯资产定价模型,除了代表代理人应该是失望厌恶的。使用一个常数边际效用函数,我们表明该模型可以同时解释大的股票风险溢价和低的无风险利率。因此,这可能被视为股票溢价之谜的解决方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disappointment, Pessimism and the Equity Risk Premia
We analyze the implications of the introduction of disappointment averse agents on the financial markets. The underlying intuition is that agents take account for the potential disappointment of their decisions, in particular when they invest on the stock market. After having defined the concepts of disappointment aversion, we show that in our framework a disappointment averse agent is pessimistic. We then explore the consequences of disappointment aversion and pessimism on the CAPM and the C-CAPM. We finally study a Lucas asset pricing model that is standard, except that the representative agent is supposed to be disappointment averse. Using a constant marginal utility function, we show that the model can account for both large equity risk premia and low risk-free rates. It may so be viewed as a solution to the equity premium puzzle
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信