狡猾的病人、福利女王和美国种族的重复

K. Bridges
{"title":"狡猾的病人、福利女王和美国种族的重复","authors":"K. Bridges","doi":"10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520268944.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. IntroductionThis paper is a product of eighteen months of anthropological fieldwork undertaken in the obstetrics clinic of Alpha Hospital - a large, public hospital in Manhattan. After finally receiving authorization to begin my fieldwork from all relevant Institutional Review Boards (\"IRB\"), well over a year after I began the approval process, I was eager to begin observation of the Alpha Hospital obstetrics clinic. Dr. Christina Smith - the Director of the Ambulatory Care Building that housed the obstetrics clinic, my initial contact with the hospital, the person who had been named as principal investigator of my study in the NYU IRB documents, and my direct supervisor in the hospital - suggested that I introduce my research and myself to the clinic staff at the clinic's monthly interdisciplinary meeting. Accordingly, my fieldwork began with me describing my project (within the five minutes allotted to me) to a motley assemblage of nurses, medical doctors,1 midwives, and administrative assistants that drifted in and out of the classroom over the course of the meeting.Subsequent to my brief talk, the executive director of Alpha Hospital gave a presentation, entitled \"The Alpha Hospital Mission and Vision.\" In it, she described \"the unanimous sentiment\" felt by Alpha employees that working at Alpha was a challenging endeavor. The presentation continued with a relatively grim portrait of the hospital. She depicted a hostile state of affairs in which the categories of the players in the clinic were positioned in oppositional relationships to one another: hospital and clinic administrators against providers,2 providers against ancillary staff,3 and ancillary staff against patients. After the director concluded, Dr. Smith commented that, with regard to the acrimonious relationship between ancillary staff and patients, her personal observations supported those of the director. She offered that she received a consequential number of complaints from patients who were dissatisfied with and angered by the way that they were treated by staff persons. Indeed, over the course of the eighteen months during which I observed and worked in the Alpha obstetrics clinic, my field notes became filled with descriptions of outrageously hostile interactions between the frontline staff and patients. These displays of antagonism became a banality - an eventuality that I could observe on any given day that I was in the clinic. It was the ordinariness of these contentious interactions that compelled me to inquire into their significance, their causes, and their effects.Belligerent confrontations between staff and patients, I believe, are the consequence of a phenomenon whereby patients are largely viewed by Alpha Hospital ancillary staff as uneducated and unintelligent, yet somehow incredibly shrewd manipulators of the Alpha \"system.\" The intersection of these contradictions in the fantasy of the patient seeking healthcare from Alpha produces a figure that I call the \"wily patient.\" The wily patient, although obtuse, backwards, and altogether unintelligent, nevertheless possesses the ability to craftily and astutely exploit the hospital for the purpose of attaining access to undeserved appointments, ultrasounds, and other gratuitous healthcare.I explore this figure of the wily patient in Part II. The first section of this Part discusses demonstrations of that which is perceived by ancillary staff as patient stupidity, while the second section discusses demonstrations of that which is perceived as patient duplicity - the other term in the \"wily patient\" equation. The simultaneity of the contradictions present in the wily patient is not unlike that found in the fantasy of the \"welfare queen\" - that is, the obtuse, backwards, and unintelligent woman who nevertheless possesses the ability to craftily and astutely exploit the federal and state governments for the purpose of attaining access to undeserved cash assistance. Part III compares the figures of the wily patient and the welfare queen and notes a divergence between the two: while the welfare queen is implicitly Black, the wily patient appears to be of any race. …","PeriodicalId":344781,"journal":{"name":"Texas Journal of Women, Gender, and the Law","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wily Patients, Welfare Queens, and the Reiteration of Race in the U.S\",\"authors\":\"K. Bridges\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520268944.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I. IntroductionThis paper is a product of eighteen months of anthropological fieldwork undertaken in the obstetrics clinic of Alpha Hospital - a large, public hospital in Manhattan. After finally receiving authorization to begin my fieldwork from all relevant Institutional Review Boards (\\\"IRB\\\"), well over a year after I began the approval process, I was eager to begin observation of the Alpha Hospital obstetrics clinic. Dr. Christina Smith - the Director of the Ambulatory Care Building that housed the obstetrics clinic, my initial contact with the hospital, the person who had been named as principal investigator of my study in the NYU IRB documents, and my direct supervisor in the hospital - suggested that I introduce my research and myself to the clinic staff at the clinic's monthly interdisciplinary meeting. Accordingly, my fieldwork began with me describing my project (within the five minutes allotted to me) to a motley assemblage of nurses, medical doctors,1 midwives, and administrative assistants that drifted in and out of the classroom over the course of the meeting.Subsequent to my brief talk, the executive director of Alpha Hospital gave a presentation, entitled \\\"The Alpha Hospital Mission and Vision.\\\" In it, she described \\\"the unanimous sentiment\\\" felt by Alpha employees that working at Alpha was a challenging endeavor. The presentation continued with a relatively grim portrait of the hospital. She depicted a hostile state of affairs in which the categories of the players in the clinic were positioned in oppositional relationships to one another: hospital and clinic administrators against providers,2 providers against ancillary staff,3 and ancillary staff against patients. After the director concluded, Dr. Smith commented that, with regard to the acrimonious relationship between ancillary staff and patients, her personal observations supported those of the director. She offered that she received a consequential number of complaints from patients who were dissatisfied with and angered by the way that they were treated by staff persons. Indeed, over the course of the eighteen months during which I observed and worked in the Alpha obstetrics clinic, my field notes became filled with descriptions of outrageously hostile interactions between the frontline staff and patients. These displays of antagonism became a banality - an eventuality that I could observe on any given day that I was in the clinic. It was the ordinariness of these contentious interactions that compelled me to inquire into their significance, their causes, and their effects.Belligerent confrontations between staff and patients, I believe, are the consequence of a phenomenon whereby patients are largely viewed by Alpha Hospital ancillary staff as uneducated and unintelligent, yet somehow incredibly shrewd manipulators of the Alpha \\\"system.\\\" The intersection of these contradictions in the fantasy of the patient seeking healthcare from Alpha produces a figure that I call the \\\"wily patient.\\\" The wily patient, although obtuse, backwards, and altogether unintelligent, nevertheless possesses the ability to craftily and astutely exploit the hospital for the purpose of attaining access to undeserved appointments, ultrasounds, and other gratuitous healthcare.I explore this figure of the wily patient in Part II. The first section of this Part discusses demonstrations of that which is perceived by ancillary staff as patient stupidity, while the second section discusses demonstrations of that which is perceived as patient duplicity - the other term in the \\\"wily patient\\\" equation. The simultaneity of the contradictions present in the wily patient is not unlike that found in the fantasy of the \\\"welfare queen\\\" - that is, the obtuse, backwards, and unintelligent woman who nevertheless possesses the ability to craftily and astutely exploit the federal and state governments for the purpose of attaining access to undeserved cash assistance. Part III compares the figures of the wily patient and the welfare queen and notes a divergence between the two: while the welfare queen is implicitly Black, the wily patient appears to be of any race. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":344781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Journal of Women, Gender, and the Law\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Journal of Women, Gender, and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520268944.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Journal of Women, Gender, and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520268944.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

这篇论文是在曼哈顿的一家大型公立医院Alpha医院的产科诊所进行了18个月的人类学田野调查的结果。在我开始审批程序一年多之后,终于收到了所有相关机构审查委员会(IRB)的授权,开始了我的实地考察,我渴望开始观察阿尔法医院产科诊所。克里斯蒂娜·史密斯(Christina Smith)医生——产科诊所所在的门诊护理大楼的主任,我与医院的最初联系人,在纽约大学伦理委员会文件中被任命为我研究的首席研究员的人,以及我在医院的直接主管——建议我在诊所每月的跨学科会议上向诊所的工作人员介绍我的研究和我自己。因此,我的实地工作开始于我向一群护士、医生、助产士和行政助理描述我的项目(在分配给我的五分钟内),他们在会议过程中进进出出,五花八门。在我简短的谈话之后,阿尔法医院的执行主任做了一个题为“阿尔法医院的使命和愿景”的演讲。在信中,她描述了Alpha员工的“一致看法”,即在Alpha工作是一项具有挑战性的努力。报告继续介绍了这家医院相对严峻的情况。她描述了一种敌对的状态在这种状态下,诊所中的参与者类别被置于彼此对立的关系中:医院和诊所管理者反对提供者,提供者反对辅助人员,辅助人员反对病人。在主任总结后,史密斯医生评论说,关于辅助人员和病人之间的激烈关系,她的个人观察支持主任的意见。她说,她收到了相应数量的病人投诉,他们对工作人员对待他们的方式感到不满和愤怒。事实上,在我在阿尔法产科诊所观察和工作的18个月里,我的现场记录中充满了对一线工作人员和病人之间令人发指的敌对互动的描述。这些对抗的表现变成了一种常态——我在诊所里的任何一天都能观察到这种情况。正是这些有争议的相互作用的寻常性,迫使我去探究它们的意义、原因和结果。我认为,员工和患者之间的激烈对抗是一种现象的结果,即患者在阿尔法医院的辅助员工看来,大多是没有受过教育和不聪明的人,但不知何故,他们是阿尔法“系统”令人难以置信的精明操纵者。在病人向Alpha寻求医疗保健的幻想中,这些矛盾的交集产生了一个我称之为“狡猾的病人”的人物。老谋深算的病人,虽然迟钝、落后,而且完全不聪明,但却有能力狡猾而精明地利用医院,以获得不应有的预约、超声波检查和其他免费保健服务。我在第二部分探讨了这个老谋深算的病人。本部分的第一部分讨论了被辅助人员认为是病人愚蠢的证明,而第二部分讨论了被认为是病人表里不一的证明——这是“狡猾的病人”等式中的另一个术语。狡猾的病人身上出现的矛盾的同时性,与“福利女王”的幻想没有什么不同。“福利女王”是一个迟钝、落后、不聪明的女人,但她却有能力狡猾而精明地利用联邦和州政府,以获得不应得的现金援助。第三部分比较了狡猾的病人和福利女王的形象,并注意到两者之间的分歧:虽然福利女王含蓄地是黑人,但狡猾的病人似乎是任何种族。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wily Patients, Welfare Queens, and the Reiteration of Race in the U.S
I. IntroductionThis paper is a product of eighteen months of anthropological fieldwork undertaken in the obstetrics clinic of Alpha Hospital - a large, public hospital in Manhattan. After finally receiving authorization to begin my fieldwork from all relevant Institutional Review Boards ("IRB"), well over a year after I began the approval process, I was eager to begin observation of the Alpha Hospital obstetrics clinic. Dr. Christina Smith - the Director of the Ambulatory Care Building that housed the obstetrics clinic, my initial contact with the hospital, the person who had been named as principal investigator of my study in the NYU IRB documents, and my direct supervisor in the hospital - suggested that I introduce my research and myself to the clinic staff at the clinic's monthly interdisciplinary meeting. Accordingly, my fieldwork began with me describing my project (within the five minutes allotted to me) to a motley assemblage of nurses, medical doctors,1 midwives, and administrative assistants that drifted in and out of the classroom over the course of the meeting.Subsequent to my brief talk, the executive director of Alpha Hospital gave a presentation, entitled "The Alpha Hospital Mission and Vision." In it, she described "the unanimous sentiment" felt by Alpha employees that working at Alpha was a challenging endeavor. The presentation continued with a relatively grim portrait of the hospital. She depicted a hostile state of affairs in which the categories of the players in the clinic were positioned in oppositional relationships to one another: hospital and clinic administrators against providers,2 providers against ancillary staff,3 and ancillary staff against patients. After the director concluded, Dr. Smith commented that, with regard to the acrimonious relationship between ancillary staff and patients, her personal observations supported those of the director. She offered that she received a consequential number of complaints from patients who were dissatisfied with and angered by the way that they were treated by staff persons. Indeed, over the course of the eighteen months during which I observed and worked in the Alpha obstetrics clinic, my field notes became filled with descriptions of outrageously hostile interactions between the frontline staff and patients. These displays of antagonism became a banality - an eventuality that I could observe on any given day that I was in the clinic. It was the ordinariness of these contentious interactions that compelled me to inquire into their significance, their causes, and their effects.Belligerent confrontations between staff and patients, I believe, are the consequence of a phenomenon whereby patients are largely viewed by Alpha Hospital ancillary staff as uneducated and unintelligent, yet somehow incredibly shrewd manipulators of the Alpha "system." The intersection of these contradictions in the fantasy of the patient seeking healthcare from Alpha produces a figure that I call the "wily patient." The wily patient, although obtuse, backwards, and altogether unintelligent, nevertheless possesses the ability to craftily and astutely exploit the hospital for the purpose of attaining access to undeserved appointments, ultrasounds, and other gratuitous healthcare.I explore this figure of the wily patient in Part II. The first section of this Part discusses demonstrations of that which is perceived by ancillary staff as patient stupidity, while the second section discusses demonstrations of that which is perceived as patient duplicity - the other term in the "wily patient" equation. The simultaneity of the contradictions present in the wily patient is not unlike that found in the fantasy of the "welfare queen" - that is, the obtuse, backwards, and unintelligent woman who nevertheless possesses the ability to craftily and astutely exploit the federal and state governments for the purpose of attaining access to undeserved cash assistance. Part III compares the figures of the wily patient and the welfare queen and notes a divergence between the two: while the welfare queen is implicitly Black, the wily patient appears to be of any race. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信