单孔子宫肌瘤切除术:机器人与腹腔镜

Jong-wook Seo, I. Lee, Hye soo Yoon, Kyung Lim Lee, J. Chung
{"title":"单孔子宫肌瘤切除术:机器人与腹腔镜","authors":"Jong-wook Seo, I. Lee, Hye soo Yoon, Kyung Lim Lee, J. Chung","doi":"10.36637/grs.2021.00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) and laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy (LSSM).Methods: From January 2017 to December 2019, electronic medical records of the consecutively held 17 RSSM and 20 LSSM were reviewed. Parameters including patient’s characteristics, the total operation time, size and number of myomas taken out, operative findings, intra and postoperative complications were compared.Results: Patients who undertook RSSM were younger (27.0±7.1 vs. 32.9±7.9) and only one out of 17 (2.9%) had previous pregnancy compared to 10 out of 20 in LSSM (50.0%). Complex cases with tumors of larger size and accompanied adhesion were done using RSSM. The median operative time was longer in the RSSM (176.1±59.0 vs. 77.5±47.1). All cases were successfully performed via a single port. No cases of postoperative complication including wound dehiscence or intestinal obstruction occurred in either group.Conclusion: Perioperative outcomes of myomectomy undertaken by robotic single-site surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery were comparable, though myomectomy for the larger myoma were performed with robotic single-site surgery. The role of robotic single-site myomectomy on fertility needs further investigation.","PeriodicalId":240488,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Robotic Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-port myomectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic\",\"authors\":\"Jong-wook Seo, I. Lee, Hye soo Yoon, Kyung Lim Lee, J. Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.36637/grs.2021.00066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) and laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy (LSSM).Methods: From January 2017 to December 2019, electronic medical records of the consecutively held 17 RSSM and 20 LSSM were reviewed. Parameters including patient’s characteristics, the total operation time, size and number of myomas taken out, operative findings, intra and postoperative complications were compared.Results: Patients who undertook RSSM were younger (27.0±7.1 vs. 32.9±7.9) and only one out of 17 (2.9%) had previous pregnancy compared to 10 out of 20 in LSSM (50.0%). Complex cases with tumors of larger size and accompanied adhesion were done using RSSM. The median operative time was longer in the RSSM (176.1±59.0 vs. 77.5±47.1). All cases were successfully performed via a single port. No cases of postoperative complication including wound dehiscence or intestinal obstruction occurred in either group.Conclusion: Perioperative outcomes of myomectomy undertaken by robotic single-site surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery were comparable, though myomectomy for the larger myoma were performed with robotic single-site surgery. The role of robotic single-site myomectomy on fertility needs further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36637/grs.2021.00066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36637/grs.2021.00066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较机器人单点子宫肌瘤切除术(RSSM)与腹腔镜单点子宫肌瘤切除术(LSSM)的围手术期疗效。方法:对2017年1月至2019年12月连续持有的17例RSSM和20例LSSM的电子病历进行回顾性分析。比较患者特征、手术总时间、切除肌瘤大小及数目、手术表现、术中及术后并发症等参数。结果:接受RSSM的患者更年轻(27.0±7.1比32.9±7.9),17人中只有1人(2.9%)有过妊娠史,而LSSM中20人中有10人(50.0%)有过妊娠史。肿瘤体积较大并伴有粘连的复杂病例采用RSSM。RSSM组的中位手术时间更长(176.1±59.0比77.5±47.1)。所有病例均通过单个端口成功完成。两组均未发生伤口裂开、肠梗阻等术后并发症。结论:机器人单点手术和腹腔镜单点手术的围手术期效果相当,但较大的肌瘤的子宫肌瘤切除术采用机器人单点手术。机器人单点子宫肌瘤切除术对生育能力的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-port myomectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic
Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) and laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy (LSSM).Methods: From January 2017 to December 2019, electronic medical records of the consecutively held 17 RSSM and 20 LSSM were reviewed. Parameters including patient’s characteristics, the total operation time, size and number of myomas taken out, operative findings, intra and postoperative complications were compared.Results: Patients who undertook RSSM were younger (27.0±7.1 vs. 32.9±7.9) and only one out of 17 (2.9%) had previous pregnancy compared to 10 out of 20 in LSSM (50.0%). Complex cases with tumors of larger size and accompanied adhesion were done using RSSM. The median operative time was longer in the RSSM (176.1±59.0 vs. 77.5±47.1). All cases were successfully performed via a single port. No cases of postoperative complication including wound dehiscence or intestinal obstruction occurred in either group.Conclusion: Perioperative outcomes of myomectomy undertaken by robotic single-site surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery were comparable, though myomectomy for the larger myoma were performed with robotic single-site surgery. The role of robotic single-site myomectomy on fertility needs further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信