不同分辨率任务剖面下的日前能源管理策略敏感性分析

Xiangqiang Wu, Zhongting Tang, T. Kerekes
{"title":"不同分辨率任务剖面下的日前能源管理策略敏感性分析","authors":"Xiangqiang Wu, Zhongting Tang, T. Kerekes","doi":"10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy management strategies directly influence the performance (e.g., cost) of residential PV systems. In state-of-the-art, most forecast-based energy management strategies adopt hour resolution to make decisions, which may have poor robustness and flexibility to fast-changing weather conditions. This paper compares the sensitivity of three typical operation strategies including maximum self-consumption, mixed integer linear programming, and particle swarm optimization under different kinds of resolutions and weather. The results show that the maximum self-consumption strategy has the best robustness and can utilize the battery most at the expense of total cost. In terms of cost, the mixed integer linear programming strategy performs best on the sunny day, and has the best scheduled result on the partly-cloudy day, but the particle swarm optimization strategy performs best in the real case.","PeriodicalId":315989,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity Analysis of Day-Ahead Energy Management Strategies under Variant Resolution Mission Profiles\",\"authors\":\"Xiangqiang Wu, Zhongting Tang, T. Kerekes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Energy management strategies directly influence the performance (e.g., cost) of residential PV systems. In state-of-the-art, most forecast-based energy management strategies adopt hour resolution to make decisions, which may have poor robustness and flexibility to fast-changing weather conditions. This paper compares the sensitivity of three typical operation strategies including maximum self-consumption, mixed integer linear programming, and particle swarm optimization under different kinds of resolutions and weather. The results show that the maximum self-consumption strategy has the best robustness and can utilize the battery most at the expense of total cost. In terms of cost, the mixed integer linear programming strategy performs best on the sunny day, and has the best scheduled result on the partly-cloudy day, but the particle swarm optimization strategy performs best in the real case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源管理策略直接影响住宅光伏系统的性能(如成本)。在最先进的技术中,大多数基于预测的能源管理策略采用小时分辨率来做出决策,这可能对快速变化的天气条件具有较差的稳健性和灵活性。比较了最大自耗、混合整数线性规划和粒子群优化三种典型运行策略在不同分辨率和天气条件下的灵敏度。结果表明,最大自耗策略具有最佳的鲁棒性,能够以总成本为代价最大限度地利用电池。在成本方面,混合整数线性规划策略在晴天的调度效果最好,在阴天的调度效果最好,而粒子群优化策略在实际情况下的调度效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitivity Analysis of Day-Ahead Energy Management Strategies under Variant Resolution Mission Profiles
Energy management strategies directly influence the performance (e.g., cost) of residential PV systems. In state-of-the-art, most forecast-based energy management strategies adopt hour resolution to make decisions, which may have poor robustness and flexibility to fast-changing weather conditions. This paper compares the sensitivity of three typical operation strategies including maximum self-consumption, mixed integer linear programming, and particle swarm optimization under different kinds of resolutions and weather. The results show that the maximum self-consumption strategy has the best robustness and can utilize the battery most at the expense of total cost. In terms of cost, the mixed integer linear programming strategy performs best on the sunny day, and has the best scheduled result on the partly-cloudy day, but the particle swarm optimization strategy performs best in the real case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信