中东和北非

{"title":"中东和北非","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/23740973.2020.1761620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key trends Conflicts in the Middle East remain highly regionalised and internationalised; rivalries among external powers play out across the region. The US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) liberated the last ISIS-held territory in Syria. ISIS adapted by resorting to insurgency tactics, in both Syria and Iraq. Iraq’s post-ISIS stabilisation is tentative. By 2019, a large protest movement upended Iraqi politics, while US–Iran tensions also played out in the Iraqi arena. In Libya, a new, more brutal phase of civil war began, with more direct involvement of regional rivals. Egypt contended with regular attacks in the Sinai Peninsula although the insurgency began to lose its strength. Israeli dominance and unilateralism shaped the trajectory of the Israel–Palestine conflict. Strategic implications Syria is likely to remain an exporter of instability in the foreseeable future and to continue drawing external interference. Turkey’s intervention in Syria isolated the country from its regional interlocutors and NATO allies. Russia attempted to fill the diplomatic vacuum created by the sudden withdrawal of US forces from northern Syria. The influence of pro-Iranian militias, the weakness of the central government and US–Iran tensions put the stability of Iraq at risk. Many global powers see the conflict in Libya as an opportunity to expand their strategic influence in the Mediterranean. The Saudi-led coalition came under greater scrutiny in 2019, from the US and UK in particular. President Trump’s pro-Israeli policies alienated Palestinians and undermined the United States’ role as negotiator. Prospects While a comprehensive and inclusive political settlement in Syria remains elusive, a new insurgency is brewing in southern Syria. The resurgence of ISIS is already under way. A lull in hostilities in northern Syria is possible, but prospects for peace are non-existent in the short term. Turkish forces in Syrian areas are creating tensions with local communities and fuel low-intensity conflict. A return to large-scale territorial control by ISIS is unlikely, but without adequate counter-insurgency efforts, Iraq will struggle to eliminate remaining militants. The Saudi-led coalition’s declining appetite for war in Yemen suggests a potential peace settlement more expansive than the Stockholm Agreement envisaged. Increased fragmentation in Libya raises concerns over a possible partition. Proxy wars are unlikely to end soon.","PeriodicalId":126865,"journal":{"name":"Armed Conflict Survey","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4 Middle East and North Africa\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23740973.2020.1761620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Key trends Conflicts in the Middle East remain highly regionalised and internationalised; rivalries among external powers play out across the region. The US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) liberated the last ISIS-held territory in Syria. ISIS adapted by resorting to insurgency tactics, in both Syria and Iraq. Iraq’s post-ISIS stabilisation is tentative. By 2019, a large protest movement upended Iraqi politics, while US–Iran tensions also played out in the Iraqi arena. In Libya, a new, more brutal phase of civil war began, with more direct involvement of regional rivals. Egypt contended with regular attacks in the Sinai Peninsula although the insurgency began to lose its strength. Israeli dominance and unilateralism shaped the trajectory of the Israel–Palestine conflict. Strategic implications Syria is likely to remain an exporter of instability in the foreseeable future and to continue drawing external interference. Turkey’s intervention in Syria isolated the country from its regional interlocutors and NATO allies. Russia attempted to fill the diplomatic vacuum created by the sudden withdrawal of US forces from northern Syria. The influence of pro-Iranian militias, the weakness of the central government and US–Iran tensions put the stability of Iraq at risk. Many global powers see the conflict in Libya as an opportunity to expand their strategic influence in the Mediterranean. The Saudi-led coalition came under greater scrutiny in 2019, from the US and UK in particular. President Trump’s pro-Israeli policies alienated Palestinians and undermined the United States’ role as negotiator. Prospects While a comprehensive and inclusive political settlement in Syria remains elusive, a new insurgency is brewing in southern Syria. The resurgence of ISIS is already under way. A lull in hostilities in northern Syria is possible, but prospects for peace are non-existent in the short term. Turkish forces in Syrian areas are creating tensions with local communities and fuel low-intensity conflict. A return to large-scale territorial control by ISIS is unlikely, but without adequate counter-insurgency efforts, Iraq will struggle to eliminate remaining militants. The Saudi-led coalition’s declining appetite for war in Yemen suggests a potential peace settlement more expansive than the Stockholm Agreement envisaged. Increased fragmentation in Libya raises concerns over a possible partition. Proxy wars are unlikely to end soon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Armed Conflict Survey\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Armed Conflict Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23740973.2020.1761620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Armed Conflict Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23740973.2020.1761620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中东冲突仍然高度区域化和国际化;外部势力之间的对抗在整个地区上演。美国支持的叙利亚民主力量(SDF)解放了isis在叙利亚控制的最后一块领土。ISIS在叙利亚和伊拉克都采取了叛乱战术。伊拉克后isis时代的稳定是暂时的。到2019年,一场大规模的抗议运动颠覆了伊拉克政治,而美伊紧张局势也在伊拉克舞台上上演。在利比亚,随着地区对手更直接的参与,内战进入了一个新的、更残酷的阶段。埃及在西奈半岛与定期袭击作斗争,尽管叛乱开始失去力量。以色列的霸权主义和单边主义塑造了巴以冲突的轨迹。在可预见的未来,叙利亚很可能仍然是一个不稳定的出口国,并继续吸引外部干涉。土耳其对叙利亚的干预使该国孤立于其地区对话者和北约盟国。俄罗斯试图填补美军突然从叙利亚北部撤军造成的外交真空。亲伊朗民兵组织的影响、中央政府的软弱以及美伊紧张关系使伊拉克的稳定处于危险之中。许多全球大国将利比亚冲突视为扩大其在地中海战略影响力的机会。2019年,沙特领导的联盟受到了更严格的审查,尤其是来自美国和英国的审查。特朗普总统的亲以政策疏远了巴勒斯坦人,破坏了美国作为谈判代表的作用。叙利亚问题的全面和包容的政治解决方案仍然难以实现,叙利亚南部正在酝酿一场新的叛乱。ISIS的死灰复燃已经开始。叙利亚北部敌对状态的缓和是可能的,但和平的前景在短期内是不存在的。土耳其军队在叙利亚地区制造了与当地社区的紧张关系,并引发了低强度冲突。ISIS不大可能重新大规模控制领土,但如果没有足够的反叛乱努力,伊拉克将难以消灭剩余的武装分子。沙特领导的联盟对也门战争的兴趣日益下降,这表明和平解决方案可能比《斯德哥尔摩协议》所设想的范围更广。利比亚分裂的加剧引发了人们对可能出现的分裂的担忧。代理人战争不太可能很快结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
4 Middle East and North Africa
Key trends Conflicts in the Middle East remain highly regionalised and internationalised; rivalries among external powers play out across the region. The US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) liberated the last ISIS-held territory in Syria. ISIS adapted by resorting to insurgency tactics, in both Syria and Iraq. Iraq’s post-ISIS stabilisation is tentative. By 2019, a large protest movement upended Iraqi politics, while US–Iran tensions also played out in the Iraqi arena. In Libya, a new, more brutal phase of civil war began, with more direct involvement of regional rivals. Egypt contended with regular attacks in the Sinai Peninsula although the insurgency began to lose its strength. Israeli dominance and unilateralism shaped the trajectory of the Israel–Palestine conflict. Strategic implications Syria is likely to remain an exporter of instability in the foreseeable future and to continue drawing external interference. Turkey’s intervention in Syria isolated the country from its regional interlocutors and NATO allies. Russia attempted to fill the diplomatic vacuum created by the sudden withdrawal of US forces from northern Syria. The influence of pro-Iranian militias, the weakness of the central government and US–Iran tensions put the stability of Iraq at risk. Many global powers see the conflict in Libya as an opportunity to expand their strategic influence in the Mediterranean. The Saudi-led coalition came under greater scrutiny in 2019, from the US and UK in particular. President Trump’s pro-Israeli policies alienated Palestinians and undermined the United States’ role as negotiator. Prospects While a comprehensive and inclusive political settlement in Syria remains elusive, a new insurgency is brewing in southern Syria. The resurgence of ISIS is already under way. A lull in hostilities in northern Syria is possible, but prospects for peace are non-existent in the short term. Turkish forces in Syrian areas are creating tensions with local communities and fuel low-intensity conflict. A return to large-scale territorial control by ISIS is unlikely, but without adequate counter-insurgency efforts, Iraq will struggle to eliminate remaining militants. The Saudi-led coalition’s declining appetite for war in Yemen suggests a potential peace settlement more expansive than the Stockholm Agreement envisaged. Increased fragmentation in Libya raises concerns over a possible partition. Proxy wars are unlikely to end soon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信