{"title":"网络数据与数据库理论的复兴","authors":"Dan Suciu","doi":"10.1109/DASFAA.2001.10002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the seventies, database theory has contributed a number of landmark results that have helped databases become a multi-billion dollar industry, and the database field a mature research area. But as the area matured, theory has had fewer opportunities to contribute to a more and more static field. In PODS 1995, a famous paper by Christos Papadimitriou analyzed the health of database theory and stopped short of saying that the area was in a crisis.","PeriodicalId":243681,"journal":{"name":"RIDE-DM","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web Data and the Resurrection of Database Theory\",\"authors\":\"Dan Suciu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASFAA.2001.10002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the seventies, database theory has contributed a number of landmark results that have helped databases become a multi-billion dollar industry, and the database field a mature research area. But as the area matured, theory has had fewer opportunities to contribute to a more and more static field. In PODS 1995, a famous paper by Christos Papadimitriou analyzed the health of database theory and stopped short of saying that the area was in a crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RIDE-DM\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RIDE-DM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASFAA.2001.10002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RIDE-DM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASFAA.2001.10002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Since the seventies, database theory has contributed a number of landmark results that have helped databases become a multi-billion dollar industry, and the database field a mature research area. But as the area matured, theory has had fewer opportunities to contribute to a more and more static field. In PODS 1995, a famous paper by Christos Papadimitriou analyzed the health of database theory and stopped short of saying that the area was in a crisis.