适应气候变化的宏观财政影响

M. Bellon, Zamid Aligishiev, E. Massetti
{"title":"适应气候变化的宏观财政影响","authors":"M. Bellon, Zamid Aligishiev, E. Massetti","doi":"10.5089/9798400201608.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DISCLAIMER: The IMF Notes Series aims to quickly disseminate succinct IMF analysis on critical economic issues to member countries and the broader policy community. The IMF Staff Climate Notes provide analysis related to the impact of climate change on macroeconomic and financial stability, including on mitigation, adaptation, and transition. The views expressed in IMF Staff Climate Notes are those of the author(s), although they do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, or its Executive Board, or its management. This Staff Climate Note is part of a series of three Notes (IMF Staff Climate Note 2022/001, 2022/002, and 2022/003) that discuss fiscal policies for climate change adaptation. The first Note (Bellon and Massetti 2022a, henceforth Note 1) examines the economic principles that can guide the integration of climate change adaptation into fiscal policy. It argues that climate change adaptation should be part of a holistic, sustainable, and equitable development strategy. To maximize the impact of scarce resources, governments need to prioritize among all development programs, including but not limited to adaptation. To this end, they can use cost-benefit analysis while ensuring that the decision-making process reflects society’s preferences about equity and uncertainty. This second Note discusses the macro-fiscal implications of climate change adaptation. A third Note (Bellon and Massetti 2022b, henceforth Note 3) considers how to translate adaptation principles and estimates of climate impacts into effective policies. It argues that adaptation solutions can be guided by an extension of the IMF’s (2019b) three-pillar disaster resilience strategy to address changes in both extreme and average weather, for all countries. It suggests that public financial management (PFM) institutions can support an efficient implementation of adaptation solutions by factoring climate risks and adaptation plans into budgets and macro-frameworks, and in the management of public investment, assets, and liabilities. A review suggests adaptation needs while being challenged by limited fiscal space, limited capacity, or both, calling for additional support from the international community. To help guide national fiscal policies, countries could integrate climate risks and the cost of adaptation into their macro-fiscal frameworks. Shock scenarios are useful to reflect short-term impacts of climate disasters, while the long-term analysis of risks and uncertainties surrounding climate change requires scenarios that cover impacts from changes in both average and extreme events, as well as adaptation policies. Desmet and others show that relocation, in the form of migration and the rise of new productive clusters away from exposed coasts, is an effective adaptation strategy and can reduce GDP losses by a factor of 10. For Suriname, their model predicts annual costs below 0.3 percent of GDP and migration outflows that would reduce population by 2.4 percent by 2200. Taken together, these studies highlight the important role of adaptation policies in long-term scenarios, the need to explain adaptation assumptions in projections, and suggest that a well-planned gradual approach starting now can be cost effective. the Investment, and model of to analyze natural disasters and adaptation infrastructure. The DIGNAD model, developed in and a dynamic low-income or emerging-country open-economy model that incorporates natural disasters and resilient infrastructure to examine the nexus between public investment and growth, different financing strategies (external concessional, external commercial, and domestic), and fiscal reaction rules. It captures high rates of return on public capital, either standard or resilient, as as significant inefficiencies in public investment and capacity constraints, are pervasive in developing economies. model captures the main mechanisms and policy issues of interest for debt sustainability analysis, those associated with the linkages between public adaptation investment, economic growth, and debt. (1) during increase risk premium for borrowing costs. Investment in adaptation costlier investment in infrastructure the inflicted natural seawalls) marginal other","PeriodicalId":412934,"journal":{"name":"Staff Climate Notes","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macro-Fiscal Implications of Adaptation to Climate Change\",\"authors\":\"M. Bellon, Zamid Aligishiev, E. Massetti\",\"doi\":\"10.5089/9798400201608.066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"DISCLAIMER: The IMF Notes Series aims to quickly disseminate succinct IMF analysis on critical economic issues to member countries and the broader policy community. The IMF Staff Climate Notes provide analysis related to the impact of climate change on macroeconomic and financial stability, including on mitigation, adaptation, and transition. The views expressed in IMF Staff Climate Notes are those of the author(s), although they do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, or its Executive Board, or its management. This Staff Climate Note is part of a series of three Notes (IMF Staff Climate Note 2022/001, 2022/002, and 2022/003) that discuss fiscal policies for climate change adaptation. The first Note (Bellon and Massetti 2022a, henceforth Note 1) examines the economic principles that can guide the integration of climate change adaptation into fiscal policy. It argues that climate change adaptation should be part of a holistic, sustainable, and equitable development strategy. To maximize the impact of scarce resources, governments need to prioritize among all development programs, including but not limited to adaptation. To this end, they can use cost-benefit analysis while ensuring that the decision-making process reflects society’s preferences about equity and uncertainty. This second Note discusses the macro-fiscal implications of climate change adaptation. A third Note (Bellon and Massetti 2022b, henceforth Note 3) considers how to translate adaptation principles and estimates of climate impacts into effective policies. It argues that adaptation solutions can be guided by an extension of the IMF’s (2019b) three-pillar disaster resilience strategy to address changes in both extreme and average weather, for all countries. It suggests that public financial management (PFM) institutions can support an efficient implementation of adaptation solutions by factoring climate risks and adaptation plans into budgets and macro-frameworks, and in the management of public investment, assets, and liabilities. A review suggests adaptation needs while being challenged by limited fiscal space, limited capacity, or both, calling for additional support from the international community. To help guide national fiscal policies, countries could integrate climate risks and the cost of adaptation into their macro-fiscal frameworks. Shock scenarios are useful to reflect short-term impacts of climate disasters, while the long-term analysis of risks and uncertainties surrounding climate change requires scenarios that cover impacts from changes in both average and extreme events, as well as adaptation policies. Desmet and others show that relocation, in the form of migration and the rise of new productive clusters away from exposed coasts, is an effective adaptation strategy and can reduce GDP losses by a factor of 10. For Suriname, their model predicts annual costs below 0.3 percent of GDP and migration outflows that would reduce population by 2.4 percent by 2200. Taken together, these studies highlight the important role of adaptation policies in long-term scenarios, the need to explain adaptation assumptions in projections, and suggest that a well-planned gradual approach starting now can be cost effective. the Investment, and model of to analyze natural disasters and adaptation infrastructure. The DIGNAD model, developed in and a dynamic low-income or emerging-country open-economy model that incorporates natural disasters and resilient infrastructure to examine the nexus between public investment and growth, different financing strategies (external concessional, external commercial, and domestic), and fiscal reaction rules. It captures high rates of return on public capital, either standard or resilient, as as significant inefficiencies in public investment and capacity constraints, are pervasive in developing economies. model captures the main mechanisms and policy issues of interest for debt sustainability analysis, those associated with the linkages between public adaptation investment, economic growth, and debt. (1) during increase risk premium for borrowing costs. Investment in adaptation costlier investment in infrastructure the inflicted natural seawalls) marginal other\",\"PeriodicalId\":412934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Staff Climate Notes\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Staff Climate Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400201608.066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Staff Climate Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400201608.066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

免责声明:国际货币基金组织讲义系列旨在向成员国和更广泛的政策界迅速传播国际货币基金组织对关键经济问题的简明分析。《基金组织工作人员气候说明》分析了气候变化对宏观经济和金融稳定的影响,包括对减缓、适应和过渡的影响。基金组织工作人员气候说明所表达的观点是作者的观点,尽管它们不一定代表基金组织或其执董会或其管理层的观点。本工作人员气候说明是讨论气候变化适应财政政策的三份系列说明(基金组织工作人员气候说明2022/001、2022/002和2022/003)的一部分。第一份报告(Bellon and Massetti 2022a,下文为报告1)考察了可以指导将气候变化适应纳入财政政策的经济原则。报告认为,适应气候变化应成为全面、可持续和公平的发展战略的一部分。为了最大限度地发挥稀缺资源的影响,政府需要在所有发展计划中优先考虑,包括但不限于适应。为此,他们可以使用成本效益分析,同时确保决策过程反映社会对公平和不确定性的偏好。第二份说明讨论适应气候变化的宏观财政影响。第三份注释(Bellon和Massetti 2022b,以下简称注释3)考虑了如何将适应原则和对气候影响的估计转化为有效的政策。报告认为,适应解决方案可以通过延长国际货币基金组织(2019b)三支柱抗灾战略来指导,以应对所有国家极端和平均天气的变化。研究表明,公共财政管理机构可以通过将气候风险和适应计划纳入预算和宏观框架以及公共投资、资产和负债管理,支持有效实施适应解决方案。一项审查表明,适应需要同时受到有限的财政空间或有限的能力,或两者兼而有之的挑战,呼吁国际社会提供更多支持。为了帮助指导国家财政政策,各国可以将气候风险和适应成本纳入其宏观财政框架。冲击情景有助于反映气候灾害的短期影响,而对气候变化风险和不确定性的长期分析则需要情景涵盖平均和极端事件变化的影响以及适应政策。Desmet等人的研究表明,以移民和远离暴露海岸的新生产集群的形式进行的重新安置是一种有效的适应战略,可以将国内生产总值损失减少10倍。他们的模型预测,苏里南的年成本低于GDP的0.3%,到2200年,移民外流将使人口减少2.4%。综上所述,这些研究突出了适应政策在长期情景中的重要作用,说明了在预测中解释适应假设的必要性,并表明从现在开始采取计划周密的渐进方法可能具有成本效益。投资,以及分析自然灾害和适应基础设施的模型。DIGNAD模型是一个动态的低收入或新兴国家开放经济模型,将自然灾害和弹性基础设施纳入其中,以研究公共投资与增长、不同融资策略(外部优惠、外部商业和国内)以及财政反应规则之间的关系。它反映了公共资本(无论是标准的还是弹性的)的高回报率,以及发展中经济体普遍存在的公共投资效率严重低下和能力限制。模型捕捉了债务可持续性分析的主要机制和政策问题,这些问题与公共适应投资、经济增长和债务之间的联系有关。(1)期间增加借款成本的风险溢价。对适应环境的投资(对基础设施的投资(对天然海堤的投资))
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macro-Fiscal Implications of Adaptation to Climate Change
DISCLAIMER: The IMF Notes Series aims to quickly disseminate succinct IMF analysis on critical economic issues to member countries and the broader policy community. The IMF Staff Climate Notes provide analysis related to the impact of climate change on macroeconomic and financial stability, including on mitigation, adaptation, and transition. The views expressed in IMF Staff Climate Notes are those of the author(s), although they do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, or its Executive Board, or its management. This Staff Climate Note is part of a series of three Notes (IMF Staff Climate Note 2022/001, 2022/002, and 2022/003) that discuss fiscal policies for climate change adaptation. The first Note (Bellon and Massetti 2022a, henceforth Note 1) examines the economic principles that can guide the integration of climate change adaptation into fiscal policy. It argues that climate change adaptation should be part of a holistic, sustainable, and equitable development strategy. To maximize the impact of scarce resources, governments need to prioritize among all development programs, including but not limited to adaptation. To this end, they can use cost-benefit analysis while ensuring that the decision-making process reflects society’s preferences about equity and uncertainty. This second Note discusses the macro-fiscal implications of climate change adaptation. A third Note (Bellon and Massetti 2022b, henceforth Note 3) considers how to translate adaptation principles and estimates of climate impacts into effective policies. It argues that adaptation solutions can be guided by an extension of the IMF’s (2019b) three-pillar disaster resilience strategy to address changes in both extreme and average weather, for all countries. It suggests that public financial management (PFM) institutions can support an efficient implementation of adaptation solutions by factoring climate risks and adaptation plans into budgets and macro-frameworks, and in the management of public investment, assets, and liabilities. A review suggests adaptation needs while being challenged by limited fiscal space, limited capacity, or both, calling for additional support from the international community. To help guide national fiscal policies, countries could integrate climate risks and the cost of adaptation into their macro-fiscal frameworks. Shock scenarios are useful to reflect short-term impacts of climate disasters, while the long-term analysis of risks and uncertainties surrounding climate change requires scenarios that cover impacts from changes in both average and extreme events, as well as adaptation policies. Desmet and others show that relocation, in the form of migration and the rise of new productive clusters away from exposed coasts, is an effective adaptation strategy and can reduce GDP losses by a factor of 10. For Suriname, their model predicts annual costs below 0.3 percent of GDP and migration outflows that would reduce population by 2.4 percent by 2200. Taken together, these studies highlight the important role of adaptation policies in long-term scenarios, the need to explain adaptation assumptions in projections, and suggest that a well-planned gradual approach starting now can be cost effective. the Investment, and model of to analyze natural disasters and adaptation infrastructure. The DIGNAD model, developed in and a dynamic low-income or emerging-country open-economy model that incorporates natural disasters and resilient infrastructure to examine the nexus between public investment and growth, different financing strategies (external concessional, external commercial, and domestic), and fiscal reaction rules. It captures high rates of return on public capital, either standard or resilient, as as significant inefficiencies in public investment and capacity constraints, are pervasive in developing economies. model captures the main mechanisms and policy issues of interest for debt sustainability analysis, those associated with the linkages between public adaptation investment, economic growth, and debt. (1) during increase risk premium for borrowing costs. Investment in adaptation costlier investment in infrastructure the inflicted natural seawalls) marginal other
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信