具有两个并联中继的无线网络中的路由和频谱效率

Shashank V. Maiya, T. Fuja
{"title":"具有两个并联中继的无线网络中的路由和频谱效率","authors":"Shashank V. Maiya, T. Fuja","doi":"10.1109/ISIT.2008.4595201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares routing strategies in a simple four node network consisting of a source, a destination, and two parallel relays. Relay-to-relay communication is not considered, so there are three possible routing strategies: (1.) direct (source-to-destination) transmission; (2.) two-hop transmission that makes use of exactly one relay (i.e., the better-placed relay); and (3.) two-hop transmission wherein both relays are used during the second hop. The channel model assumes additive white Gaussian noise and attenuation due to path loss; for two-hop routing, time division multiple access is assumed for interference mitigation. Using simple capacity arguments, the paper first compares two-hop routing through one relay and two-hop routing through two relays and characterizes the relay placements for which one mode is preferable to the other. Then, two-hop transmission exploiting both relays is compared with direct transmission. It is shown that if the desired end-to-end rate is above a critical spectral efficiency, it is always preferable to transmit the signal directly no matter where the two relays are located.","PeriodicalId":194674,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routing and spectral efficiency in a wireless network with two parallel relays\",\"authors\":\"Shashank V. Maiya, T. Fuja\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISIT.2008.4595201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares routing strategies in a simple four node network consisting of a source, a destination, and two parallel relays. Relay-to-relay communication is not considered, so there are three possible routing strategies: (1.) direct (source-to-destination) transmission; (2.) two-hop transmission that makes use of exactly one relay (i.e., the better-placed relay); and (3.) two-hop transmission wherein both relays are used during the second hop. The channel model assumes additive white Gaussian noise and attenuation due to path loss; for two-hop routing, time division multiple access is assumed for interference mitigation. Using simple capacity arguments, the paper first compares two-hop routing through one relay and two-hop routing through two relays and characterizes the relay placements for which one mode is preferable to the other. Then, two-hop transmission exploiting both relays is compared with direct transmission. It is shown that if the desired end-to-end rate is above a critical spectral efficiency, it is always preferable to transmit the signal directly no matter where the two relays are located.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2008.4595201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2008.4595201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了由一个源、一个目的和两个并行中继组成的简单四节点网络中的路由策略。不考虑中继到中继的通信,因此有三种可能的路由策略:(1)直接(源到目的)传输;(2)仅使用一个中继(即位置较好的中继)的两跳传输;以及(3)在第二跳期间使用两个中继的两跳传输。信道模型假定加性高斯白噪声和路径损耗衰减;对于两跳路由,假设时分多址以减少干扰。利用简单的容量参数,本文首先比较了通过一个中继的两跳路由和通过两个中继的两跳路由,并描述了一种模式优于另一种模式的中继位置。然后,将利用两个中继的两跳传输与直接传输进行了比较。结果表明,如果期望的端到端速率高于临界频谱效率,则无论两个中继位于何处,直接传输信号总是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routing and spectral efficiency in a wireless network with two parallel relays
This paper compares routing strategies in a simple four node network consisting of a source, a destination, and two parallel relays. Relay-to-relay communication is not considered, so there are three possible routing strategies: (1.) direct (source-to-destination) transmission; (2.) two-hop transmission that makes use of exactly one relay (i.e., the better-placed relay); and (3.) two-hop transmission wherein both relays are used during the second hop. The channel model assumes additive white Gaussian noise and attenuation due to path loss; for two-hop routing, time division multiple access is assumed for interference mitigation. Using simple capacity arguments, the paper first compares two-hop routing through one relay and two-hop routing through two relays and characterizes the relay placements for which one mode is preferable to the other. Then, two-hop transmission exploiting both relays is compared with direct transmission. It is shown that if the desired end-to-end rate is above a critical spectral efficiency, it is always preferable to transmit the signal directly no matter where the two relays are located.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信