基于ARSkNN的葡萄酒品质与蛋白质合成的比较预测

Ashish Kumar, Roheet Bhatnagar, S. Srivastava, Arjun Chauhan
{"title":"基于ARSkNN的葡萄酒品质与蛋白质合成的比较预测","authors":"Ashish Kumar, Roheet Bhatnagar, S. Srivastava, Arjun Chauhan","doi":"10.4018/ijitpm.2020100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The amount of data available and information over the past few decades has grown manifold and will only increase exponentially. The ability to harvest and manipulate information from this data has become a crucial activity for effective and faster development. Multiple algorithms and approaches have been developed in order to harvest information from this data. These algorithms have different approaches and therefore result in varied outputs in terms of performance and interpretation. Due to their functionality, different algorithms perform differently on different datasets. In order to compare the effectiveness of these algorithms, they are run on different datasets under a given set of fixed restrictions (e.g., hardware platform, etc.). This paper is an in-depth analysis of different algorithms based on trivial classifier algorithm, kNN, and the newly developed ARSkNN. The algorithms were executed on three different datasets, and analysis was done by evaluating their performance taking into consideration the accuracy percentage and execution time as performance measures.","PeriodicalId":346646,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol.","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Prediction of Wine Quality and Protein Synthesis Using ARSkNN\",\"authors\":\"Ashish Kumar, Roheet Bhatnagar, S. Srivastava, Arjun Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijitpm.2020100103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The amount of data available and information over the past few decades has grown manifold and will only increase exponentially. The ability to harvest and manipulate information from this data has become a crucial activity for effective and faster development. Multiple algorithms and approaches have been developed in order to harvest information from this data. These algorithms have different approaches and therefore result in varied outputs in terms of performance and interpretation. Due to their functionality, different algorithms perform differently on different datasets. In order to compare the effectiveness of these algorithms, they are run on different datasets under a given set of fixed restrictions (e.g., hardware platform, etc.). This paper is an in-depth analysis of different algorithms based on trivial classifier algorithm, kNN, and the newly developed ARSkNN. The algorithms were executed on three different datasets, and analysis was done by evaluating their performance taking into consideration the accuracy percentage and execution time as performance measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol.\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitpm.2020100103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitpm.2020100103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,可用的数据和信息的数量已经成倍增长,而且只会呈指数级增长。从这些数据中获取和操作信息的能力已经成为有效和快速开发的关键活动。为了从这些数据中获取信息,已经开发了多种算法和方法。这些算法有不同的方法,因此在性能和解释方面产生不同的输出。由于它们的功能不同,不同的算法在不同的数据集上表现不同。为了比较这些算法的有效性,它们在给定的一组固定限制(例如,硬件平台等)下在不同的数据集上运行。本文对基于琐碎分类器算法、kNN和新开发的ARSkNN的不同算法进行了深入的分析。在三个不同的数据集上执行算法,并将准确率和执行时间作为性能指标,通过评估其性能来进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Prediction of Wine Quality and Protein Synthesis Using ARSkNN
The amount of data available and information over the past few decades has grown manifold and will only increase exponentially. The ability to harvest and manipulate information from this data has become a crucial activity for effective and faster development. Multiple algorithms and approaches have been developed in order to harvest information from this data. These algorithms have different approaches and therefore result in varied outputs in terms of performance and interpretation. Due to their functionality, different algorithms perform differently on different datasets. In order to compare the effectiveness of these algorithms, they are run on different datasets under a given set of fixed restrictions (e.g., hardware platform, etc.). This paper is an in-depth analysis of different algorithms based on trivial classifier algorithm, kNN, and the newly developed ARSkNN. The algorithms were executed on three different datasets, and analysis was done by evaluating their performance taking into consideration the accuracy percentage and execution time as performance measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信