让世界重新团结起来?在后现代时代恢复忠诚的公民身份

H. Hutchison
{"title":"让世界重新团结起来?在后现代时代恢复忠诚的公民身份","authors":"H. Hutchison","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1368433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archbishop Chaput's book, Render Unto Caesar, signifies the continuation of an impressive and persistent debate about what it means to be Catholic and how Catholics should live out the teachings of the Church in political life in our postmodern society. Render Unto Caesar provides evidence that America's identity and future are endangered by trends reifying radical human autonomy and choice. New threats surface in the form of legislation and judicial interpretations permitting choices that were once considered criminal to be accepted. This trend has been accompanied, if not facilitated, by U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have contributed greatly to the privatization of religion. In light of the emergence of such trends, and given the likelihood that some Catholics, guided by an ongoing process of assimilation, have failed to contest adequately these developments, Archbishop Chaput offers a splendid reply to Aristotle and Professors Scaperlanda and Collett's dense interrogation: how ought we to live together. Such questions are complex because the acceleration of trends favoring individual singularity in our own age signals that many humans prefer to distance themselves from a community and a tradition representing shared values. Instead of accepting the real world of human history they see themselves as an abstract instance of the human species, an autonomous being that remains the epicenter of the universe.Against this inclination, and venturing to engage a nation that is exemplified by a diversity of incommensurable values and world-views, Charles Chaput stresses the special responsibility of Catholic public officials in sorting out the good and calls upon all Catholics to refrain from self-censorship regarding issues that ought to concern them. But in a postmodern society, the inevitable effect of modern liberalism is that some will view religion as \"a private eccentricity\" rather than as a central and formative element of the nation. This viewpoint is commonplace because giving religious voices space in the public square as a singularly important aspect of a believer's life locks in both society and individuality to the past from which modern liberalism seeks to deliver us. While Render Unto Caesar provides a laudable foundation that might enable Catholics to properly influence America's ongoing debate about public policy, the common good and the nation's identity, such a foundation must confront the insistent demands of modern liberalism, and the likelihood that Catholics themselves have been incubated in, and have accepted as normative, a process of equivocation and self-censorship. Given this outcome, the likelihood that American Catholics will surrender to Archbishop Chaput's persuasive intuition is remote.","PeriodicalId":136308,"journal":{"name":"CHR: Christian Culture (Topic) - Forthcoming","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting the World Back Together? Recovering Faithful Citizenship in a Postmodern Age\",\"authors\":\"H. Hutchison\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1368433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Archbishop Chaput's book, Render Unto Caesar, signifies the continuation of an impressive and persistent debate about what it means to be Catholic and how Catholics should live out the teachings of the Church in political life in our postmodern society. Render Unto Caesar provides evidence that America's identity and future are endangered by trends reifying radical human autonomy and choice. New threats surface in the form of legislation and judicial interpretations permitting choices that were once considered criminal to be accepted. This trend has been accompanied, if not facilitated, by U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have contributed greatly to the privatization of religion. In light of the emergence of such trends, and given the likelihood that some Catholics, guided by an ongoing process of assimilation, have failed to contest adequately these developments, Archbishop Chaput offers a splendid reply to Aristotle and Professors Scaperlanda and Collett's dense interrogation: how ought we to live together. Such questions are complex because the acceleration of trends favoring individual singularity in our own age signals that many humans prefer to distance themselves from a community and a tradition representing shared values. Instead of accepting the real world of human history they see themselves as an abstract instance of the human species, an autonomous being that remains the epicenter of the universe.Against this inclination, and venturing to engage a nation that is exemplified by a diversity of incommensurable values and world-views, Charles Chaput stresses the special responsibility of Catholic public officials in sorting out the good and calls upon all Catholics to refrain from self-censorship regarding issues that ought to concern them. But in a postmodern society, the inevitable effect of modern liberalism is that some will view religion as \\\"a private eccentricity\\\" rather than as a central and formative element of the nation. This viewpoint is commonplace because giving religious voices space in the public square as a singularly important aspect of a believer's life locks in both society and individuality to the past from which modern liberalism seeks to deliver us. While Render Unto Caesar provides a laudable foundation that might enable Catholics to properly influence America's ongoing debate about public policy, the common good and the nation's identity, such a foundation must confront the insistent demands of modern liberalism, and the likelihood that Catholics themselves have been incubated in, and have accepted as normative, a process of equivocation and self-censorship. Given this outcome, the likelihood that American Catholics will surrender to Archbishop Chaput's persuasive intuition is remote.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHR: Christian Culture (Topic) - Forthcoming\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHR: Christian Culture (Topic) - Forthcoming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHR: Christian Culture (Topic) - Forthcoming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

查普特大主教的书《献给凯撒》(Render to Caesar)标志着一场令人印象深刻的持续辩论的继续,这场辩论的主题是:作为天主教徒意味着什么,以及天主教徒应该如何在我们后现代社会的政治生活中践行教会的教义。《向凯撒呈递》证明,美国的身份和未来正受到人类激进自主和选择的物化趋势的威胁。新的威胁以立法和司法解释的形式出现,允许曾经被认为是犯罪的选择被接受。美国最高法院的判决对宗教私有化做出了巨大贡献,这一趋势即使没有得到促进,也一直伴随着这一趋势。鉴于这种趋势的出现,并且考虑到一些天主教徒在持续的同化过程的指导下,未能充分地对这些发展提出质疑的可能性,大主教查普特对亚里士多德和斯卡帕兰达教授和科莱特教授的密集询问提供了一个精彩的回答:我们应该如何共同生活。这些问题是复杂的,因为在我们这个时代,倾向于个人独特性的趋势的加速表明,许多人更愿意与代表共同价值观的社区和传统保持距离。他们不接受人类历史的真实世界,而是把自己视为人类物种的一个抽象实例,一个仍然是宇宙中心的自主存在。查尔斯·查普特(Charles Chaput)反对这种倾向,并冒险与一个以不可比较的价值观和世界观的多样性为例的国家接触,他强调天主教公职人员在整理善行方面的特殊责任,并呼吁所有天主教徒不要对应该与他们有关的问题进行自我审查。但在后现代社会,现代自由主义不可避免的影响是,一些人将把宗教视为“私人怪癖”,而不是国家的中心和形成因素。这种观点很常见,因为在公共广场上给予宗教声音空间,作为信徒生活中一个特别重要的方面,将社会和个性锁在过去,而现代自由主义试图将我们从过去中解脱出来。虽然“归凯撒”提供了一个值得称赞的基础,可能使天主教徒能够适当地影响美国正在进行的关于公共政策、共同利益和国家身份的辩论,但这样一个基础必须面对现代自由主义的坚持要求,以及天主教徒本身在一个模棱两可和自我审查的过程中孵化并被接受为规范的可能性。鉴于这一结果,美国天主教徒向查普特大主教有说服力的直觉屈服的可能性微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Putting the World Back Together? Recovering Faithful Citizenship in a Postmodern Age
Archbishop Chaput's book, Render Unto Caesar, signifies the continuation of an impressive and persistent debate about what it means to be Catholic and how Catholics should live out the teachings of the Church in political life in our postmodern society. Render Unto Caesar provides evidence that America's identity and future are endangered by trends reifying radical human autonomy and choice. New threats surface in the form of legislation and judicial interpretations permitting choices that were once considered criminal to be accepted. This trend has been accompanied, if not facilitated, by U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have contributed greatly to the privatization of religion. In light of the emergence of such trends, and given the likelihood that some Catholics, guided by an ongoing process of assimilation, have failed to contest adequately these developments, Archbishop Chaput offers a splendid reply to Aristotle and Professors Scaperlanda and Collett's dense interrogation: how ought we to live together. Such questions are complex because the acceleration of trends favoring individual singularity in our own age signals that many humans prefer to distance themselves from a community and a tradition representing shared values. Instead of accepting the real world of human history they see themselves as an abstract instance of the human species, an autonomous being that remains the epicenter of the universe.Against this inclination, and venturing to engage a nation that is exemplified by a diversity of incommensurable values and world-views, Charles Chaput stresses the special responsibility of Catholic public officials in sorting out the good and calls upon all Catholics to refrain from self-censorship regarding issues that ought to concern them. But in a postmodern society, the inevitable effect of modern liberalism is that some will view religion as "a private eccentricity" rather than as a central and formative element of the nation. This viewpoint is commonplace because giving religious voices space in the public square as a singularly important aspect of a believer's life locks in both society and individuality to the past from which modern liberalism seeks to deliver us. While Render Unto Caesar provides a laudable foundation that might enable Catholics to properly influence America's ongoing debate about public policy, the common good and the nation's identity, such a foundation must confront the insistent demands of modern liberalism, and the likelihood that Catholics themselves have been incubated in, and have accepted as normative, a process of equivocation and self-censorship. Given this outcome, the likelihood that American Catholics will surrender to Archbishop Chaput's persuasive intuition is remote.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信