使用代码审查评估对可维护性的理解

E. Tempero, Yu-Cheng Tu
{"title":"使用代码审查评估对可维护性的理解","authors":"E. Tempero, Yu-Cheng Tu","doi":"10.1145/3441636.3442303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintainability is an important quality attribute of code, and so should be a key learning outcome for software engineering programmes. This raises the question of how to assess this learning outcome. In this practical report we describe how we exploited the code review mechanism provided by GitHub, the “pull request”, to assess students’ understanding of maintainability. It requires a slightly non-standard workflow by the students and a reporting tool to assemble the code review comments in a form suitable for assessment. We give the details of what we learned to make it work that should allow others to conduct similar kinds of assessment.","PeriodicalId":334899,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Computing Education Conference","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Understanding of Maintainability using Code Review\",\"authors\":\"E. Tempero, Yu-Cheng Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3441636.3442303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maintainability is an important quality attribute of code, and so should be a key learning outcome for software engineering programmes. This raises the question of how to assess this learning outcome. In this practical report we describe how we exploited the code review mechanism provided by GitHub, the “pull request”, to assess students’ understanding of maintainability. It requires a slightly non-standard workflow by the students and a reporting tool to assemble the code review comments in a form suitable for assessment. We give the details of what we learned to make it work that should allow others to conduct similar kinds of assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Computing Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Computing Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3441636.3442303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Computing Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3441636.3442303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

可维护性是代码的重要质量属性,因此应该是软件工程项目的关键学习成果。这就提出了如何评估这种学习成果的问题。在这个实践报告中,我们描述了我们如何利用GitHub提供的代码审查机制,即“pull request”,来评估学生对可维护性的理解。它需要学生稍微不标准的工作流程和一个报告工具,以适合评估的形式组装代码审查评论。我们给出了我们所学到的使它起作用的细节,这应该允许其他人进行类似的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Understanding of Maintainability using Code Review
Maintainability is an important quality attribute of code, and so should be a key learning outcome for software engineering programmes. This raises the question of how to assess this learning outcome. In this practical report we describe how we exploited the code review mechanism provided by GitHub, the “pull request”, to assess students’ understanding of maintainability. It requires a slightly non-standard workflow by the students and a reporting tool to assemble the code review comments in a form suitable for assessment. We give the details of what we learned to make it work that should allow others to conduct similar kinds of assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信