{"title":"没有显式上下文的纯类型系统","authors":"H. Geuvers, R. Krebbers, J. McKinna, F. Wiedijk","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.34.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an approach to type theory in which the typing judgments do not have explicit contexts. Instead of judgments of shape G‘ A : B, our systems just have judgments of shape A : B. A key feature is that we distinguish free and bound variables even in pseudo-terms. Specifically we give the rules of the ‘Pure Type System’ class of type theories in this style. We prove that the typing judgments of these systems correspond in a natural way with those of Pure Type Systems as traditionally formulated. I.e., our systems have exactly the same well-typed terms as traditional presentations of type theory. Our system can be seen as a type theory in which all type judgments share an identical, infinite, typing context that has infinitely many variables for each possible type. For this reason we call our system G¥. This name means to suggest that our type judgment A : B should be read as G¥‘ A : B, with a fixed infinite type context called G¥.","PeriodicalId":262518,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pure Type Systems without Explicit Contexts\",\"authors\":\"H. Geuvers, R. Krebbers, J. McKinna, F. Wiedijk\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.34.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an approach to type theory in which the typing judgments do not have explicit contexts. Instead of judgments of shape G‘ A : B, our systems just have judgments of shape A : B. A key feature is that we distinguish free and bound variables even in pseudo-terms. Specifically we give the rules of the ‘Pure Type System’ class of type theories in this style. We prove that the typing judgments of these systems correspond in a natural way with those of Pure Type Systems as traditionally formulated. I.e., our systems have exactly the same well-typed terms as traditional presentations of type theory. Our system can be seen as a type theory in which all type judgments share an identical, infinite, typing context that has infinitely many variables for each possible type. For this reason we call our system G¥. This name means to suggest that our type judgment A : B should be read as G¥‘ A : B, with a fixed infinite type context called G¥.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.34.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.34.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We present an approach to type theory in which the typing judgments do not have explicit contexts. Instead of judgments of shape G‘ A : B, our systems just have judgments of shape A : B. A key feature is that we distinguish free and bound variables even in pseudo-terms. Specifically we give the rules of the ‘Pure Type System’ class of type theories in this style. We prove that the typing judgments of these systems correspond in a natural way with those of Pure Type Systems as traditionally formulated. I.e., our systems have exactly the same well-typed terms as traditional presentations of type theory. Our system can be seen as a type theory in which all type judgments share an identical, infinite, typing context that has infinitely many variables for each possible type. For this reason we call our system G¥. This name means to suggest that our type judgment A : B should be read as G¥‘ A : B, with a fixed infinite type context called G¥.