从联邦实验室到应用和市场的技术转移过程的模型和指标

A. Rubenstein
{"title":"从联邦实验室到应用和市场的技术转移过程的模型和指标","authors":"A. Rubenstein","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author and his colleagues have worked with over a dozen federal agencies (as well as many industrial firms) on the process of getting new technology out of their labs and into their own innovation programs and/or into the broader markets of industry and other agencies. The focus of this paper is on metrics and flow models for the outputs, at each stage of the process, and the barriers and facilitators that impede or enhance the flow. It deals with the notorious “Valley of Death” that slows or sinks the flow of items of technology at various stages of the R&D/Innovation (R&D/I) process. It suggests a systematic methodology for identifying and measuring the impacts, outputs, barriers, and facilitators encountered in the flow. Criteria trees are suggested for connecting stage outputs to the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of the operating units, parent organizations, and other sponsors and clients served by the labs. Some examples of common barriers and facilitators are given, including: the over-focus of many Tech Transfer Offices on “paper” Intellectual Property (IP), such as patents and licenses vs. “real” outputs and impacts such as new products and applications of technology that are transferred to and adopted by the various types of potential users of the technology. Specific examples are also drawn from studies by the author and his colleagues in the fields of: aerospace and automotive research; agriculture; transportation; healthcare; military R&D; and environment, energy, and materials R&D.","PeriodicalId":185147,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models and metrics for the technology transfer process from federal labs to application and the market\",\"authors\":\"A. Rubenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author and his colleagues have worked with over a dozen federal agencies (as well as many industrial firms) on the process of getting new technology out of their labs and into their own innovation programs and/or into the broader markets of industry and other agencies. The focus of this paper is on metrics and flow models for the outputs, at each stage of the process, and the barriers and facilitators that impede or enhance the flow. It deals with the notorious “Valley of Death” that slows or sinks the flow of items of technology at various stages of the R&D/Innovation (R&D/I) process. It suggests a systematic methodology for identifying and measuring the impacts, outputs, barriers, and facilitators encountered in the flow. Criteria trees are suggested for connecting stage outputs to the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of the operating units, parent organizations, and other sponsors and clients served by the labs. Some examples of common barriers and facilitators are given, including: the over-focus of many Tech Transfer Offices on “paper” Intellectual Property (IP), such as patents and licenses vs. “real” outputs and impacts such as new products and applications of technology that are transferred to and adopted by the various types of potential users of the technology. Specific examples are also drawn from studies by the author and his colleagues in the fields of: aerospace and automotive research; agriculture; transportation; healthcare; military R&D; and environment, energy, and materials R&D.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者和他的同事们曾与十多个联邦机构(以及许多工业公司)合作,将新技术从他们的实验室引入他们自己的创新项目和/或进入更广阔的工业市场和其他机构。本文的重点是在过程的每个阶段,输出的度量和流程模型,以及阻碍或增强流程的障碍和促进因素。它涉及臭名昭著的“死亡之谷”,在研发/创新(R&D/I)过程的各个阶段减缓或沉没技术项目的流动。它提出了一种系统的方法来识别和衡量在流程中遇到的影响、产出、障碍和促进因素。标准树被建议用于连接阶段输出到关键成功因素(csf)的操作单位,母组织,和其他赞助商和客户的实验室服务。列举了一些常见障碍和促进因素的例子,包括:许多技术转让办公室过分关注“纸面”知识产权(IP),如专利和许可证,而不是“实际”产出和影响,如转让给各种技术潜在用户并被其采用的新产品和技术应用。具体的例子也从作者和他的同事在以下领域的研究中得出:航空航天和汽车研究;农业;交通运输;医疗保健;军事研发;以及环境、能源和材料研发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models and metrics for the technology transfer process from federal labs to application and the market
The author and his colleagues have worked with over a dozen federal agencies (as well as many industrial firms) on the process of getting new technology out of their labs and into their own innovation programs and/or into the broader markets of industry and other agencies. The focus of this paper is on metrics and flow models for the outputs, at each stage of the process, and the barriers and facilitators that impede or enhance the flow. It deals with the notorious “Valley of Death” that slows or sinks the flow of items of technology at various stages of the R&D/Innovation (R&D/I) process. It suggests a systematic methodology for identifying and measuring the impacts, outputs, barriers, and facilitators encountered in the flow. Criteria trees are suggested for connecting stage outputs to the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of the operating units, parent organizations, and other sponsors and clients served by the labs. Some examples of common barriers and facilitators are given, including: the over-focus of many Tech Transfer Offices on “paper” Intellectual Property (IP), such as patents and licenses vs. “real” outputs and impacts such as new products and applications of technology that are transferred to and adopted by the various types of potential users of the technology. Specific examples are also drawn from studies by the author and his colleagues in the fields of: aerospace and automotive research; agriculture; transportation; healthcare; military R&D; and environment, energy, and materials R&D.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信