运用非线性分析方法对双边跳跃着陆任务进行视觉评价和图形表示

P. Volf, W. Hsu, J. Hejda, Yi-Jia Lin, P. Kutílek, T. Sugiarto, Marek Sokol, Lýdie Leová, Hsiao-Liang Tsai, Ssu-Yu Chang, Li-Xin Tang
{"title":"运用非线性分析方法对双边跳跃着陆任务进行视觉评价和图形表示","authors":"P. Volf, W. Hsu, J. Hejda, Yi-Jia Lin, P. Kutílek, T. Sugiarto, Marek Sokol, Lýdie Leová, Hsiao-Liang Tsai, Ssu-Yu Chang, Li-Xin Tang","doi":"10.1109/ECBIOS57802.2023.10218598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonlinear analysis methods enable the evaluation of signal chaos parameters such as variability, persistence, and complexity. In order to assess the differences between individual bilateral jump landing tasks and between IMU estimated angle and the gold standard, data obtained from Qualysis optical Mocap (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden) and Delsys inertial measurement systems (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) were used. 24 subjects were recruited in this study (6 females and 18 males, age: 22.6 ± 2.6 years old; height: 172.6 ± 10.3 cm; weight: 72.2 ± 16.02 kg). All of them perform double-leg landing tasks from a 30 cm height platform and a distance of half of their body height while wearing 8 IMU sensors on the sternum, L5, bilateral thigh, shank, and foot. In addition to IMU sensors on 8 locations, the subject wore retroreflective markers on the upper and lower parts for 3D motion capture data analysis. Multiscale Poincaré plots and recurrent quantification analysis were employed for subjective visual evaluation. Nonlinear analysis methods are promising practical applications, particularly with the use of recurrent quantification analysis and multiscale Poincaré plots for easier interpretation. In the case of multiscale Poincaré analysis, a difference between the estimated angle from the IMU and the gold standard in terms of confidence ellipse parameters was found. Additionally, the quantification parameters of these methods are suitable for integration with other evaluation methods in the time domain, frequency domain, and time-frequency domain.","PeriodicalId":334600,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Nonlinear Analysis Methods for Visual Evaluation and Graphical Representation of Bilateral Jump Landing Tasks\",\"authors\":\"P. Volf, W. Hsu, J. Hejda, Yi-Jia Lin, P. Kutílek, T. Sugiarto, Marek Sokol, Lýdie Leová, Hsiao-Liang Tsai, Ssu-Yu Chang, Li-Xin Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBIOS57802.2023.10218598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nonlinear analysis methods enable the evaluation of signal chaos parameters such as variability, persistence, and complexity. In order to assess the differences between individual bilateral jump landing tasks and between IMU estimated angle and the gold standard, data obtained from Qualysis optical Mocap (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden) and Delsys inertial measurement systems (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) were used. 24 subjects were recruited in this study (6 females and 18 males, age: 22.6 ± 2.6 years old; height: 172.6 ± 10.3 cm; weight: 72.2 ± 16.02 kg). All of them perform double-leg landing tasks from a 30 cm height platform and a distance of half of their body height while wearing 8 IMU sensors on the sternum, L5, bilateral thigh, shank, and foot. In addition to IMU sensors on 8 locations, the subject wore retroreflective markers on the upper and lower parts for 3D motion capture data analysis. Multiscale Poincaré plots and recurrent quantification analysis were employed for subjective visual evaluation. Nonlinear analysis methods are promising practical applications, particularly with the use of recurrent quantification analysis and multiscale Poincaré plots for easier interpretation. In the case of multiscale Poincaré analysis, a difference between the estimated angle from the IMU and the gold standard in terms of confidence ellipse parameters was found. Additionally, the quantification parameters of these methods are suitable for integration with other evaluation methods in the time domain, frequency domain, and time-frequency domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBIOS57802.2023.10218598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBIOS57802.2023.10218598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非线性分析方法能够评估信号混沌参数,如可变性、持久性和复杂性。为了评估个体双边跳跃着陆任务之间的差异以及IMU估计角度与金标准之间的差异,使用了来自Qualysis光学动作捕捉系统(Qualisys AB, Göteborg,瑞典)和Delsys惯性测量系统(Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA)的数据。本研究共招募受试者24例(女性6例,男性18例,年龄:22.6±2.6岁;高度:172.6±10.3 cm;重量:72.2±16.02 kg)。他们都在一个30厘米高的平台上完成双腿着地任务,距离他们身体高度的一半,同时在胸骨、L5、双侧大腿、小腿和脚上佩戴8个IMU传感器。除了在8个位置安装IMU传感器外,受试者在上半身和下半身佩戴了反光标记,用于3D运动捕捉数据分析。采用多尺度庞卡罗图和循环量化分析进行主观视觉评价。非线性分析方法是有前途的实际应用,特别是使用循环量化分析和多尺度庞卡罗图更容易解释。在多尺度庞卡罗分析的情况下,发现IMU的估计角度与金标准在置信椭圆参数方面存在差异。此外,这些方法的量化参数适合与其他评估方法在时域、频域和时频域进行集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Nonlinear Analysis Methods for Visual Evaluation and Graphical Representation of Bilateral Jump Landing Tasks
Nonlinear analysis methods enable the evaluation of signal chaos parameters such as variability, persistence, and complexity. In order to assess the differences between individual bilateral jump landing tasks and between IMU estimated angle and the gold standard, data obtained from Qualysis optical Mocap (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden) and Delsys inertial measurement systems (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) were used. 24 subjects were recruited in this study (6 females and 18 males, age: 22.6 ± 2.6 years old; height: 172.6 ± 10.3 cm; weight: 72.2 ± 16.02 kg). All of them perform double-leg landing tasks from a 30 cm height platform and a distance of half of their body height while wearing 8 IMU sensors on the sternum, L5, bilateral thigh, shank, and foot. In addition to IMU sensors on 8 locations, the subject wore retroreflective markers on the upper and lower parts for 3D motion capture data analysis. Multiscale Poincaré plots and recurrent quantification analysis were employed for subjective visual evaluation. Nonlinear analysis methods are promising practical applications, particularly with the use of recurrent quantification analysis and multiscale Poincaré plots for easier interpretation. In the case of multiscale Poincaré analysis, a difference between the estimated angle from the IMU and the gold standard in terms of confidence ellipse parameters was found. Additionally, the quantification parameters of these methods are suitable for integration with other evaluation methods in the time domain, frequency domain, and time-frequency domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信