基于监督学习方法的比特币反洗钱比较分析

Ismail Alarab, S. Prakoonwit, Mohamed Ikbal Nacer
{"title":"基于监督学习方法的比特币反洗钱比较分析","authors":"Ismail Alarab, S. Prakoonwit, Mohamed Ikbal Nacer","doi":"10.1145/3409073.3409078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advance of Bitcoin technology, money laundering has been incentivised as a den of Bitcoin blockchain, in which the user's identity is hidden behind a pseudonym known as address. Although this trait permits concealing in the plain sight, the public ledger of Bitcoin blockchain provides more power for investigators and allows collective intelligence for anti-money laundering and forensic analysis. This fascinating paradox arises in the strength of Bitcoin technology. Machine learning techniques have attained promising results in forensic analysis, in order to spot suspicious behaviour in Bitcoin blockchain. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of classical supervised learning methods using a recently published data set derived from Bitcoin blockchain, to predict licit and illicit transactions in the network. Besides, an ensemble learning method is utilised using a combination of the given supervised learning models, which outperforms the given classical methods. This experiment is performed using a newly published data set derived from Bitcoin blockchain. Our main contribution points out that using ensemble learning approach outperforms the performance of the classical learning models used in the original paper, using Elliptic data set, a time series of Bitcoin transaction graph with node transactions and directed payments flow edges. Using the same data set, we show that we are able to predict licit/illicit transactions with an accuracy of 98.13% and F1 score equals to 83.36% using the proposed method. We discuss the variety of supervised learning methods, and their capabilities of assisting forensic analysis, and propose future work directions.","PeriodicalId":229746,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis Using Supervised Learning Methods for Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin\",\"authors\":\"Ismail Alarab, S. Prakoonwit, Mohamed Ikbal Nacer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3409073.3409078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advance of Bitcoin technology, money laundering has been incentivised as a den of Bitcoin blockchain, in which the user's identity is hidden behind a pseudonym known as address. Although this trait permits concealing in the plain sight, the public ledger of Bitcoin blockchain provides more power for investigators and allows collective intelligence for anti-money laundering and forensic analysis. This fascinating paradox arises in the strength of Bitcoin technology. Machine learning techniques have attained promising results in forensic analysis, in order to spot suspicious behaviour in Bitcoin blockchain. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of classical supervised learning methods using a recently published data set derived from Bitcoin blockchain, to predict licit and illicit transactions in the network. Besides, an ensemble learning method is utilised using a combination of the given supervised learning models, which outperforms the given classical methods. This experiment is performed using a newly published data set derived from Bitcoin blockchain. Our main contribution points out that using ensemble learning approach outperforms the performance of the classical learning models used in the original paper, using Elliptic data set, a time series of Bitcoin transaction graph with node transactions and directed payments flow edges. Using the same data set, we show that we are able to predict licit/illicit transactions with an accuracy of 98.13% and F1 score equals to 83.36% using the proposed method. We discuss the variety of supervised learning methods, and their capabilities of assisting forensic analysis, and propose future work directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409073.3409078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409073.3409078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

随着比特币技术的进步,洗钱被激励为比特币区块链的巢穴,在比特币区块链中,用户的身份隐藏在一个名为地址的假名后面。虽然这种特性允许隐藏在显而易见的地方,但比特币区块链的公共分类账为调查人员提供了更多的权力,并允许集体智慧进行反洗钱和法医分析。这个引人入胜的悖论出现在比特币技术的力量中。为了发现比特币区块链中的可疑行为,机器学习技术在法医分析方面取得了可喜的成果。本文使用最近发布的来自比特币区块链的数据集,对经典监督学习方法的性能进行了比较分析,以预测网络中的合法和非法交易。此外,结合给定的监督学习模型,采用集成学习方法,优于给定的经典方法。本实验使用来自比特币区块链的新发布数据集进行。我们的主要贡献指出,使用集成学习方法优于原始论文中使用的经典学习模型的性能,该模型使用椭圆数据集,一个具有节点交易和定向支付流边的比特币交易图时间序列。使用相同的数据集,我们表明我们能够使用所提出的方法预测合法/非法交易,准确率为98.13%,F1分数等于83.36%。我们讨论了各种监督学习方法及其辅助法医分析的能力,并提出了未来的工作方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis Using Supervised Learning Methods for Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin
With the advance of Bitcoin technology, money laundering has been incentivised as a den of Bitcoin blockchain, in which the user's identity is hidden behind a pseudonym known as address. Although this trait permits concealing in the plain sight, the public ledger of Bitcoin blockchain provides more power for investigators and allows collective intelligence for anti-money laundering and forensic analysis. This fascinating paradox arises in the strength of Bitcoin technology. Machine learning techniques have attained promising results in forensic analysis, in order to spot suspicious behaviour in Bitcoin blockchain. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of classical supervised learning methods using a recently published data set derived from Bitcoin blockchain, to predict licit and illicit transactions in the network. Besides, an ensemble learning method is utilised using a combination of the given supervised learning models, which outperforms the given classical methods. This experiment is performed using a newly published data set derived from Bitcoin blockchain. Our main contribution points out that using ensemble learning approach outperforms the performance of the classical learning models used in the original paper, using Elliptic data set, a time series of Bitcoin transaction graph with node transactions and directed payments flow edges. Using the same data set, we show that we are able to predict licit/illicit transactions with an accuracy of 98.13% and F1 score equals to 83.36% using the proposed method. We discuss the variety of supervised learning methods, and their capabilities of assisting forensic analysis, and propose future work directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信